Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'I've seen it all now' - Rieko Ioane weighs in schoolboy rugby debate

New Zealand's Rieko Ioane. Photo / Anthony Au-Yeung/Getty Images

All Blacks wing Rieko Ioane has weighed in on the seemingly Auckland-wide boycott of St Kentigern College’s first XV by 10 competing schools.

Former Auckland Grammar School star Ioane chimed in on Instagram, preaching the idea that teams should want to test themselves against the best.

“I’ve seen it all now. Just because they recruit doesn’t mean you pull [the] plug. Don’t run from the competition,” he shared on his Instagram story.

“If you wanna be the best you beat the best.

“St Kents makes first XV competition harder but it makes it better when you beat them.”

The debate comes after the New Zealand Herald revealed yesterday that St Kentigern College will reportedly be boycotted by rival schools fed up by the school’s recruitment policies. Up to five players from rival schools were recruited to play for St Kentigern next year.

‘They’re not building from the ground up, from year nine to 11. They’re going after the superstars and it’s brazen,” Napier Boys principal Matthew Bertram told the Herald, after their halfback joined the school for next year.

After attempts to formalise some standard guidelines failed, including limiting teams to playing just two regional players who have played 1st XV rugby before, up to 10 schools formally advised St Kentigerns they would boycott playing them.

ADVERTISEMENT
All Blacks wing Rieko Ioane during his time with Auckland Grammar School. Photo / Getty Images

“It’s a serious issue and it needed a serious response,” Mount Albert Grammar School principal Patrick Drumm said.

“We needed to take a strong leadership stand as a recruitment strategy like this is not what school sport should be about.

“The integrity and credibility of the competition is challenged by targeting elite players from around the country.

“We felt the time was right to try to have a moral and ethical discussion and while we had a positive meeting with King’s that wasn’t the case with St Kents.”

“It is the immediate decision of each of our schools that in 2019 our 1st XV rugby teams will not now compete against St Kentigern College.”

Local college sports bylaws restrict inter-school recruitment within the Auckland region, however, St Kentigern’s recruitment net has spread to a national stage in recent years.

Rugby World Cup City Guides – Oita:

Video Spacer

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 5 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

16 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search