Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Disappointed Webb 'unaware Toulon move would mean Wales exile'

Wales and Ospreys’ Rhys Webb

Rhys Webb says he was unaware he was jeopardising his Wales career when he agreed to sign for Top 14 side Toulon.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Ospreys scrum-half will make himself ineligible for selection when he heads to the south of France at the end of the season, after the WRU brought in a new 60-cap cut-off point to replace the convoluted Senior Players Selection Policy – also known as Gatland’s Law

From next season, Welsh players plying their trade outside the Principality will only be able to represent Wales if they have won 60 or more caps.

Read more: Shock as Wales scrap ‘Gatland’s Law’

It means Webb, who has 28 Welsh caps, will be forced into international exile for the length of his three-year contract in the south of France. He would only be considered for the national team if he moves back to one of Wales’s four regional sides.

Webb told Wales Online: “I am very disappointed at the news because I love playing for Wales. It means a huge amount to me.”

And he insisted he had no idea of the impending changes: “I didn’t know the full implications when I agreed to join Toulon because the change in the selection policy came out after I signed.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Wales coach Warren Gatland, however, claims that both player and agent entered the Toulon negotiations with their eyes wide open. “They were aware this policy may be introduced,” he said.

He added that that he believes Webb could still walk away from the French deal.

Toulon have lost scrum-halves to changes of mind before. Like Webb, France’s South African-born international Rory Kockott had signed a letter of agreement to join the club from the 2014/15 season before changing his mind and opting to stay at Castres Olympique. It was a decision that would cost his employers €400,000.

Notable Wales names Taulupe Faletau, George North and Jamie Roberts will be unaffected by the shift in selection policy, despite playing in England, as they all have more than 60 caps.

Injuries permitting, Dan Biggar should cross the 60-cap mark before he moves to Northampton next summer, while Saracens’ Liam Williams will also remain available for selection, despite only having 43 caps, as he joined the English club on a three-year deal before the announcement was made. He has time to pass the 60-cap threshold before his current deal runs out.

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Singapore SVNS Day 1 - Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 12 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

28 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed
Search