Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Springboks player ratings vs Romania | Rugby World Cup 2023

By Daniel Gallan
South Africa v Romania – Rugby World Cup 2023 – Pool B – Matmut Atlantique Stadium

Springboks player ratings: A hard one to judge, really. They were obviously the better side and the 76-0 scoreline would suggest everyone gets a 10. But the opposition should be factored in and there were some below par displays. Still, a great day out and the world champions go marching on.

ADVERTISEMENT

15 – Willie le Roux – 9
The try assist machine continues. Also showed some clean heels for a geezer. A complete game.

14 – Grant Williams – 8
A few mazy runs showed off his pace, and he certainly went looking for work, played some neat touches out wide and beat 10 defenders across the match that included a brace.

13 – Canan Moodie – 5
Should have played a pass for Hendrikse inside him after a lovely break. Otherwise relatively quiet.

12 – Andre Esterhuizen – 8
Some particularly meaty carries through the middle with almost all of them ending with him crashing over the gainline.

11 – Makazole Mapimpi – 9
Made almost 200 metres with ball in hand, scored three tries and was always looking to get involved. Is it enough to start against Ireland?

10 – Damian Willemse – 7.5
Missed his first shot at goal and played a couple of aimless kicks. Involved in a few try assists and also notched one himself. Some fizzing passes and a few sidesteps, most notably for his disallowed try , but it was a performance that didn’t exactly scream ‘control’. Replaced by Faf de Klerk on 56 minutes.

ADVERTISEMENT

9 – Cobus Reinach – 9
His blitz hat-trick stole the show in the first half but it was his control at the base of the ruck, especially with his box kicking, that will please the Boks coaches most. Subbed for Jaden Hendrikse five minutes into the second half.

Related


1 – Ox Nche – 9

Carried with great intensity and scrummed like a machine. Won’t get many easier assignments as the competition goes on. Subbed for Frans Malherbe on the hour mark.

2 – Bongi Mbonambi – 8
Secure at the line-out and fulfilled his role as captain well. Replaced by Deon Fourie at half time.

3 – Trevor Nyakane – 8
Scrummed like a menace and was active throughout the match. Tougher assignments await. Subbed for Steven Kitshoff on the hour.

ADVERTISEMENT

4 – Jean Kleyn – 8
Great awareness to pounce on the loose ball for one of Reinach’s tries. Also a giant in the line-out and around the park.

5 – Marvin Orie – 8
A titan in the line-out. Still lacking that grunt of the other Boks but a decent hit out. Replaced by RG Snyman at half time.

6 – Marco van Staden – 7
Unlucky not to get on the score sheet in the first half. Also lent his hand in the line-out throws.

7 – Kwagga Smith – 8
A menace at the breakdown. Stole numerous balls on the ground and contributed when it got loose.

Related

8 – Duane Vermeulen – 8
Secure. Integral at the restart. Stood over the ball when called upon to do so. Just a colossal player

16 – Deon Fourie – 8
Scored a try but it was his accuracy at the line-out that will be the thing he remembers most. Maybe the Boks won’t miss Malcolm Marx as much as they thought?

17 – Steven Kitshoff – 8
A wonderful run down the tram almost ended with him scoring the best prop try of all time.

18 – Frans Malherbe – 8
The scrum pillar did as he always does. Not a shabby day’s work when he wasn’t expected to play.

19 – RG Snyman – 8
A totem in the line-out and the restart. A gift for the South African coaches.

20 – Jasper Wiese – N/A

21 – Jaden Hendrikse – 7
Some lovely snipes around the fringe. Helped by a broken game.

22 – Faf de Klerk – 8
Maybe he can play 10. Some wonderful short passes against the grain to set up runners on the angle. Will have to face tougher defences than that but proved what he can do on the front foot.

23 – Jesse Kriel – N/A

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

The Antoine Dupont Interview

Ireland v New Zealand | Singapore Men's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

New Zealand v Australia | Singapore Women's HSBC SVNS Final Highlights

Inter Services Championships | Royal Army Men v Royal Navy Men | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

W
Wayneo 16 minutes ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

Some interesting stats that just proved what my first impression of NZ’s drive to speed up Rugby Union would amount to - fine margins here and there to cut a few seconds off the game and nothing else. To do more there would have to be wholesale changes to the game like doing away with scrums, lineouts and bringing back the ELV’s to have free kicks instead of penalties. Very little chance of it happening but, in the end, Ruby Union would be a 15-man version of Rugby League. There are reasons why Rugby Union is globally more popular that Rugby League and what NZ are also not considering is the unintended consequences of what they want to achieve. This will end up turning Rugby Union into a low value product that will not be acceptable to the paying public. If people really wanted a sped-up version of rugby, then why is Rugby Union globally way more popular than Rugby League? Rugby lovers all over the world are also not stupid and have seen through what NZ are trying to achieve here, selfishly to bring back their glory days of dominance over every other nation and compete with Rugby League that is dominant in Australasia. NH countries just don’t have the cattle, or the fantastic weather needed to play like NZ SR franchises do so good luck to whoever has to try and convince the NH to accept going back to the days of NZ dominance and agreeing to wreck the game in the process. I have serious doubts on the validity of the TV stats presented by GP. All they did was expand the broadcasting base by putting it on free to air, not even any indication of arresting the continued drop in viewership. Match day attendance goes hand in hand with broadcast ratings so if there was an increase in the one you should expect to see it with the other. However, the drop in match day attendance is very evident to the casual highlights package viewer. The only club who looks to be getting solid attendance is the Drua. I am calling it now that NZ’s quest to speed up the game will fail and so will the vote on the 20-minute red card.

10 Go to comments
S
Sam T 1 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

All of these media pundits always miss the obvious whenever they analyse what is ailing or assisting the game. Rugby always has contentious points for debate when picking apart individual games and finding fault with itself. All this focus and scrutiny on “speeding up the game”, “high ball in play” etc is all contextual to the fan. As a tv viewer, if you’re absorbed into a game, regardless if your team is playing or not, more ball in play time and action are all byproducts of the contest. A good contest subliminally affects your memory in selectively remembering all the good aspects. A poor contest and your brain has switched off because its a blowout and the result is never in doubt or it’s a real chore to watch and remain engaged throughout. The URC, Top 14 and English premiership are all competitions that feel like there’s real jeopardy each week. The dominance of Super rugby by NZ teams was unhealthy from a sustainable interest perspective. You can’t fault those teams or the players, but the lack of competitions won by SA and Australian teams long term was always going to test the faith and patience of die-hard and casual fans from those regions. SANZAR took their eye off the fans and fans voted with their feet and subscriptions. They were so concerned about expanding their product they forgot the golden rule about broadcasting live sport. Viewers tune in more when there’s an atmosphere and a true contest. You need to fill stadiums to create one, host unions need to do more to service ticket buyers, and this year proves the other, there’s more interest in Super rugby this year only because more games are competitive with less foregone conclusions. All these micro statistics bandied about, only interest the bean counters and trainspotters.

10 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 7 hours ago
Speeded-up Super Rugby Pacific provides blueprint for wider game

I’m all for speeding up the game. But can we be certain that the slowness of the game contributed to fans walking out? I’m not so sure. Super rugby largely suffered from most fans only being able to, really, follow the games played in their own time zone. So at least a third of the fan base wasn’t engaged at any point in time. As a Saffer following SA teams in the URC - I now watch virtually every European game played on the weekend. In SR, I wouldn’t be bothered to follow the games being played on the other side of the world, at weird hours, if my team wasn’t playing. I now follow the whole tournament and not just the games in my time zone. Second, with New Zealand teams always winning. It’s like formula one. When one team dominates, people lose interest. After COVID, with SA leaving and Australia dipping in form, SR became an even greater one horse race. Thats why I think Japan’s league needs to get in the mix. The international flavor of those teams could make for a great spectacle. But surely if we believe that shaving seconds off lost time events in rugby is going to draw fans back, we should be shown some figures that supports this idea before we draw any major conclusions. Where are the stats that shows these changes have made that sort of impact? We’ve measured down to the average no. Of seconds per game. Where the measurement of the impact on the fanbase? Does a rugby “fan” who lost interest because of ball in play time suddenly have a revived interest because we’ve saved or brought back into play a matter of seconds or a few minutes each game? I doubt it. I don’t thinks it’s even a noticeable difference to be impactful. The 20 min red card idea. Agreed. Let’s give it a go. But I think it’s fairer that the player sent off is substituted and plays no further part in the game as a consequence.

10 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING OTD – Declan Kidney takes step up into Test rugby OTD – Declan Kidney takes step up into Test rugby
Search