Northern | US

Until the All Blacks are actually put under pressure, we've got no idea if they are any good


Caleb Clarke, Beauden Barrett and Sam Cane of the All Blacks celebrate with the Bledisloe Cup after winning the 2020 Tri-Nations and Bledisloe Cup match between the Australian Wallabies and the New Zealand All Blacks at ANZ Stadium on October 31, 2020 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

It’s not the All Blacks’ fault that South Africa are sitting out The Rugby Championship.

Nor are they to blame Argentina’s shambolic preparation or the ineptitude of Australia’s performance on Saturday night.

But those things do mean we have to reserve judgement on anything this New Zealand team does in 2020.

The Wallabies were pathetic, in losing 43-5 to the All Blacks at ANZ Stadium.

Comparisons have inevitably been drawn between this game and the 1996 clash between the two countries at Athletic Park, where New Zealand were 43-6 victors. The truth is those two matches bear little resemblance because of the sad decline in the standard of Australian rugby.

Maybe we were fools to ourselves after last month’s 16-16 draw at Sky Stadium. Maybe we wanted some competition so badly and wanted to believe in Dave Rennie and wanted Ian Foster to face a bit of scrutiny that we completely overplayed Australia’s performance..

Maybe it was just a rusty day out for the All Blacks. Maybe if Rieko Ioane put the ball down properly then they’d have kicked away and won by plenty. Maybe the Wallabies are only any good when expectations are at an all-time low.

Whatever the case, the task Rennie faces as Australia coach remains a massive one. The Wallabies lack smarts and skills and grunt and their depth borders on non-existent.

Will they be competitive occasionally? Sure. But they’re a long way off finding the consistency required to regularly excel at international level.

After Wellington, I wrote that they could. In hindsight, I’ll have to admit I was wrong.

None of which tells us much about the All Blacks.

We don’t really fo short-termism in New Zealand. We’re always thinking in Rugby World Cup cycles and always trying to determine a team’s place in history.

We’re looking for greatness and confirmation that a squad and a coaching group does or doesn’t have that in them. All Blacks teams aren’t judged week-to-week, but against how they compare with all those who’ve gone before them.

We haven’t a clue about this New Zealand side. And we won’t for a while yet, either.

Without any actual opposition to gauge these guys against, there’s nothing that can be said about this team or the quality of their coaches.

South Africa, England, France and Ireland are the benchmark sides and sadly none are on the itinerary right now.

You have to admire SA Rugby. There aren’t many governing bodies who wouldn’t put money ahead of player welfare or legacy.

A Springboks’ side could’ve been cobbled together and could’ve been dispatched to Australia but, in the circumstances, it wouldn’t have performed a lot better than the Wallabies have.

As for the All Blacks well, without wanting to labour the point too much, we’re still little the wiser.

I’m not convinced about their props, blindside flanker is up for grabs, captain Sam Cane remains susceptible to head knocks, Richie Mo’unga hasn’t established himself at 10, Jack Goodhue is having an underwhelming year and Jordie Barrett isn’t a wing.

I get that Mo’unga collected a big haul of points in Bledisloe III, but I go back to the question of who was he actually playing against? Put Beauden Barrett at first five-eighth in Sydney and he’d have carved Australia up too.

The reason we all got carried away after Wellington was because we’d seen a contest. Weeks on, people still talk about how much they enjoyed that test.

Saturday in Sydney was momentarily entertaining, but it was never a contest. The only interest was in seeing how clinical the All Blacks could be.

New Zealand’s netball team have just completed a 3-0 series win over England. The second test was by far the most enjoyable, because New Zealand’s flaws were first exposed and then exploited.

As the good teams do, the Silver Ferns adjusted and responded and went on to win 54-47. The margins of victory might’ve been larger in each of the other matches, but neither performance was as impressive as that one.

This All Blacks team has its flaws too. Flaws that, at this rate, won’t be exposed until we’re another year through the world cup cycle.

People can wax lyrical about these players, they can praise Foster and his staff. But until we see them all put under pressure, we’ve got no idea if they’re actually any good.

ADVERTISEMENT

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

E
EvilMockingJay 1 hour ago
Antoine Dupont missing for now as Galthie names 33-man France squad

Oh but we want that Cup too ! But SA and NZ don't want to play fair with us xD France is a strong team but not enough to win a final, a semi or a quarter at 16 against 15 xD

Like in 2023, there was 27 (!!!) “mistakes” from BOK against us. Fallen for 1 point. Can't say we would have won against England (who were robbed too, and fallen for 1 point too) and NZ after but I personally believe so. England was pretty weak, getting beated again and again by France and we humilated the Blacks during the opening match. Again 2011 and also 1995… it’s normal not to win every time, after all we are not the only team that play to win. But being robbed every time you have a real chance (or just you were winning no question ask without a ref who suddently stop following the rules of rugby) is harsh. There is voices in France that are starting to say “screw this corrupt World Rugby and screw this RWC, let’s just play our Top14, after all we will never win a World Cup because it is rigged to let a SH team win”. And when you see how it goes (terrible ref being promoted to a RWC final, change in the rules when we are specialists about it, that stupid 20’ red card that encourage brutality from players and partiality from ref and always for or against the same team, forward pass not seen when it’s the other team doing them, same with offsides…) what can you say to these people ? I keep the faith one day we will get that WC, but after 2023, at home, it’s hard to say to these people “no you are wrong”. Like France (one country among a lot of other countries) were robbed 3 times. That’s a lot for ONE country and one competition taking place only every 4 years. And we ain't the only ones robbed. Always by the same teams : RSA or NZ.



...

105 Go to comments
E
EvilMockingJay 2 hours ago
Antoine Dupont missing for now as Galthie names 33-man France squad

Oh yeah, i was meaning 8 in the starting 15 at Toulouse in top14. Wasn’t counting bench or CC or 6N ^^. That’s partly why I told you Galthié did not learn from what happened in 2023. When Dupont became available, bam, your going to Marcoussis. Like man, let him play with his club for a bit first don't trow him against national teams right away... Exactly the same situation as 2023…

I already know what is going to happen in 2027. Last (or the one before, you know, i don't see japanese team doing such a dirty move, but samoa ? Oh yeah, i’m clearly seeing that coming) pool match Dupont will get hit and will be out of the competition with another big injury. Probably not going to happen for NTK, because without Dupont he’s just not at international level at all and everyone saw it. Meaning will get something like Lucu (or Le Garrec)/NTK (because he wants so badly NTK on the field) and we will loose. Again. Lucu, Le Garrec, Jauneau and Jalibert—they’re nothing more than stopgaps for Galthié. He just wants Dupont and NTK, and that’s it. He’d make them play against the Boks or the All Blacks even on one leg. That’s pretty sad being unable to work with 9 and 10 jersey considering we are the nation with the most of international 9s possible. And everyone (except Ben Smith the troll) envy us MJ at number 10… as you said i would love to see both ST and UBB half-backs in the same match but it ain't gonna happen. I’m not a fan of the idea too put MJ at number 15 (did he ever took that place even in his club ?), his talent is more the one of a real fly-half than a full back. Would be wasting both his talent as 10 and Ramos precision for conversions, but that’s only my opinion since we never saw him play 15, maybe i judge him to harsh. Ain’t a problem against Australia (they are in a really poor state) but facing the Boks ? Naah, too experimental.



...

105 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close