Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

More continuity in Canberra as Brumbies lock down coaching group

Laurie Fisher during his tenure with Gloucester. Photo by Harry Trump/Getty Images

Following on the announcement of an extension to the contract of Head Coach Dan McKellar, the Brumbies have announced the extension of deals for both Assistant Coaches, Laurie Fisher and Peter Hewat.

ADVERTISEMENT

Both assistants have been extended to the end of 2021 Super Rugby season with Hewat offered a two-year extension to his current deal and Fisher twelve months to his contract.

“With Dan signing on to the end of 2021 last week, we are extremely happy to announce that both Peter Hewat and Laurie Fisher have followed suit this week,” Brumbies CEO Phil Thomson commented.

“We have in place our coaching team for the next three seasons of Super Rugby and that will help us with our continuity and planning as we look to build a strong and successful program here in Canberra.

“Both coaches have the complete trust of the playing group, Dan, myself and the board and have a wealth of knowledge and experience in rugby. We are confident that with Laurie and Peter working closely with Dan that we have the right people in place to challenge for a Super Rugby title.”

Former Brumbies, Munster and Gloucester Rugby Head Coach Laurie Fisher, or Lord as he is known to the Brumbies rugby family, returned for a second season as Assistant Coach to McKellar this season, with the remit of looking after the club’s forwards.

Assistant Coach Peter Hewat was at the forefront of the Brumbies fast-paced attacking game-plan that bore fruit at the tail-end of the 2018 Super Rugby season as the team finished the year in fine form.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Lord and Pete are two quality coaches and two quality individuals who I enjoy working with,” Brumbies Head Coach Dan McKellar said of Fisher and Hewat.

“As a coaching group and we are certainly very aligned with our thinking on the game. Like any coaching group we have individual thoughts or ideas and there are times where we challenge each other, but it’s always done with respect. For me that is a big reason of why we work well together.

“It’s nice to be able to trust your assistant coaches and give them the freedom to do their job well, which allows me to focus on what I need to focus on and as Head Coach there’s plenty to do both on and off field. When I got this opportunity, I felt it was important to surround myself with quality assistant coaches, and I am fortunate to have that.”

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

17 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Alex Mitchell: Saints 'are in a very good place at the moment' Alex Mitchell: Saints 'are in a very good place at the moment'
Search