Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'If they lose against Scotland, I'm okay with that': Muliaina on All Blacks' Northern Tour priorities

By Ned Lester
Stephen Perofeta, Leicester Fai'anganuku and Jordie Barrett at All Blacks training. Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images

Ex-All Black Mils Muliaina has revealed how he would manage the All Blacks‘ playing time over the Northern Tour, which includes fielding the strongest possible team against Japan but not against Scotland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Muliaina was debating the best way to execute New Zealand’s Northern Tour with former All Black Jeff Wilson and Black Fern Chelsea Semple on The Breakdown when his claim to be unbothered by the All Blacks potentially losing to Scotland for the first time in history was met with disbelief.

The major discussion point was finding the balance between exposing young players to test-level rugby before next year’s World Cup and building momentum and confidence within the first-choice XV.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

“This isn’t a Rugby World cup practice run,” Muiliaina stated. “What we’ve got to get out of it is, there’s two things; get momentum, which is what we want, we want to be winning games. But, also introduce guys.

“So when do we introduce guys? I don’t think it’s the first game against Japan, because of the layoff that the guys have had.

“I think it’s the Scottish test.”

Scotland finished fourth in this year’s Six Nations after beating England to retain the Calcutta Cup in round one, then defeating Italy in round 5. The Scotts then lost their three-game series against Argentina in July.

In Japan’s four matches this year, they have beaten Uruguay twice but also lost twice to France.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I think you go in there (to Japan) and you say ‘well let’s put our best team available.’

“Perofeta probably gets in there because you know, Barrett’s out. It’s a great way to introduce someone into that.

“You lead into the Welsh test and you’re humming.”

Ian Foster will be forced to make some changes for the Japan test regardless of his initial plans, due to a number of players being ruled unavailable through injury and bereavement leave.

Related

“Ok, the Scottish test you might want to say ‘well Roger Tuivasa-Sheck, do we bring him off the bench? Do we introduce another couple of other guys?’

ADVERTISEMENT

“Because then there’s a short turnaround before… I think that England game has got to be the one that they win.

“Japan, let’s get a lead on after a five-week break, then you go into Wales and you’re really humming, maybe pull a few guys out and test a few guys against Scotland, if they lose in Scotland, mate, I’m ok with that.

This statement caused Jeff Wilson to interject “stop it, you are not ok with us losing to Scotland!”

“I will be ok with that, if they come away with the English test and they’re really humming, I think they’ll go into 2024 really confident.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 5 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain? Who will be Robertson's choice as All Blacks captain?
Search