Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

One Nation Going Backwards Under Warrenball

By Lee Calvert
warren

Despite having one of the most talented squads Wales has ever produced at his disposal, Warren Gatland is no longer getting the results he did three years ago. Lee Calvert suggests a change to his Warrenball coaching philosophies could be in order.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wales have arrived in New Zealand to play a three match test series against the All Blacks, a series which many are predicting for the Welsh will be the rugby equivalent of trying to win an arm wrestle against an angry gorilla.

The signs are not good for the Dragons heading into the opening test this Saturday evening at Eden Park. After a middling 2016 Six Nations campaign, their tour warm-up was lost 27-13 to a second-string England side whose fly-half, George Ford, missed 14 points due to kicking like he had Toblerone boots on.

This is a Wales team that has won three Grand Slams in ten years, the last of which came in 2012, so what exactly is the problem?

Many might conclude the blame must be laid at the door of the head coach, Warren Gatland, something that would have been tantamount to heresy just a few years ago. But the fact remains that since 2013, Wales have been going backwards, or if not going backwards then certainly standing still while others move forwards. This despite the fact that they have virtually the same squad, containing the likes of Warburton, Jamie Roberts, Alun-Wyn Jones, George North, Leigh Halfpenny, who are one the most talented crops of players the nation has produced.

Gatland made his name at Wasps, where along with his terrifying henchman Shaun Edwards he brought cups to the London club while defining his Warrenball style and game plan which he would later bring to Wales. This was a game built around huge amounts of running power, few mistakes, physically punishing and tireless defence, winning the tackle area, kicking well out of hand and leaving Shane Williams to the do the creative bit. It was brutal and effective – who cared if it didn’t win any awards for artistic merit?

Until recently, no one. Then Williams retired, and as the effectiveness of the plan decreased there was an equal and opposite reaction in disquiet from fans. Warrenball had never beaten Southern Hemisphere teams, but it had come close and so was given a pass as the team dominated Europe.  But it feels now that Gatland and his trademark style is a game plan out of time.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wales will not win a match on this tour, make no mistake. But there are defining moments for many coaches when they realise that what has worked thus far is no longer doing the job. Great coaches seize these moments and use them to define their legacy by demonstrating they have both the ability and the bravery to significantly change their approach. Gatland could and should seize this tour as the time when he finally accepts that his previous success means nothing in a changing rugby world and implements a tangibly different approach for his players. Let them offload (it is currently not only discouraged by coaches but not allowed at all), allow Liam Williams to use his gifts from fullback, give George North an opportunity to get into the game more and for Christ’s sake let Jamie Roberts pass the bloody ball.

It won’t change the ultimate results for his team this summer but it will show that Gatland is prepared to change. To perhaps be remembered not just a very good coach who ultimately couldn’t adapt, but perhaps as one of the greats. A man who led his team fully into a new era where they had the gameplan to consistently challenge and beat the very best.

The last thing Wales fans want is to lose with the same problems present that have been highlighted repeatedly for three years. Losing they can handle, depressing repetition they cannot. New Zealand fans will probably also enjoy beating a team that attempts to play some rugby rather than one that spends 80 minutes doing an impression of 15 large men headbutting a boulder in the hope that it will cleave in two.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Sam T 2 hours ago
Jake White: Let me clear up some things

I remember towards the end of the original broadcasting deal for Super rugby with Newscorp that there was talk about the competition expanding to improve negotiations for more money - more content, more cash. Professional rugby was still in its infancy then and I held an opposing view that if Super rugby was a truly valuable competition then it should attract more broadcasters to bid for the rights, thereby increasing the value without needing to add more teams and games. Unfortunately since the game turned professional, the tension between club, talent and country has only grown further. I would argue we’re already at a point in time where the present is the future. The only international competitions that matter are 6N, RC and RWC. The inter-hemisphere tours are only developmental for those competitions. The games that increasingly matter more to fans, sponsors and broadcasters are between the clubs. Particularly for European fans, there are multiple competitions to follow your teams fortunes every week. SA is not Europe but competes in a single continental competition, so the travel component will always be an impediment. It was worse in the bloated days of Super rugby when teams traversed between four continents - Africa, America, Asia and Australia. The percentage of players who represent their country is less than 5% of the professional player base, so the sense of sacrifice isn’t as strong a motivation for the rest who are more focused on playing professional rugby and earning as much from their body as they can. Rugby like cricket created the conundrum it’s constantly fighting a losing battle with.

3 Go to comments
E
Ed the Duck 9 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Taine Plumtree: 'I couldn't blame them for saying 'Who the hell is this guy?' Taine Plumtree: 'I couldn't blame them for saying 'Who the hell is this guy?'
Search