This Springboks' loss is a blessing in disguise
Fans of the Springboks won’t be happy to hear it, but the team’s one-point loss to Wales in Bloemfontein is not only a positive for world rugby, but also for the development of the South African game as well. And though the sting of defeat will pinch sharply, the lasting impacts could shape this reverse into a pivotal moment on the path to the next World Cup.
Let us first acknowledge that the 23 Jacques Nienaber selected was not his A team. Yes, any group of men wearing the famous green and gold is representing a brand that regards victory as a non-negotiable. And yes, there were star names littered across the field that were capable of carrying their compatriots to a higher level.
But let’s not allow ourselves to get swept up in forced romanticism. Any squad that includes six uncapped players and 14 changes from the previous Test has to be seen for what it is – an experiment, a work in progress, a Hail Mary shot that something might stick.
Had Wales lost to this group it would have underlined just how far the organisation had fallen. Their first ever win on South African soil does not plaster over a disastrous Six Nations, the board’s fragmented youth infrastructure or a calamitous showing in the United Rugby Championship, but it is a milestone worthy of praise. No caveats are needed for this historic achievement.
There is, however, an argument to be made that scraping past such an experienced outfit is further proof that Wayne Pivac cannot get the best out of his charges. But a defeat might have been terminal, if not to his job 14 months out from the World Cup in France then at least to the faith in him shown from the Welsh public and the players.
This win breathes some life into a spluttering giant. Wales might not have the resources of South Africa and England, but they are a global force. At least they have been in recent times. Schadenfreude is a powerful emotion and one frequently expressed concerning rugby matters but Wales is an integral part of the rugby ecosystem. The game needs diversity and a range of would-be champions. If this boost kickstarts the project then we all have cause for celebration.
As for the Springboks and their loyal supporters, this defeat is the reality check they sorely needed. It has been a golden period for South African rugby. A World Cup win, a Lions series triumph and two finalists in the inaugural URC. Success breeds success but it also breeds expectation.
The Springboks are held to a higher standard than any other institution – sporting or otherwise – in South Africa. They embody a particular breed of South African masculinity that does not take a step back, that confronts challenges with a square jaw and an iron fist. Is it any wonder Trevor Nyakane and Bongi Mbonami have both compared the opposition’s scrum to a home invader trying to do harm to their families?
This is why it hurts when they lose. If our bravest and strongest can succumb to foreign bullies then what hope do the rest of us have? The Springboks are portrayed, and proudly portray themselves, as defenders of the nation. They win despite the rolling blackouts, the murderous crime rates, the rampant unemployment and corrupt politicians. They win even under the cloud of a pandemic and World Rugby’s draconian mandates. They are the beacons in the darkness. The righteous among the damned.
When they win it is easy to conflate their victories with some moral justice. Siya Kolisi is not just a rugby player and inspirational captain of a well-oiled team. He is a warrior prophet fulfilling his preordained destiny. If that seems hyperbolic, go and watch the scenes of the 2019 World Cup victory parade. Those tears shed by South Africans of all races and creeds were not merely the crescendo of their joy. They were visceral signs of a country relishing a rare explosion of ubiquitous joy.
And with every success the narrative calcified. It’s a narrative connected with Nelson Mandela and his rainbow idealism. It is a narrative connected to colonialism and the continued insecurity that pervades the collective psyche. It is a narrative that inflates the significance of mauls and scrums and line-outs to the point where their outcomes say as much about the worthiness of South Africans as they do about the credentials of the Springboks coaching staff.
Josh Adams’ late try put a dent in the mythology. It bloodied the nose of a heavyweight not accustomed to lying prone on the canvas. There have been other losses in recent times – against Australia, England and New Zealand – but this one was perhaps needed. If South Africa’s second-stringers could roll up and roll over Wales’ best, that confidence might have morphed into hubris.
The more pragmatic rugby observers might have predicted a tough afternoon for the South Africans on Saturday, but there were many among us who had the home side as favourites despite the personnel changes.
Andre Esterhuizne struggled to replicate his bulldozing heroics with Harlequins and Handre Pollard failed to shine behind a pack bereft of its usual grunt. Jaden Hendrikse at scrum-half was the one fresh face who advanced his cause. Everyone else outside of the regulars might have woken up this morning and questioned their future in the side.
That is a positive for South African rugby. Winning Tests shouldn’t be easy. And for a team that enjoys “playing in the gutter”, as several players have said, a defeat is just what they needed. Now with a grievance as fuel, they should be back to their best next week.
Comments on RugbyPass
Jake White is a brilliant coach and a master in the press. This is another masterclass in media relations and PR but its also a very narrow view with arguments that dont always hold water. White wants his team to win, he wants the best players in SA and wants his team competitive. You however have to face up to the reality of a poor exchange rate and big clubs with big budgets. SA Rugby cant compete and unless it can find more money SA players will keep leaving regardless of Springbok eligibility and this happened in 2015 - 2017. Also rugby is not cricket. Cricket has 3 formats and T20 cricket is where the money is at. When it comes to club vs country the IPL is king but that wont happen because the international calendar does not clash with the club calendar in rugby. So the argument about rugby going down the same path as cricket is really a non-starter
13 Go to commentsNZ rugby seem not to have learnt anything from professional rugby. Super rugby was dying and SA left before they died with the competition. SA rugby did a u turn on their approach to international players playing overseas and such players are now selected for Bok teams. As much as each country would love to retain their players playing in local competitions, this is the way the world is evolving my friends. Move with it or stay 20 years behind the times. One more thing. NZ rugby hierarchy think they are the big cheese. Take a more humble approach guys. You do not seem to have your players best interests at heart.
3 Go to commentsBeaches? In Cardiff? Where?
1 Go to commentsHe is right , the Crusaders will be a threat. Scott Barrett, ( particularly), Fergus Burke , Codie Taylor, ( from sabbatical) etc due back soon for the Crusaders. There are others like Zach Gallagher too. People can right the Crusaders off, Top 8 , here we come !!
1 Go to commentsWe will always struggle for money to match the other sides but the least the WRU can do is invest properly in Welsh rugby. Too much has been squandered on vanity projects like the hotel and roof walk amongst others which will never see a massive return. Hanging the 4 pro sides out to dry over the last decade is now coming back to bite the WRU financially as well as on the pitch. You reap what you sow.
1 Go to commentsWhat do you get if you cross a doctor with a fish? A plastic sturgeon
14 Go to commentsWhat happened to feleti Kaitu’u? Hasnt played in a while right?
1 Go to commentsGregor I just can’t agree with you. You are trying to find something that just isn’t there. Jordie Barrett has signed until 2028. By the end of that he would have spent probably 11-12 years on Super Rugby and you say he can’t possibly have one season playing somewhere else. It is absurd. What about this scenario, the NZR play hard ball and he decides to leave and play overseas. How would that affect the competition. There seems to be an agenda by certain journalists to push certain agendas and don’t like it when it’s not to their liking. I fully support the NZR on this. Gregor needs to get a life.
3 Go to commentsHope he stays as believe he can do a great job.
1 Go to commentsMake what step up? Manie has a World Cup winner’s medal around his neck and changed the way the Springboks can play. He doesn’t have anything to prove to anyone. The win record of the Boks with him in the team is tremendous. Sacha can be wonderful and I hope he has a very succesful Bok career, but comparing him to Manie in terms of the next Bok flyhalf is very strange. Manie is the incumbent (not the next) and doing pretty incredibly.
1 Go to comments00 😍 U
1 Go to commentsSabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.
3 Go to commentsJake White talks more sense than anything I've read in the last 5 years. Hope someone's listening.
13 Go to commentsThe Springboks tried going down the road of only picking home-based players and it was an unmitigated disaster in 2016 and 2017. Picking overseas-based players has been one of the main reason the Boks have done so well since 2018, not only because of the quality Rassie could call on, but because of the knowledge and experience those players brought into camp from England, France and Japan. With some of the big names playing abroad it also gave younger players in SA the chance to break through at franchise level. Would we have seen the emergence of a Ruan Nortje if RG and Lood were still at the Bulls? Not so sure. I understand why Jake would want to block players leaving since his job depends on good results but it’s an approach that would take Bok rugby back to the bad old days and no South African wants to see that.
13 Go to commentsExeter were thumped by 38 points. And they only had to hop on a train.
39 Go to commentsI am De Groot.
1 Go to commentsHad hoped you might write an article on this game, Nick. It’s a good one. Things have not gone as smoothly for ROG since beating Leinster last year at the Aviva in the CC final. LAR had the Top 14 Final won till Raymond Rhule missed a simple tackle on the excellent Ntamack, and Toulouse reaped the rewards of just staying in the fight till the death. Then the disruption of the RWC this season. LAR have not handled that well, but they were not alone, and we saw Pau heading the Top 14 table at one stage early season. I would think one of the reasons for the poor showing would have to be that the younger players coming through, and the more mature amongst the group outside the top 25/30, are not as strong as would be hoped for. I note that Romain Sazy retired at the end of last season. He had been with LAR since 2010, and was thus one of their foundation players when they were promoted to Top 14. Records show he ended up with 336 games played with LAR. That is some experience, some rock in the team. He has been replaced for the most part by Ultan Dillane. At 30, Dillane is not young, but given the chances, he may be a fair enough replacement for Sazy. But that won’be for more than a few years. I honestly know little of the pathways into the LAR setup from within France. I did read somewhere a couple of years ago that on the way up to Top 14, the club very successfully picked up players from the academies of other French teams who were not offered places by those teams. These guys were often great signings…can’t find the article right now, so can’t name any….but the Tadgh Beirne type players. So all in all, it will be interesting to see where the replacements for all the older players come from. Only Lleyd’s and Rhule from SA currently, both backs. So maybe a few SA forwards ?? By contrast, Leinster have a pretty clear line of good players coming through in the majority of positions. Props maybe a weak spot ? And they are very fleet footed and shrewd in appointing very good coaches. Or maybe it is also true that very good coaches do very well in the Leinster setup. So, Nick, I would fully concurr that “On the evidence of Saturday’s semi-final between the two clubs, the rebuild in the Bay of Biscay is going to take longer than it is on the east coast of Ireland”
11 Go to commentsWhat was the excuse for the other knockout blowouts then? Does the result not prove the Saints were just so much better? Wise call to put your eggs in one basket when you’ve got 2 comps simultaneously finishing.
39 Go to commentsReally hope Kuruvoli and his partner rock the Canes.
1 Go to commentsI wonder what impact Samson has had on their attack, as the team seems less prone to trundle it up the middle, take the tackle and then trundle it up again. I lost faith in the coach last year as the Rebelss looked like a 2nd/3rd rate South African team. I also disliked Gordon standing back, often ignored as the forward battle went on and on. Maybe its our Aussie way of not getting off our A***’s until the enemy is at the gate.
86 Go to comments