Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'I feel horrible saying it. He's not the same player'

By Ian Cameron
cotlands Stuart Hogg and Finn Russell at full time during a Six Nations match between Italy and Scotland (Photo by Ross MacDonald/SNS Group via Getty Images)

Former Scotland second row Jim Hamilton says that the axing of Finn Russell by Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend ‘feels like the right call’.

ADVERTISEMENT

News broke at lunchtime that the Scotland talisman had been dropped to the bench for this Saturday’s Guinness Six Nations showdown with Ireland in Dublin.

Edinburgh’s Blair Kinghorn takes the place of the highly-regarded Racing 92 stand-off, whose performances in this year’s tournament have been the subject of scrutiny from some critics.

Video Spacer

Jamie Noon previews the final round of the Six Nations | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 25

Video Spacer

Jamie Noon previews the final round of the Six Nations | RugbyPass Offload | Episode 25

The omission of Russell, who is named among the replacements, is particularly notable since head coach Gregor Townsend has made only two changes to the side that started last weekend’s bonus-point victory away to Italy.

“It’s a massive call and in my opinion, it feels like the right call,” Hamilton said while discussing the decision with Leicester flyhalf Freddie Burns in live Q&A on the RugbyPass Youtube channel.

“I feel awful saying that because I love Finn. I love him. I love what he’s done for Scottish rugby. I love his character.

“I feel bad saying it. He’s not been the same player. Maybe it is the rocket up his **** that he needs. It shows that he isn’t ‘not droppable’. There’s one player that is undroppable and that’s Hoggy [Stuart Hogg] at 15.

ADVERTISEMENT

“With Hoggy you are getting a seven, eight, nine, ten out of ten performance. Every single game. With Finn you’re getting a ten out of ten, or a six out of ten.

“The last few games we’ve been seeing six out of tens.

“We need to know with the Rugby World Cup, that we’ve got another player who can do it [play flyhalf for Scotland].”

Former England flyhalf Burns said he felt for his fellow playmaker: “As a ten, if you’re behind a dominant pack week after week, you can perform well. When you’re not, and the pack is inconsistent around you, it’s hard.

“When you’ve got those maverick tendencies that Finn does and he’s become so central to everything Scotland have done good in the last few years; you play Scotland you go ‘Stop Finn’.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The Scotland pack is a good pack, don’t get me wrong, but it doesn’t strike the fear of god in you.

“We’ve seen it in a couple of teams this year. You see Semi Radradra at Bristol this year, it almost seems like ‘lob him the ball and do something’. And when they don’t produce everyone goes ‘he’s terrible. His head’s gone’.

Related

“For Finn it might actually be a good thing. As a player you’re never going to go ‘that’s the right decision’ however, I think it might be the case that in six months or a year down the line that they look back realise that dropping Finn for that last game was a good thing for him and Scotland.”

“I feel for him sometimes. Everyone expects that every time he touches the ball to do something. You can’t do that.”

additional reporting PA

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

N
Nickers 7 hours ago
All Blacks sabbaticals ‘damage Super Rugby Pacific when it is fighting for survival’

Sabbaticals have helped keep NZ’s very best talent in the country on long term deals - this fact has been left out of this article. Much like the articles calling to allow overseas players to be selected, yet can only name one player currently not signed to NZR who would be selected for the ABs. And in the entire history of NZ players leaving to play overseas, literally only 4 or 5 have left in their prime as current ABs. (Piatau, Evans, Hayman, Mo’unga,?) Yes Carter got an injury while playing in France 16 years ago, but he also got a tournament ending injury at the 2011 World Cup while taking mid-week practice kicks at goal. Maybe Jordie gets a season-ending injury while playing in Ireland, maybe he gets one next week against the Brumbies. NZR have many shortcomings, but keeping the very best players in the country and/or available for ABs selection is not one of them. Likewise for workload management - players missing 2 games out of 14 is hardly a big deal in the grand scheme of things. Again let’s use some facts - did it stop the Crusaders winning SR so many times consecutively when during any given week they would be missing 2 of their best players? The whole idea of the sabbatical is to reward your best players who are willing to sign very long term deals with some time to do whatever they want. They are not handed out willy-nilly, and at nowhere near the levels that would somehow devalue Super Rugby. In this particular example JB is locked in with NZR for what will probably (hopefully) be the best years of his career, hard to imagine him not sticking around for a couple more after for a Lions tour and one more world cup. He has the potential to become the most capped AB of all time. A much better outcome than him leaving NZ for a minimum of 3 years at the age of 27, unlikely to ever play for the ABs again, which would be the likely alternative.

3 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How agents have helped emerging nations talent triumph How agents have helped emerging nations talent triumph
Search