Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Hamilton Boys' HS have the strongest case as the world's best rugby school

(Photo by Peter Meecham/Getty Images)

Hamilton Boys’ High School has claimed the 2023 Sanix World Rugby Youth title with a 28-22 victory over Higashi Fukuoaka High School, consolidating their credentials as the best rugby school worldwide.

ADVERTISEMENT

With four triumphs, the most of any school at the tournament, Hamilton Boys have previously won the title in 2010, 2011, and 2014, two more than the next-best school, Paul Roos Gymnasium of South Africa, with two titles.

If one were to determine the world’s top school, the most reasonable approach would be to examine the trophies.

Hamilton Boys possesses more global silverware than any other 1st XV programme on the planet.

The Sanix World Rugby Youth 1st XV tournament, which has been in existence since the year 2000, has always been the long-standing pinnacle for New Zealand.

New Zealand schools can only participate in the Japan-based event by winning the national 1st XV title, which is a remarkable achievement in and of itself.

The country’s national champions advance to the Sanix tournament the following year, which often means that school leavers are absent and the squad is not as potent as it was.

Nonetheless, it guarantees that only those who earn the opportunity can participate.

The qualification system has paid off, with New Zealand schools winning 10 Sanix titles in total, more than any other nation, followed by South Africa with six, Australia with two, France with two, and Fiji with one.

ADVERTISEMENT

The World Schools festival, a South African-born tournament that launched in 2018 that was held in Thailand last year, has only just begun to attract the best participants.

The first edition in 2018 held at Paarl Boys High saw Napier Boys HS and Christchurch Boys HS participate, while New Zealand’s 2017 national champions, Hastings Boys HS, went to Sanix instead.

Christchurch Boys HS were invited to the inaugural event only after spoiling Paarl Boys’ tour of New Zealand in 2017.

The South African school had beaten a handful of reputable schools on their pre-season tour, before being defeated 38-36 in a classic encounter by Chirstchurch Boys HS which ended a 43-game unbeaten streak for Paarl.

ADVERTISEMENT

Despite beating Paarl, that year Christchurch were Canterbury champions but failed to make it out of the South Island final.

The 2022 World Schools Festival held in Thailand saw a number of strong rugby schools attend adding credibility to the title, which was ultimately claimed by Hamilton Boys.

This is the first time that a school has taken both World titles, ratifying the two events.

Hamilton Boys soundly beat a Grey College outfit which was said to be missing school leavers, which is unfortunately part and parcel of schoolboy rugby.

The school’s best 1st XV team is the team available on that particular day. If they wear the crest, they are expected to represent the school to the best of their ability.

There will never be perfect alignment that will find the two strongest schools at the perfect time.

Differing school year calendars across the Hemispheres, the prohibitive cost of sending schoolboys around the world, makes it a difficult task.

But there is no doubt that Hamilton Boys is the strongest programme in New Zealand and they now have the strongest case as the world’s best.

They aren’t the best every year, but no school has claimed as many national titles and as many world titles.

The ultimate test for Hamilton Boys would be a tour of South Africa to face the likes of Grey, Paarl Boys, Paarl Gym, Affies.

If one of the South African schools can make it out to New Zealand again, they must find a way to face a mix of Super 8 and Auckland 1A schools who are generally the strongest in the country.

But if schools can pull together the funding to make 1st XV fixtures happen, surely the national unions can.

A bi-annual representative fixture between the New Zealand schoolboys reps and the South African schoolboys, which has never occurred, would be a must-watch spectacle.

The travel commitment would only occur once every four years by alternating between host countries every two years, and a tour could feature warm-up games against provincial U18 rep sides before the schoolboy Test.

It would be the most anticipated schoolboy rugby fixture in the world.

The Australian schoolboys, who already play the New Zealand schools on an annual basis, could also be invited to make up a Tri-Nations series.

South African rugby likes to view itself as the brotherly rivals of New Zealand rugby.

That is simply not true. Outside of the All Blacks and Springboks clashes, what is there?

The two countries do not have strong enough ties at all levels of the game, especially after the Super Rugby teams bailed for Europe.

A representative schoolboy fixture between the countries would be cherished on both sides and settle the debate every two years.

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
P
Pongo7 598 days ago

Why should HBHS travel to SA? SA should travel to NZ

J
Jmann 623 days ago

'Biannual' means twice in a year. The author is searching for the word 'Biennial' (once every 2 years).

Hamilton Boys have an excellent case as the world's best rugby school. But that Sannix event favours the Japanese teams with a soft draw for home teams and exceptionally, extremely poor officiating from the local refs.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 58 minutes ago
Scott Robertson has to take charge of his All Blacks in 2025

Haha crap man I wouldn't know if SR has ever made a profit. ABs subsidize everything. Factors like SR clubs not paying 'for' their ABs etc, normal having a star would cost you 2 or 3x as much as a regular, but NZR covers all that in NZ. Pretty sure was the case for the other two partners too. I doubt even NZR knows the exact ratios sponsors like Sky/Adidas/AIG/Altrad/Investec give for local product.


No doubt SR used to make more money with the 3 partners, but of course it was also split 3 way. TBH I don't think its going to be much different (I think the new deal is still higher than before?). That last deal was bumper despite the comp being in decline, then SA left and the deal was probably worth even more for NZ? Can't recall how that played out I think Sky kept the agreemnt (fully). They'll be taking a big hit but it would be anything to do with the state of the game.


So when you say bleeding, you mean since around 2013/14 right? When SA'n and Aussie crowds finally stopped turning up to watch NZ smash them every week. So again, I was just stating your picture was wrong, and you've got the wrong causes, I don't disagree too much with the idea it's 'bleeding' though, id1ots were complaining about NZ sides getting a rough deal come final time for a loooong period and lots of other things that dragged the game down but on the field it just kept getting better and better. The problem is this nationalistic concept, that caught up on them (previously being the great driver for interest) and fans didn't care about the top four teams like every other sports competition in the world. They only cared about their local teams not winning.


No, SR wasnt optimal, which is what it was recommended to have just the SR Pacific comp instead. I'm not sure how much better things are now though. It needs time?


I know how I'd like to find equilibrium and it's much like what you propose. One big difference is I just don't think they need to cut SR. I would switch investment into an NPC/fully domestic scene + youth, like you, I'd just have like a much shorter SR season and I'd try and create a university scene rather than high school, that little extra age demographic matters a lot to investment/interest.


It's what the NRL can pay, and I think I heard it recently for someone in the spot light. I used it as a future figure more than anything though, the idea being these other leagues are only going to be more and more competitive, so much so they take away local talent before it can have a chance to develop. And once it goes they're unlikely to develop into the player they would have here. Not choosing a path that can compete will be a disaster imo. Thus the All Black decline.


I think don't think theres any reason your ideas can't work though, with maybe a added little flair here and there to drive some extra revenue. 20 is just a number to get a picture how many of top 60 might dissapear, it's nothing Id calculated. Think of it as an 'at any particular time' number.


In general I think people so quickly forget those that leave and all hope is placed on the next guy. Think that were talking top 4 or 5 in a position, there are a lot of positions that don't place much past the number 3. Look at Bell, theres no one he would be one of NZ top dozen hookers, numerous people would have left without getting a shot and the likes of Riccitelli or Eklund are obvious better. You've got first fives like Burke, Jordan, Falcon, Black, Plummer next year, Ioane Sopoaga, West who at any one time are going to be 3, 4, and 5 in NZ order. You've TKB, Smith, now Perenara, Weber, even Ruru is having a standout season and ALL would be better than the 3rd best local in Hotham or Christie. Now weve got last season statistical best full back leaving in Stevenson, he's joining Moorby and Rayasi, Bridge, and god knows who else who's having an awesome year that would break him into the All Blacks if it was in Super Rugby. Midfield is stacked when at home would be scratching around for guys like the Umaga-Jensen boys hoping they were fit to fill out 4 or 5th best 2nd5 and centers, when the likes of TJ Faiane, Nankiville, Seta, Aso, Fekitoa, Goodhue, Leicester, Ngani, even one of my fav Rob Thompson would be better than getting down to picks like Aumua, Ennor, McCleod, Tupea, and those that would have to come after them. We've got some of my fav loosies in Lachlan Boshier, Charlie Gamble, Whetu Douglas overseas, now Akira, never my talented players like.


I think your top 60 must have be a picture of the 36 man Crusaders squad plus a list of last years All Blacks! Obviously I've gone off track here as sure, these players leave a big whole but it's not one that NZ hasn't been able to fill in the past while maintaining quality SR sides (the periods when it was rocking), but there will be a time when loosing too many of those quality players has a much bigger impact than the already currently disillusioned SR fan can take.


Bottom line is Australia have far more talent and players that we do (statistically) and all that would need to have in the short term to fix your perceived problem with Super Rugby is trade some the best NZ players into the Aus sides. Simple, problem solved, competitive comp achieved.

cut off super rugby and stop the bleeding . put all the money back into the remaining competitions

Is too quick, many will see it as an opportunity to leave and that starts the very risky slope. You have to have a plan. Any change needs to be gradual and with a better future prospect, until then, voices like yours are only going to undermine any possible immediate success.

87 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Is the overlap dying in modern rugby? Is the overlap dying in modern rugby?
Search