Northern | US

Jones' questionable 'finishers' policy draws fire from England fans on Twitter

Eddie's reluctance to use his 'finishers' has not gone unnoticed
Comments
Comment

As expected after England’s chastening loss to Wales on Saturday, fans were quite critical of the performance on Twitter.

ADVERTISEMENT

After two bonus-point wins over Ireland and France in the opening two rounds, many fans would have expected the same in Cardiff, but it wasn’t to be as Wales completely nullified England’s kicking game and were able to dominate territory and possession.

England looked unable to break out of the game plan that has served them so well so far this Championship, and, in the end, they lost without troubling the Welsh at all in the closing stages.

What confused many fans was Eddie Jones’ reluctance to look to his bench to change things up in the latter stages of the match. In Jones’ entire tenure in England, he has never given his bench fewer minutes.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

Most notably was the fact that neither Dan Robson nor George Ford were used by Jones. This was a game where a new half backs seemed to be a necessity, as England’s incessant kicking game was not working. Ford offers a greater attacking threat and is a better creator than Farrell, while the same could equally be said about Robson and Youngs.

The fact that Jones did not turn to them when they were dearly needed shows how little trust the Australian has in them, and that is apparent to the fans.

https://twitter.com/thelongestone/status/1099350484190674946
https://twitter.com/Joatamos/status/1099602947435085824
https://twitter.com/powellsw/status/1099379135032500224
https://twitter.com/tevansJJ/status/1099373616901357570

ADVERTISEMENT

Saturday’s match once again unearthed a perennial topic of debate which is the inclusion of Danny Cipriani. The game was crying out for someone to inject some attacking impetus into the England team and keep the ball in hand.

Farrell was not having the greatest day in an England shirt, and needed to come off or revert to inside centre, as players like Manu Tuilagi outside him were becoming nothing other than spectators in attack.

While Ford could be that man, the fact that Jones did not trust him opened up calls for the Gloucester fly-half to come back into the team. Cipriani has been on the periphery of the England squad for a long time, and while he has been given chances, he has not been able to curry favour with Jones.

However, some fans believe Cipriani had the credentials to change England’s non-existent attack on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

This is what they had to say:

https://twitter.com/taviraterry/status/1099603811059056642
https://twitter.com/RogerGadd/status/1099381301658963968
https://twitter.com/SmilerScottUK/status/1099415674345213952
https://twitter.com/ColemanG1992/status/1099383403697324032

Stream Nations Championship 2026 LIVE

Hemispheres collide in the new Nations Championship. Stream live, replays and highlights free on RugbyPass TV.

Watch on RPTV
Starts 4th July 2026 - USA only.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 33 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Copied to clipboard

Share Article close