Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The case for Steve Borthwick keeping his job

Englands's Head Coach Steve Borthwick during the Guinness Six Nations 2026 match between England and Ireland at Allianz Stadium on February 21, 2026 in London, England. (Photo by Bob Bradford - CameraSport via Getty Images)

Steve Borthwick has been no stranger to pressure and public scrutiny during his tenure as England head coach, but the heat he is currently facing is of biblical proportions and dwarfs anything he experienced in the autumn of 2024.

ADVERTISEMENT

England’s loss to Italy on Saturday – their first ever – has turned a slump in form into a full-blown crisis and the knives are now out for the England boss.

The RFU have given him their backing, for the time being, but their statement can be read in a multitude of ways, and that may not fill him with supreme confidence.

VIDEO

Of course, there is a compelling case for Borthwick to lose his position. His selections during the Guinness Six Nations have been widely questioned, and England’s performances and manner of play have been worse. The substitutions he has made have often felt like hopeful rolls of the dice in the closing stages of matches rather than anything methodical or tactical. Those factors alone are damning and could be enough for him to lose his job.

While there is a veritable tidal wave of figures calling for his sacking, there is still a case for him to keep his job beyond the Six Nations.

Fixture
Six Nations
France
13:10
14 Mar 26
England
All Stats and Data

Lions fatigue 
Over the past decade, England’s anni horribiles have all come after a British and Irish Lions series. England finished fifth in the Six Nations in 2018, saw Eddie Jones sacked in 2022, and now seem to be experiencing an even more calamitous fallout due to greater representation in the 2025 Lions squad and when contrasted to heights they reached last year.

There is no doubt that England’s Lions contingent have not been at the level we’re used to. Captain Maro Itoje has had to battle with injury and personal tragedy since returning from Australia and can be totally forgiven for being emotionally and physically exhausted. He was probably having his best game since the summer against Italy, but a quick string of penalties around the hour mark that resulted in his yellow card are the hallmarks of lapses in concentration induced by fatigue (although the slap for the yellow card was dubious).

ADVERTISEMENT

Itoje is in no way alone, though. Ellis Genge has been strong in the scrum but has also had some costly errors in his performances. Luke Cowan-Dickie was substituted before half-time against Ireland, Tom Curry has been better used in cameos as a substitute and Tommy Freeman has been blunted in attack, to name just a few examples.

Of course, other nations have had Lions players to manage as well – Ireland had the most on tour. But across the teams playing in round four, England actually had the highest number of players who were originally named in Andy Farrell’s Lions squad, 11, including Tom Curry, who withdrew minutes before the match. Jamie George also joined midway through the tour.

Ireland’s Ulster-heavy influence against Wales perhaps suggests they have rotated their squad more effectively in the wake of the Lions tour. That is something Borthwick has not been as successful in managing. He is therefore partly to blame for failing to rest some of his Lions players, but he has been let down by core members of his group who are simply exhausted.

A complete rest over the summer may actually do those players some good, particularly with the World Cup on the horizon.

ADVERTISEMENT

Injuries
An argument can be made that England were without six players who would likely have been part of their ideal starting XV in Rome, or at least the matchday squad.

Tom Curry was a late withdrawal, while Alex Mitchell, Ollie Lawrence, Immanuel Feyi-Waboso, Fin Baxter and Will Stuart would all have been in and around a starting XV. George Martin, Ben Curry and even George Furbank, though fit now, are also long-term absentees. This has undoubtedly damaged England, but it has been felt most keenly in the final quarter of matches.

England’s previously vaunted ‘Pom Squad’ offered little impact as they trundled onto the Stadio Olimpico pitch at various stages. If anything, the substitutions made by Borthwick weakened the side rather than strengthened it, as they had done during the autumn.

While he can be blamed for the timing of substitutions, the players he had at his disposal were a result of the injury crisis England are currently experiencing.

With the injured contingent available, England’s performances would surely have been different.

22m Entries

Avg. Points Scored
2.4
7
Entries
Avg. Points Scored
1.5
10
Entries

Discipline
England have haemorrhaged penalties throughout the Championship and have averaged two yellow cards per match, one of which resulted in a red card for Henry Arundell against Scotland.

They have hit double figures for penalties conceded in every match. Some of these have been down to England’s clumsiness, profligacy and inefficiency at the breakdown on both sides of the ball, as well as the pressure they have found themselves under due to their weak defence. But there have also been some crass decisions taken by players that Borthwick can hardly be blamed for.

Arundell’s second yellow card against Scotland was scarcely the responsibility of a coach, just as Sam Underhill’s against Italy was not either. Underhill is usually a disciplined tackler.

Itoje’s yellow card in Rome seemed to epitomise the asinine thinking that appears rife in the England team at the moment, which may be a product of the pressure they are under.

The coaching team can certainly be blamed for penalties that arise from England’s tactical shortcomings, but the players equally need to take responsibility for some of the penalties they have been leaking.

Errors like England’s are not called coach killers for nothing.

2025
Victory has a thousand fathers, but defeat is an orphan.

When England were on their 12-match winning run across 2025 and into the first match of 2026, many figures were praised. It was the attacking impetus of Lee Blackett, the defensive influence of Byron McGuigan, the leadership of Maro Itoje and the tactical nous of George Ford.

Now that things have turned sour, the fingers are being pointed squarely at Borthwick, and to a lesser extent Ford.

Though England’s winning run, which lifted them to third in the world, now seems like a distant memory, it must be remembered that Borthwick took them to those heights just a matter of months ago.

Even if he does lose his job, he deserves credit for that.

He’s been here before
England are in a similar position to the one they found themselves in in 2022, when Eddie Jones was sacked at the end of the year and replaced by Borthwick.

After a shaky 2023 Six Nations, Borthwick guided England to within one long-range penalty from South Africa’s Handré Pollard of reaching the World Cup final less than a year after taking over.

Admittedly, that run came while playing some fairly turgid rugby, but it did show that Borthwick has the credentials to turn a ship around.

However, whereas he inherited a mess created by Eddie Jones in 2022, he is now dealing with a mess he has largely created himself. That may make turning things around far more difficult this time, and that could make all the difference.

Related

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

19 Comments
J
John Breslin 2 hours ago

Governance is still the issue, still their own worst enemy


They bomb a home RWC 2015 (despite the mitigation of a pool of death that had the potential to be a 4 way shootout) and the RFU have to look decisive.


Ignoring their own failings (trying to turn a big budget league player into a test level union player across a few pitch sessions) they sack two excellent coaches, developed by their own system - Farrell and Lancaster. Neither of whom would go anywhere near the RFU again, if only out of self respect.


They get Eddie on the credentials of beating a tier one team with minnows in a RWC pool game. He gets them ticking and restores a bit of the required arrogance but it was obvious he only had a one cycle self life. They go again with him and line up Borthwick, then sack Eddie early.


Borthwick is now on a £700k a year contract without even a performance clause locked in. Maybe they can't afford to sack him?


This could be their second consecutive world cup cycle that they have to sack a head coach during the cycle. Terrible business

H
Hammer Head 4 hours ago

Unless the RFU finds a world class replacement - worthy of taking on the 18 month hospital pass to 2027 - I think it makes more sense to hold on bombing Borthwick and cut some of his assistants.


Perhaps do what NZ did with Foz in 22 and bring in someone Ike Joe Schmidt to the WC.


The timing is terrible because decent coaches are tied up to 2027, even the club ones.


To what extent is it better to see out the next 18 and get your house in order for the next cycle?

T
Tom 2 hours ago

Agreed. They should bring in someone very long in the tooth with a no nonsense attitude to try and shake things up until the WC then look long term post WC when coaches are negotiating contracts.

u
unknown 3 hours ago

There is no sense in keeping Borthwick he is hopeless. Hell even getting Conor O’Shea to cover for 18 months would be better than having to endure a minute more of Borthwick and his mind numbingly dull idea of how to play rugby.


It’s only a hospital pass if you’re not adventurous. Someone should look at the opportunity and think I basically can go in and have a free hit at it for 18 months (can do any worse than the incumbent) and if they’re successful then keen them on or they can depart having been well paid for 18 months. It’s a mindset and perception one and we need someone with a positive mindset

L
Lee Gregory 4 hours ago

Bore-thwicks time is done. Hopefully the RFU are just backing him until the end of the 6N. With any luck France beat us, hear me out, to ensure the final nail in the coffin is placed and secured.


The only sticking point is whether the RFU can afford to get rid of Bore-thwick, what with finances tight and his contract termination likely to be in the 2 million pound mark to terminate. I can't imagine that the RFU will all too happy with having to take such a hit.

u
unknown 2 hours ago

Maybe the RFU should put in break clauses for under performance or even better appoint someone capable and competent in the first place. The RFU have to suck it up or risk future commercial hits when attendances drop, sponsors shy away and merchandise revenue declines

A
AA 4 hours ago

After 2 bad defeats, Borthwick made 9 changes but made them play the same rugby that lost those games. Has anyone any confidence Borthwick can actually come up with an attacking strategy that mixes kicking with heads up running rugby when its possible.

The players look scared to express themselves. Why wasnt Marcus bought on at 10 to spice things up . He at least shows passion and flair. 7 minutes at the end . I ask you.

The Italy game was where Borthwick could have shown he could improve things and he failed again .

The answer will unfortunately be painfully obvious after the France game.

P
PMcD 5 hours ago

It’s a tricky moment for Steve Borthwick and is a tough decision for the RFU to make.


Steve’s been in charge for nearly 3 years, hasn’t won anything, improved the team last year and then relapsed, whilst struggling to inspire the fans with game tactics and playing style.


I do believe the Lions fatigue & injuries have played their part but equally, the failure of selection, tactical subs etc does come back on Steve and it’s pretty clear he has been out classed by Townsend, Farrell & Queso this 6N’s, which does question his capability as a coach.


Personally, I believe we would have a better chance at RWC 2027 with either John Mitchell, or Michael Cheika, so if either were available (they should be), I would endorse a change and believe they will stand a better chance of delivering meaningful success.


Borthers has had his chance and struggled and I just don’t see the evidence to see how we will beat these teams playing the game strategy & tactics he has committed to with this team and he is too conflicted to go all in with the Saints style of play.


Sadly, I think his time has come to an end and it’s time for change with a more experienced coaching team.

T
Tom 5 hours ago

Never before have we lost to either Italy or Fiji. We're playing the most turgid rugby in the entire world. All other nations have moved to playing a much more dynamic game. Borthwick has stuck dogmatically to his approach of box kicking the leather off the ball at every opportunity despite no other team in world rugby doing it. It's not the losses that are the problem it's the unwillingness and inability to move with the times. Not to mention his appalling record with assistance coaches - the best two coaches he's appointed - one of them jumped ship to be unemployed rather than work for Borthwick and anl promising new attack coach who's being so micromanaged by Wigglesworth that all we’re allowed to do is box kicking. Besides that he's appointed various mates with no experience to senior coaching roles and then sidelining them into other positions their equally unqualified for when they inevitably fail. On top of all this we get the same tropes about how England have made so much progress and they're on the verge of something great while the rest of the world outside of his echo chamber of self appointed, delusional sycophants can see we're trying to play rugby from a bygone age with no modern precedent for success.

P
PMcD 5 hours ago

After 3 years, it’s really a simple question;


“Do you believe Steve Borthwick can lead this team to victory at RWC 2027?” . . . . and even his die hard supporters would have to say it’s unlikely, so then we ask do we stick with a coach we believe will underwhelm, or are there other options that could have a different outcome.


Then the decision becomes very interesting, as in Mitchell & Cheika, you have two coaches that can and would make a big difference from where we are and how we are playing today.

u
unknown 6 hours ago

Simple answer is there isn’t a case to be made. His tenure has yielded no tangible success, had a lot of low points and left supporters having to endure the dullest style of rugby going. Time for Borthwick to go!

u
unknown 6 hours ago

‘The Case for Steve Borthwick keeping his job’ should be one of the shortest articles ever written .. and sit alongside such literary epics as ‘The list of Italian war heroes’ .. ‘French Border Control successes in the English Channel’!

B
Bob Salad II 6 hours ago

Jeez. I just read that and now feel even more convinced Borthwick should go. You were making a case for him to be retained, right?

u
unknown 6 hours ago

Totally agree. Lions fatigue and injuries - well Ireland and Scotland have the same issues but they’ve done ok. 2025 papered over the cracks and wasn’t that impressive when closely analysed. As for he’s been here before then surely that is an issue in itself as he has allowed the team to regress to being in a dire position again. Discipline can be coached so he has to take some responsibility for this and his tactics of constantly giving the ball away mean the probability of conceding pens/cards will increase. There is no case made for retaining Borthwick when these points are objectively assessed

S
SB 6 hours ago

Fair points. But for me, these sound like excuses overall.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

Close
ADVERTISEMENT