Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Why 25-year-old Samu Kerevi will be considering leaving Australian rugby

By Josh Raisey
Samu Kerevi. (Photo by Chris Hyde/Getty Images)

While nothing has been confirmed yet, it is widely speculated that the Queensland Reds captain and talisman Samu Kerevi will be moving to Japan after the World Cup this year.

ADVERTISEMENT

The centre is expected to join Suntory Goliath, bringing an end to his Super Rugby and Wallabies career for however long he is there. This is a decision that has shocked Australian fans, particularly given where he is in his career currently, and they have started to speculate why a player would seek a move away.

The 25-year-old is in the form of his life at the moment, as he has probably been the Reds’ best player this season, and one of Super Rugby’s. His power and offloading game give the Queensland side a lot of momentum, as he will be able to with the Wallabies. He will certainly play a major part in Michael Cheika’s World Cup campaign, but he will be saying goodbye to his international career temporarily after that.

With only 23 Wallabies caps, Kerevi would be unable to represent his country if he is playing abroad due to the Giteau Law, which requires players to have over 60 caps. This is something that he would have weighed up should he decide to leave.

The primary reason why fans think Kerevi wants to leave is money. The Japanese league, or France’s Top 14, can offer significantly more money than Rugby Australia can. Ultimately, this is Kerevi’s job, and it has to be treated like that sometimes. Making a move at the beginning of a World Cup cycle is the best option financially and in rugby terms, as it may not hamper his selection come 2023.

With Rugby Australia potentially facing a costly court battle with Israel Folau, some are speculating that this may be a drain on their resources, forcing some of their star players to make a move.

However, one factor that is being mentioned is the standard of rugby in Super Rugby no longer being what it used to be. While the issue of money has always been in the spotlight in Super Rugby, the decline in quality has been a more pernicious topic.

ADVERTISEMENT

While Japan will not offer a better standard, there is an argument that Super Rugby is not worth remaining in any more. The Reds play in a virtually empty stadium every week, as crowds and spectators seem uninterested. Kerevi must have noticed that, and it could have influenced his decision.

This is what the fans have said:

This is the big problem that Australian rugby and South African rugby are facing at the moment, as there is a major exodus of talent to the northern hemisphere. While the Springboks have loosened their selection criteria, meaning overseas players can represent their country, the Wallabies have not been so lax, but it is still not stopping some of their biggest stars from leaving.

ADVERTISEMENT

If Kerevi is to leave Australian rugby, he will play his last Super Rugby game this weekend against the Brumbies in Canberra, having played his last home game against the Blues in an emotional win last weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 9 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

36 Go to comments
A
Adrian 11 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

36 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby? Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?
Search