Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'I just said to someone after the game that 57, 27, 37 does not bother me'

By Online Editors
(Photo by Michael Steele/Getty Images)

Head coach Ali Hepher insists Exeter will ‘stay hungry’ to secure the Gallagher Premiership title this season.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Chiefs overwhelmed Northampton with an astonishing 54 points in 48 minutes to win 57-7.

It was all the more incredible as Northampton came to Sandy Park knowing that a win would put them top of the table.

But tries from Jonny Hill, Elvis Taione, Jannes Kirsten, Tom Hendrickson (2), Ben Moon, Tom O’Flaherty and Sam Simmonds, along with a penalty and five conversions from fly-half Joe Simmonds and two conversions by his replacement Gareth Steenson, sent the Saints crashing.

Northampton’s only consolation was they were not whitewashed as fly-half James Grayson crossed for a second-half try that he converted himself.

Continue reading below…

WATCH: Blues coach Leon McDonald and captain Patrick Tuipulotu after win over Bulls at Loftus Versfeld

Video Spacer

It puts Exeter eight points clear of second-placed Sale Sharks, and the journey continues next week with a trip to Harlequins, who lost to Bath on Saturday.

ADVERTISEMENT

Hepher said: “That is a massive game. They will be hungry after yesterday and we have got to make sure we are in the right frame of mind.

“There is another four or five points up for grabs and we have to have an appetite to go after them.

“That is the secret for us going forward. We have to make sure we stay hungry.”

Hepher explained: “We don’t want to take our foot off the pedal.

“There is plenty to improve on from today and we will do that on Tuesday morning and get on with it.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The first half-hour was turgid with one Simmonds penalty dividing the teams and Hepher added: “We were disappointed with the early part of the game. They are a good side and are high in the league for a reason.

“We were a bit slow in the way we played the game. We wanted to up the tempo and speed of the game.

“Equally, there was a lot of good stuff in the second half and the guys fought relentlessly for the points.”

Northampton director of rugby Chris Boyd was philosophical after the hammering, saying: “I just said to someone after the game that 57, 27, 37 does not bother me.

“We chased the game at the end and coughed up some soft tries.

“We got to 34 minutes and it was 8-0 and the plan was to try and get through the first 40 minutes with minimal damage and see if we could bring some fresh guys on at half-time, which was a pre-planned move.

“Between 34 minutes and 40 minutes, eight became 22 and then we chased the game.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 3 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Luke Cowan-Dickie: 'I didn’t feel right. I felt like I was going to pass out. Everything was going black in front of me' Luke Cowan-Dickie: 'I didn’t feel right. I felt like I was going to pass out. Everything was going black in front of me'
Search