Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Jacques Burger shared a breathtakingly brutal hit from a SA schoolboy match and not everyone's happy

By Ian Cameron
Jacques Burger at the Rugby World Cup in 2015

The sharing of an eye-watering hit from a South African schoolboy match by former Saracens backrow Jacques Burger has ignited a heated debate around concussion and player welfare on Twitter.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Namibian international Burger – a player known for his own bone-jarring hits – tweeted a video of a brutal tackle from a Monument Boys versus Paarl Boys match in South Africa.

The short, soundless video features one of the most brutal schoolboy rugby tackles ever caught on camera and has been viewed over 54,000 times.

The tackle in question – a legal one – left the recipient apparently unconscious and while many responded with awe at the ferocity of the collision, others within Twitter’s rugby community questioned the glorification of a tackle that left a young player apparently suffering a head trauma.

One poster remarked: ‘As much as I like a good hard tackle, that was not pleasant at all… hope the lad is okay’

https://twitter.com/Reallaunchpad/status/1109384514579640320

Another posted: ‘all that is wrong with rugby today, a sickening hit – promoted as “boom”.

Sam Peters, the UK journalist and concussion awareness advocate also took issue with the video, questioning if rugby as a sport should be taking pleasure in such incidents:

ADVERTISEMENT

“Huge question for rugby and @Nabasboer do we celebrate seeing a child smashed head first into rock hard ground or search for ways to avoid? For what it’s worth, watching this makes me physically sick.”

https://twitter.com/Sam_sportsnews/status/1109462334345486337

Burger responded in kind, saying: ‘We should give our youngsters all the tools to be safe in rugby but we should never teach our kids to do things halfheartedly.’

The hit does pose a question for which the sport is struggling to find an answer for: How can a game simultaneously value both physical confrontation and player welfare without compromising on one or the other?

ADVERTISEMENT

In a week in which World Rugby announced it is to explore potential rule changes to improve player safety and reduce the risk of injuries, the debate on this video is a salient one and one that needs to be had.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 13 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Chasing the American dream Chasing the American dream
Search