Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Mark Cueto doubles down on history-changing 'no-try' decision

By Online Editors
(Photo by Jamie McDonald/Getty Images)

In 2007, England came within an inch of becoming the first nation to win back-to-back World Cup championships.

ADVERTISEMENT

With England sitting six points adrift of South Africa and 20 minutes left on the clock, wing Mark Cueto looked to have scored a try which would have given England a chance at taking the lead and suffocating the Springboks out of the match.

After over two minutes of deliberations, the TMO ruled that Cueto’s foot had grazed the sideline in the tackle of Danie Rossouw.

Video Spacer

Wasps’ Billy Searle took on Ulster’s Billy Burns in the Quarter-finals of the RugbyPass FIFA Pros competition.

Video Spacer

Wasps’ Billy Searle took on Ulster’s Billy Burns in the Quarter-finals of the RugbyPass FIFA Pros competition.

South Africa went on to win the match 15-6.

Cueto’s been haunted by the non-try ever since.

“Everyone takes the mick out of me when I say I still think it was a try but I genuinely do,” said Cueto in the build-up to last year’s World Cup final between the same two nation. “There’s a million angles to suggest it was a try and there was one angle where it was 50-50.

“South Africa didn’t get in our 22, they scored all their points from penalties. You never know how it would have gone but we were confident we could have closed the game out.”

With all rugby at a standstill in 2020 due to the coronavirus pandemic, Cueto likely hasn’t lacked for time to reflect – and he’s now doubled down on his call that the wrong decision was made 13 years ago.

South Africa Rugby magazine tweeted earlier this week that journalist Jon Cardinelli’s favourite World Cup moment was Rossouw’s tackle – and Cueto was quick to respond.

ADVERTISEMENT

While Cueto may be sticking to his guns on that matter, he may well be wishing he hadn’t spoken up prior to last year’s final.

“I see it as a positive,” Cueto said. “It’s my fifth year since I retired and you soon get forgotten so it’s quite a nice thing to be remembered. Obviously I’d rather be remembered for something a bit more positive.

“Certainly this week I knew it was going to be mentioned more than ever. I don’t know when it will go away, I think maybe if we go on to beat South Africa this weekend and win the World Cup then there’s almost no reason to refer back to ’07 any more. From a selfish point of view, that would be sad because then I’d be really forgotten, wouldn’t I?”

ADVERTISEMENT

South Africa, of course, triumphed 32-12, consigning the English to another loss against their Southern Hemisphere rivals. There were no moments of controversy to speak about, England were simply outplayed across the park.

It looks like Mark Cueto and his ‘try’ won’t be forgotten any time soon.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 18 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won
Search