Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Blues suffer injury blow before season opener

The Blues. Photo by Mark Tantrum/Getty Images

The Blues will be without a key man when they open their 2019 campaign against the defending champion Crusaders at Eden Park next weekend.

First-five eighth Stephen Perofeta, who started the side’s last preseason match against the Hurricanes, is unlikely to be available due to a chest/shoulder injury. According to the New Zealand Herald the injury will keep Perofeta sidelined for several weeks.

Fortunately, five eighth Otere Black has shone after a long layoff following a serious knee injury and shapes as the man to likely fill the no 10 shirt against the Crusaders next weekend.

Who will play outside Black remains a mystery. 36-year-old Ma’a Nonu looks a shoo-in after an impressive 60 minute shift at centre against the Hurricanes.

“He scored a really good try, carried hard and was aggressive in defence,” head coach Leon MacDonald said of Nonu. “He was really good actually. It was his first game in a while and he said the pace of the game was a bit different to what he had been experiencing in France, but he loved it.

“He’s a popular member of the team. At 14-0 down, he was probably the calm voice which helped keep the composure in the group; he helped us keep our focus.

Whether Nonu is flanked by TJ Faiane or Sonny Bill Williams remains to be seen, with MacDonald not giving much away.

“Sonny is a quality player and has trained really well and is available for selection,” MacDonald told The New Zealand Herald. “Ma’a’s performance – we haven’t seen him play yet and he played really well. One of the most consistent players in our whole pre-season campaign has been TJ Faiane who is carrying on his good Mitre 10 Cup form. It’s going to be a hot topic, that selection in the midfield.”

“There are some good players who have played good rugby over the last couple of weeks who are going to miss out. That’s always a tough conversation to have but it’s what we want [selection pressure].

“The midfield is obviously a key area. The front row was performed really well in the absence of [All Blacks] Karl [Tu’inukuafe] and Ofa [Tuungafasi] so there are plenty of selection headaches.”

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 7 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

21 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search