Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

The Rugby World Cup weekend that nobody wanted

By Sam Roberts
Amanaki Mafi sheds a tear

It is true. For all the good that sport does, the way it can reach into the soul and nourish your nether regions, it doesn’t always give us what we want.

ADVERTISEMENT

Our love affair with Japanese rugby was relatively simple. Its roots entwined with those of the game we cherish: respect, generous hospitality and a way of playing that allows the ball to do the work. Nothing beats nostalgia and Japan’s offloading seemed to belong to a different era; one before dominant hits and choke tackles had taken the air from the game. Ireland and Scotland had both succumbed. Japan had bobbed and weaved agonisingly out of reach, popped the ball into eager hands too swift for Gaelic grasping, and in doing so, we’d all become a little smitten.

Japan dejection
Kotaro Matsushima and Keita Inagaki react following Japan’s defeat in Tokyo (Photo by Cameron Spencer/Getty Images)

Rugby has forever told us, it is for all shapes and sizes; where crafted technique can overcome brute strength; where a fleet-footed imp can make a towering giant look a little daft; and where, after everything, everyone gets a drink. Of late, however, the Goliaths have ruled the game. And in a way, we’ve let them. Big men have only been bested by bigger men as the sport has chased stature and not skill. The camera dipped and rose as it went along the Japanese line devotedly sobbing their anthem. This was a team of normal-shaped men who’d redefined what could be done on a rugby pitch: how could you not love them?

Japan players look on dejected after losing to South Africa.

But love is for fools. And sport rarely suffers them. Sport adores professionalism, practice, hard work; those who reduce risk, make the right choice, punish the mistake: it is unforgiving. As were South Africa; executing a one-dimensional game plan that hammered thud after agonising thud at Japanese flanks. For a while, the Cherry Blossoms swallowed the pain; attempted to keep the wheeze going, smiling through cracked ribs at all those who still believed. But it was just a question of time. Four years of ignominy is time enough. Revenge is not just best served cold, you want to serve it up in someone’s capital city.

Speaking of ignominy and capital cities: England are requited. Forty points upon an old foe were bewitching yet seemingly unsurprising as Australia’s own unrepentant Jones dealt out defeat for the seventh time. Familiarity breeds contempt. The Wallaby wilt was almost rueful. It could prove to be Pocock’s last. A man whose impressive thighs have bestrode the game and reinvented how you make the breakdown yours. It was he who threw the loose pass that unleashed Slade, and subsequently May. I wanted something greater for him and the reborn Lealiifano. Two of rugby’s finest names in recent years. Strength on and off the field. I wanted more. Yet England sacked them short.

ADVERTISEMENT
David Pocock finished
David Pocock walks off the pitch in Oita following Australia’s loss to England. (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)

Short may well be Schmidt’s Irish epitaph: short of realising a World Cup final four. It will talk at length about how they beat the All Blacks twice but little about what happened in Japan. England’s Australian victory had barely cooled as New Zealand bore a knowing, toothy grin. This is an Irish team with the memory of how to be a great side but not the mode. For all their experience, there just didn’t seem enough air in the lungs. The All Blacks stuck a hand on all those famous shoulders and plunged a gasping Ireland deep. Best walked from the field shaking his head. It should not have ended like this.

Rugby World Cup
Rory Best and Joe Schmidt

And no one does endings like the French. Few do rugby like them either. Ollivon’s eighth-minute score was as sleek a try as you’ll see at this World Cup. Ntamack and Penaud have hips of yesteryear and it was all Wales could do to hold on. But hold on they did. Wainwright’s wheels and Biggar’s boot claimed ten points of their own and it was just nine points difference at the half. Yet, astonishingly, fourteen men with half an hour to go. A player with a big name, tall frame and an even larger ability to let his team down: Sebastian Vahaamahina elbowing a World Cup semi-final spectacularly out of reach. Not really what anyone wanted, save the Welsh.

ADVERTISEMENT

And yet here we are. No upset, no romantic line, no heroic story to regale. Just the four best teams in the world and two semi-finals impossible to call.

If sport doesn’t always give us what we want, it’s because we probably don’t know what’s best for us.

This article first appeared on samrobertsrugby.com and is re-published here with permission.

RugbyPass went off the beaten track to an iconic Maid Cafe in Akihabara, Tokyo.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 8

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Steelers v Sungoliath | Full Match Replay

Rugby Europe Women's Championship | Netherlands v Spain

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Senzo Cicero 18 hours ago
'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in'

1. True, if that “free” ticket means access to all but the prized exhibit - EVIP only. SA cannot host semis, even if they’ve earned it (see Sharks vs ASM Clermont Auvergne at… Twickenham Stoop). 2. Why no selective outrage over Lyon doing the exact same thing a week earlier? Out of all the countries France send the most “B teams”, why nobody talking about “disrespect” and “prioritising domestic leagues” and “kicking them out”? 3. Why no mention of the Sharks fielding all of their Springboks for the second rate Challenge cup QF? No commitment? 4. Why no mention of all the SA teams qualifying for respective euro knock out comps in the two seasons they’ve been in it? How many euro teams have qualified for KO’s in their history? Can’t compete? 5. Why no mention of SA teams beating French and English giants La Rochelle and Saracens? How many euro teams have done that in their history? Add no quality? The fact is that SA teams are only in their second season in europe, with no status and a fraction of the resources. Since joining the URC, SA has seen a repatriation of a number of players, and this will only grow once SA start sharing in the profits of competing in these comps, meaning bigger squads with greater depth and quality, meaning they don’t have to prioritise comps as they have to now - they don’t have imports from Pacifica and South America and everywhere else in between like “European” teams have - also less “Saffas” in Prem and T14, that’s what we want right? 'If the South Africans are in, they need to be all in' True, and we have to ensure we give them the same status and resources as we give everyone else to do just that. A small compromise on scheduling will go a long way in avoiding these situations, but guess what, France and England wont compromise on scheduling because they ironically… prioritise their domestic comps, go figure!

21 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Scotland dealt double injury blow as Bath issue Finn Russell update Scotland dealt double injury blow as Bath issue Finn Russell update
Search