Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'I will take responsibility for my personal errors... I dropped a few balls'

By PA
(Photo by Ross Parker/SNS Group via Getty Images)

Edinburgh forward Nick Haining admitted his side’s error-strewn display against Ospreys was unacceptable.

ADVERTISEMENT

Richard Cockerill’s men led early on from a penalty try after a good break down the left but Grant Gilchrist soon followed visiting skipper Justin Tipuric into the sin bin and Ospreys went on to win 25-10.

Edinburgh spilled high balls in the torrential rain, Jaco Van Der Walt missed two first-half penalties and the home side failed to make any inroads whatsoever into the Welsh outfit’s 22 during a second half in which they failed to score any points.

Video Spacer

James Hook on All Access

Video Spacer

James Hook on All Access

It was a fourth consecutive defeat and Haining insists they were not moping over their disappointing finale to last season when they threw away a semi-final lead over Ulster and then lost in Europe to Bordeaux.

“We can’t make those excuses,” the number eight said. “We are into a new season now, we had the week off, and we put that behind us. We should be hitting the ground running.

“To lose like that, with that many errors, wasn’t good enough. We won’t make any excuses.

“It would have been nice to have a bigger break but it’s the way it is, everybody is in the same boat.

“We had a good pre-season, we had our finals, we had a week off, and there’s no excuses really, we should have been better.

ADVERTISEMENT

“I will take responsibility for my personal errors. We have made errors in the game that cost us.

“Me personally, I dropped a few balls, we were under pressure in our own half and not exiting.

“We made that many errors, it’s hard to get a foothold in the game. We talked about it after the game and that’s where we let ourselves down.”

Cockerill was already missing several key players such as Jamie Ritchie and Duhan Van Der Merwe and his plans were further disrupted by early injuries to Luke Crosbie (hamstring) and Magnus Bradbury (head).

“It does not help that two of the back-row guys go off early,” Cockerill said.

ADVERTISEMENT

“The weather conditions were difficult and they controlled them much better than we did.

“We were a bit naive and did not exit out of our own half and put ourselves under pressure.

“There were a couple of missed touches, missed penalties and other parts of it. They controlled the game better. We were not very composed.

“Once they got the lead they stuck the ball at the right end of the field and made us play. We did not have the nous to put them under pressure.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

F
Flankly 18 hours ago
The AI advantage: How the next two Rugby World Cups will be won

If rugby wants to remain interesting in the AI era then it will need to work on changing the rules. AI will reduce the tactical advantage of smart game plans, will neutralize primary attacking weapons, and will move rugby from a being a game of inches to a game of millimetres. It will be about sheer athleticism and technique,about avoiding mistakes, and about referees. Many fans will find that boring. The answer is to add creative degrees of freedom to the game. The 50-22 is an example. But we can have fun inventing others, like the right to add more players for X minutes per game, or the equivalent of the 2-point conversion in American football, the ability to call a 12-player scrum, etc. Not saying these are great ideas, but making the point that the more of these alternatives you allow, the less AI will be able to lock down high-probability strategies. This is not because AI does not have the compute power, but because it has more choices and has less data, or less-specific data. That will take time and debate, but big, positive and immediate impact could be in the area of ref/TMO assistance. The technology is easily good enough today to detect forward passes, not-straight lineouts, offside at breakdown/scrum/lineout, obstruction, early/late tackles, and a lot of other things. WR should be ultra aggressive in doing this, as it will really help in an area in which the game is really struggling. In the long run there needs to be substantial creativity applied to the rules. Without that AI (along with all of the pro innovations) will turn rugby into a bash fest.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year Seb Blake: From Chinnor to the European champions in one crazy year
Search