Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

England fans are positively revelling in the return of Manu Tuilagi

By Josh Raisey
(Getty Images)

England fans took to Twitter after England’s win over Ireland in Dublin on Saturday to show their delight at the return of Manu Tuilagi. The Leicester centre was making his first start in an England shirt since 2014, and there were many questions waiting to be answered.

ADVERTISEMENT

Fans and pundits were speculating how the 27-year-old would fare playing alongside Henry Slade in addition to the slight positional change of moving to inside centre from his usual position of outside centre for the Tigers.

Many lingering questions seemed to be answered within one of the first exchanges of the match as the powerful centre received a long lineout throw from Jamie George, and crashed into Ireland’s Josh van der Flier. This not only created the platform for England’s blistering start to the match, whereby they scored fairly soon after, but set the tone for Tuilagi’s performance.

The number 12 was an immense physical presence in both attack and defence, meaning the Irish consistently struggled to make ground. The way he charged out of the line in the second half and careered into his opposite man Bundee Aki epitomised his performance and highlighted what he can bring to Eddie Jones’ side.

Continue reading below…

Video Spacer

The partnership with Slade was also another encouraging factor for the England side, as both players bring something different to the team. Tuilagi was not excessively used by Owen Farrell, as he also served as a decoy to draw in Irish defenders and create space for the likes of Slade and Elliot Daly outside him.

Of course, his performances and ability have rarely been questioned during his absence from the national set-up, but it has been persistent injuries and off-field misdemeanours that have curtailed his progress. Many fans will be hoping that he can put those problems behind him, as Saturday was a clear indication of what the future will be like with him in the squad.

This is what the fans had to say:
https://twitter.com/Sam_sportsnews/status/1091771337939566599
https://twitter.com/daddancer1905/status/1091740624817188864
https://twitter.com/meganambxr/status/1091742782153216000
https://twitter.com/hopkins_dale/status/1091762128737001472
https://twitter.com/JacobFreeman95/status/1091766928731967494
https://twitter.com/RugbyLAD7/status/1091777551444389890
https://twitter.com/flashyGnius/status/1091764515837001730
https://twitter.com/adil_fahad/status/1091829447714574337
https://twitter.com/brakey7/status/1092167182186876928

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 2 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good an Irish side' Ex-Ireland wing brands Six Nations champs 'not that good'
Search