Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Newcastle DoR Steve Diamond cops ban over 'wholly unacceptable' comments

Falcons director of Rugby Steve Diamond looks on before the Gallagher Premiership Rugby match between Newcastle Falcons and Leicester Tigers at Kingston Park on March 29, 2024 in Newcastle upon Tyne, England. (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images) (Photo by Stu Forster/Getty Images)

Newcastle Falcons’ Director of Rugby Steve Diamond has been handed a six-match ban by the RFU following his side’s controversial defeat to bottom-of-the-table rivals Exeter Chiefs at Sandy Park in March.

ADVERTISEMENT

Diamond admitted directing verbal abuse at match officials following the Falcons’ 17–15 loss, when he felt Greg Fisilau’s try should have been disallowed due to an illegal clear-out by Tamati Tua several phases earlier.

He landed himself in hot water with the authorities but admitted the offence when he appeared before the panel chaired by Sam Hillas KC, sitting with panel members Becky Essex and Martyn Wood.

Video Spacer

Will Felix Jones be the next Bok Head Coach? | RPTV

The Boks Office boy speculate as to whether Felix Jones’ return could set him up for a long term future with the Springboks. Watch the full show now on RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

Video Spacer

Will Felix Jones be the next Bok Head Coach? | RPTV

The Boks Office boy speculate as to whether Felix Jones’ return could set him up for a long term future with the Springboks. Watch the full show now on RugbyPass TV.

“There was a clear act of foul play in the buildup to the try. I don’t know for the life of me why the TMO doesn’t have a look at it at least. I didn’t see it live … but on the first replay I’ve seen, it’s ridiculous.

“Callum Chick asked the ref to check it, but nothing. If we are going to take foul play out of the game then let’s not waste time and just look at forward passes to see whether a try is a try. I am disappointed th the officials,” he said.

The panel were highly critical of Diamond in their summation of the case.

“Mr Diamond accepted that his conduct was prejudicial to the interests of the game. The two issues for the Panel were, firstly, whether the words used towards the TMO amounted to disrespect or verbal abuse of a match official.”

“And secondly, whether the circumstances of what happened after the match gave rise to two separate charges. The Panel determined that Mr Diamond’s course of conduct should be dealt with as one charge of verbal abuse.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Mr Diamond’s behaviour on 29 March was wholly unacceptable: the language used was inappropriate, abusive and entirely contrary to rugby’s core values.

“There is no place for abuse of match officials, and this applies with equal force whether dealing with the professional or community game.

“Mr Diamond has, quite rightly, apologised to the match officials for his conduct on the day, and the panel has made it clear that this kind of behaviour will not be tolerated and should not be repeated.

“This offence was charged as a breach of RFU Rule 5.12 and, as such, the panel was not bound by the sanctions table. The panel had regard to the entry points for breaches of Law 9.28 (match official abuse) as well as the relevant mitigating and aggravating features and determined a ban of six weeks was proportionate in all the circumstances,” said Hillas in a statement the RFU released on Friday evening.

ADVERTISEMENT


To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

4 Comments
J
JM 87 days ago

It’s a total joke that Steve Diamond ( straight talking ) has to have a KC to represent him . He knows when he cools down , he probably got over excited . All this legalese about bringing the game into disrepute, give me a break , please tell the lawyers to jump on another gravy train . Let rugby keep its money , it’s going to need it !

D
DJ 87 days ago

But in my opinion the officials on the day were in the wrong & Steve Diamond’s comments had foundation but as per usual the RFU want to do things behind closed doors, sweep any bad stuff under the carpet, punish the ‘whistle blower’/victim.


I get frustrated that TMOs have so much influence on the game when they are far less qualified than the Ref. A lot of technology but still no cigar. The TMO ‘might’ be able to be an AR but no where near the standard or experience to replace the Referee on the day & then there are the even less qualified assistants advising the TMO.

I
IkeaBoy 88 days ago

Diamond Steve not a diamond guy.


Rascal.

b
bit of a flanker 88 days ago

But no mention that the RFU later agreed that an offence had been committed…rugby an absolute joke at the minute. Really feel for the falcons there

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

t
takata 2 hours ago
Can Les Bleus avoid a Black-wash in New Zealand?

Sure a break is better than no break at all - but to use the same analogy as before, it’s like refilling a car with gas but not giving it a good service.

But, here, I’m just answering what it’s so hard for you to see, as you wrote above: “Overall, it is very hard to see what France is gaining in the player welfare equation. It is simply replacing one set of overworked players with another.”


And for me, the gain in the player welfare equation is certainly obvious and I wonder how you could have missed it. Or maybe you’re more a Polemist than a real Analyst?


The third Test is 19 July, round one of Top 14 2025-26 first weekend of September. Probably a month of pre-season in August with three warm-up games. Where is the off-season for players to recover properly?


In the NFL they have 7 months.

Yeah right!

The NFL is also distributing contracts worth $210.000.000+ for 4 years… In Top 14, Dupont was paid a yearly €480.000 (brut) by Toulouse while F. Russell was offered £1.000.000 with Bath. Consequently, I really fail to see how anything NFL is relevant with rugby, but you already know that.


Beside, La Section Paloise already started its pre-season (today) and the number of warm-up games would range from 0 - 2 (mostly 1). For the bulk, after five weeks, the restart is next week as their last game was on 7 June. The break is shorter than 6 weeks for their staff and those players who were not involved in their last game.


Last season ranking. Club -> date restart (break weeks)

08. Pau (SP) -> 9 July (~ 4w)

00. Montauban (USM Sapiac) -> 14 July (> Pro D2)

07. La Rochelle (SR) -> 14 July (~ 5w)

12. Paris (SF) -> 15 July (~ 5w)

11. Lyon (LOU) -> 15 July (~ 5w)

10. Racing 92 -> 15 July (~ 5w)

13. Perpignan (USAP) -> 16 July (~ 5w)

09. Montpellier (MHR) -> 16 July (~ 5w)

06. Clermont (ASM) -> 21 July (~ 5w)

05. Castres (CO) -> 21 July (~ 5w)

04. Bayonne (AB) -> 28 July (~ 5w)

03. Toulon (RCT) -> 28 July (~ 5w)

02. Bordeaux (UBB) -> 6 August (~ 5w)

01. Toulouse (ST) -> 4-11 August (~ 5-6w)


If Attissogbe (from Pau) is also playing the 19 July test (very doubtful), he will be back from holliday on 1 September (6 weeks later). No matter what, he is going to miss several rounds of Top 14.


(…) three-Test series in NZ is not ‘friendly’. It is a serious opportunity to prove you can beat one of the best nations in history in their own backyard.

You can also repeat it a million time but it won’t change the fact that those summer tests are the lowest priority on the FFR agenda. It’s a shame, it’s not going to change - even if they rename the window something else, but it’s for good reasons in my humble opinion.

165 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ All Blacks front five power points to brighter times ahead All Blacks front five power points to brighter times ahead
Search