Northern | US

Waratahs officially commit to Rugby Australia's alignment plan


Waratahs fans fly flags in Super Rugby Pacific. Photo by Mark Evans/Getty Images
Comments
1 Comment

Rugby Australia has taken its first major official step towards alignment in the Australian game, putting pen to paper with the New South Wales Waratahs as the club commits to a centralised future.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Waratahs as well as the New South Wales Rugby Union are both on board with the new strategic vision, allowing Rugby Australia to effectively take responsibility for the Tahs’ high-performance operations, assets, liabilities, and commercial arrangements.

Ownership of the community game around the state will remain with the NSWRU.

“We are taking this bold step because we strongly believe the federated model for professional Rugby in Australia is unsustainable and that meaningful reform is long overdue,” said NSW Rugby Union CEO Paul Doorn.

“We are committed to the removal of the inherent conflicts and self-interest that have constrained meaningful progress in the past, and we are committed to the alignment of the high-performance and commercial operations between our club and Rugby Australia.

“I appreciate questions will be asked about the level of trust and confidence in RA’s ability to fully realise the benefits of integration. These are important questions – however, our decision reflects a commitment to deal with any such concern ‘inside the tent’, playing an active role in the most collaborative way possible.

“We are not content to sit on the sidelines any longer on this much-needed reform, and I hope all Super Rugby clubs will follow our lead as we push forward on an aligned Australian Rugby ecosystem.”

The deal comes after the Wallabies’ worst-ever Rugby World Cup showing and an international season in which they won just two out of their nine games.

ADVERTISEMENT

Rugby Australia announced in August the plan for a “reset” of the game, set to come into effect from January 1 2024.

“We have a plan that we are working on to unite the game – it will take the whole game to rebuild a system that delivers success on and off the field,” RA CEO Phil Waugh said.

“We have agreement from the five Australian Super Rugby clubs that we need to be pursuing an aligned high-performance system and pathways.

“There may be different models across different clubs, however, the Waratahs have been very clear that they see great benefits in aligning their commercial operations with RA’s, as we look to achieve maximum commercial return and efficiency for the game.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I firmly believe that this strategic reset is in the best interests of the game – and crucially, it delivers even greater priority to strengthening the community game; ringfencing investment in the community game and allowing state unions to focus entirely on grassroots and participation without the distraction of professional Rugby.

“It will allow the game to develop fully aligned pathways and high-performance structures to deliver lasting success for Australian Super Rugby clubs and our national teams.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 4 hours ago
France has conquered and reconquered Europe. Can it reach its Mount Everest?

It’s mind boggling that the best are not playing the best in July! Though the commercial reality bites here. On the B/C/D I think the issue is one of communicating ideas. You point out that in reality the majority of the players were third or fourth choice or perhaps worse. And the way you explained it as someone who clearly knows the French comp that makes sense. So I accept that it was perhaps a third or fourth choice team overall. I should be clear though I think that the quality of the team exceeded the sum of its parts. And I think a D grade is way too low. Their performance was too good to get such a grade. And I think that reflects that they are very good players who had a good chance to build combinations. Would the first choice players have played better - very likely. But that does not diminish the performance of the boys that played.

Put another way, I understand that the French team that played the Boks had a good number of first choice players in stark contrast to the teams that played in NZ. But they did not perform like an “A” team - clearly they had only got together just before that game. They started well but the lack of match readiness showed in the second half. In contrast the Boks had both their first choice team that was a battle hardened unit - and they played their A game, as they did against the ABs first choice team in Wellington. In contrast the first choice ABs beat the then first choice Boks in Auckland - it was the best performance all year by the ABs - it was an A grade performance (the Bok dominance in the forwards notwithstanding).



...

613 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Copied to clipboard

Share Article close