Northern | US

'100% legal': The All Blacks tactic that surprised Rassie Erasmus

New Zealand's centre Jordie Barrett takcles South Africa's centre Andre Esterhuizen during the Rugby's Greatest Rivalry international rugby union match between South Africa and New Zealand at Ellis Park Stadium in Johannesburg, on August 22, 2026. (Photo by PHILL MAGAKOE / AFP via Getty Images)
Comments
20 Comments

Springboks head coach Rassie Erasmus was left surprised by the unexpected defensive tactic by the All Blacks in the 33-16 loss in the first Test at Ellis Park in Johannesburg.

ADVERTISEMENT

The All Blacks stripped a lot of ball away from South Africa’s ball carriers, something that Erasmus said he hadn’t seen on the tape when it came to the All Blacks tackling techniques.

Despite winning the penalty count 14-10, a total of 23 turnovers lost for the Springboks proved to be insurmountable.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“They had a very clever tactic, again, 100% legal, they were stripping in the tackle,” Erasmus said post-match.

“They didn’t tackle like we practiced, that we thought they would. They were normally either pushing down or chop tackles, and in this game, they had a lot of strips.

“Even the try or the non-try, which we didn’t maul, the ball was stripped right over the touch line.

“The one where Jasper got pushed into Grant [Williams] when the ball got blocked down there.

“So a lot of them [turnovers] is because of the good work of New Zealand. That the ball wasn’t slippery. We can’t use that as an excuse. We’re not an inexperienced team that played.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It’s probably the pressure that they put on us, at that different loose play, breakouts, and so on. We didn’t do well there, and they did great.”

Erasmus credited the way that the All Blacks put South Africa off their game by ‘harassing’ halfback Grant Williams, who was under pressure frequently.

“That’s probably the thing which New Zealand are great at,” he said, “is that they really know how to stop you inside the 22 in different ways, being stripping the ball, being it contesting for the ball on the ground, being it harrassing the nine within the laws.

“I’m not saying they’re doing it outside the laws, and and we couldn’t handle that.

“I don’t want it quoted the wrong way, but I thought up until minutes 50, we were really dominating territory, possession, and we felt that we were really in the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“But a class team like New Zealand, if you don’t convert, they give you proper hiding.”

Register your interest to receive priority updates on RWC27 ticket releases. Don't miss out, stay in the loop!


ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

20 Comments
d
d 45 days ago

We can win matches with something less than parity in the scrums and mauls, but why did Roigard persist with stupid box kicks that were never contested and therefore just handed over the ball? The Boks were way better at that.


Also in the NC matches we were beating the rush defence by skip passing and passing deeper, but in this match we resorted to the old predictable shuffle the ball from hand to hand; why? Where is the innovation from set piece?


But as long as Rennie’s team keep coming up with the right recipe for each match, it’s hard to complain too loudly.

T
Tk 45 days ago

The Boks weren't just in the game for 50 minutes, they were pretty much physically dominating the ABs. Jason Ryan has a lot of work to do this week!

T
Tim 45 days ago

Its all part of the master plan from Rennie and Co. Sucker punch.

B
B 45 days ago

The AB's aren't the only team who try to strip the ball in a tackle, SA do it too but today the AB's were better at it and Jordies strip stopped Marx from scoring a game changer…He was completely focused on the ball not the man…

L
LW 44 days ago

Jordie himself would say he was lucky, he was reaching down to hold his shoulder not to tap the ball. Very lucky

T
TOSP 45 days ago

I thought the strip on marx was more the knee of a ab player than jordie.

G
GL 45 days ago

All Rennie - very smart coach

J
JW 45 days ago

The strips are something we’ve been doing for a while now.

H
Hammer Head 45 days ago

Agreed. The coaching team at the ABs have surprised me, they played clever tactics and they have restored the ABs killer instincts.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

D
David Laurenson 32 minutes ago
Has the balance between attack and defence become too lopsided?

I and the many others could not disagree more. The score lines are reflective of mainly the ability of the more dominate team, on the day. Forward tries by crash n bash, The illegal mauls, where players are ahead of the ball carrier are an easy score. The one area where the offence team is king though is the Maul !The defensive capabilities to stop a maul are nil, it used to be that all players were not offside as long as they had contact with another player. This was mandatory whether or not you were at the sides or in fact anywhere in the meelay. Now you have to retreat on the refs call to the back, you can’t even tackle the ball carrier, as you then get penalized for collapsing the maul. ALL the advantage is with the offensive side, Mauls are a freeby ! The structure that favors forward participation is predicable and boring. Backs have had to become forwards ! Line speed has totally killed off, running play. To qualify the offside laws have not or seldom been altered since rugby went professional. No compensation has been made for these elite athletes of today, meaning LESS time and SPACE to find a gap. Our game is compressed. We see all games where the pass is made and the receiver getting cleaned out. What does this tell us ? As coaches you have designed a bar the door screen of players, we have pods of forwards, hitting up with intent yet hardly making the gain line, time and time again. with phase play in the thirties. Backs are now used as forwards to hit it up and hopefully retain possession from the tackled ball or ruck. If you diagnosed our game with mathematicians and engineers, they would come up with two causes. Either you have less players, or you enlarge the field of play. Of course this would not be entertained, so the obvious solution is to add a metre to all the current off side laws. WHY to give a little time and space for the offensive team to attack, that’s right the opposite to what we have just read, but for both sides this would allow some freedom for backs to be backs, less kicking, less forward interference, we may even get our game back as it would be more enjoyable to play, to follow, to ref, fans could actually view tactics in motion as against the current predictability. Compression is negative, a little separation freedom.

6 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close