Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Wallaby in the dock over Super Rugby tackle

By Ian Cameron
(Photo by Brett Hemmings/Getty Images)

Wallabies call-up Lachlan Swinton has been cited for alleged foul play during a Super Rugby Pacific match that took place over the weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Swinton was named alongside teammate Izaia Perese and Queensland back-rower Harry Wilson among seven replacements for Eddie Jones’ first Wallabies training camp after the initial squad selection suffered a raft of injuries.

The Waratahs forward is accused of violating Law 9.13, which states that a player must not tackle an opponent late or dangerously. The incident occurred during the match between the Waratahs and Western Force at Allianz Stadium in Sydney.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The Citing Commissioner reviewed the footage of the match and determined that the incident met the red card threshold for foul play. As a result, the case will be considered by the SANZAAR Foul Play Review Committee on Monday via video-conference.

It is standard protocol for all disciplinary matters to be referred to the Foul Play Review Committee in the first instance, which provides the option of expediting the judicial process. However, for the matter to be dispensed with at this hearing, the person appearing must plead guilty and accept the penalty offered by the Foul Play Review Committee.

The outcome of the hearing will be eagerly awaited by fans of both teams. If found guilty, Swinton will likely be sidelined for at least three games.

Thirty-three Wallabies players will assemble on the Gold Coast on Monday while another seven ruled out with injury or concussion plus overseas-based stars Rory Arnold, Tom Banks, Quade Cooper, Bernard Foley, Marika Koroibete, Samu Kerevi and Will Skelton will zoom in remotely for team meetings.

ADVERTISEMENT

additional reporting AAP

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

1 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Brumbies and Reds primed to fly Aussie flag furthest Brumbies and Reds primed to fly Aussie flag furthest
Search