Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Conspiracy? Smit tweets what many were thinking during Italian game

By Josh Raisey
John Smit

Rassie Erasmus and Conor O’Shea made it clear with their selections this week that South Africa’s contest with Italy would be a battle up front. Both head coaches named six forwards on the bench to indicate that.

ADVERTISEMENT

So it was a bit of a let down that 60 minutes of the match had uncontested scrums. However, this seemed like a blessing in disguise for Italy.

It was clear from the very first scrum of the match that the Springboks had the upper hand, so much so that they concertinaed tighthead Simone Ferrari and caused him to leave the field with what looked like a hamstring injury.

It was not much easier for his replacement Marco Riccioni at scrum time before he sustained an injury to his torso after 15 minutes. Bizarrely, he went off for a head injury assessment after 20 minutes and did not return, leaving the game with uncontested scrums.

Video Spacer

This looked like it was going to be a successful part of the game for the Springboks, and some think that Italy were somewhat lucky to only face 20 minutes of the South African pack going at them full bore.

Former Springboks captain and Rugby World Cup winner John Smit said on Twitter that it was “convenient” that Italy should lose two tightheads so early in the game.

Now Smit may not be suggesting this was intentional, but everyone watching the game clearly saw that Italy benefitted from having uncontested scrums, and there are undoubtedly those who think that this may have been a ploy.

ADVERTISEMENT

Since then, people have been suggesting that props should know how to cover both sides of the scrum, which is far easier said than done as only a handful of players know how to do so. The move from loosehead to tighthead is particularly difficult, and one that would be hard to make all props do.
Other suggestions have been to have more players on the bench, who are not all allowed to be used, but are there to prevent something like this happening again. Scrums are part of rugby, and some feel that having them uncontested dilutes the game.

Something may need to be done to stop this happening again, as this could become a tactic that teams use when their scrum is under pressure.

The irony in this game was that starting loosehead Andrea Lovotti was given a red card, and replacement loosehead Nicola Quaglio, who came on for the two tightheads, should have seen red as well as they committed an atrocious clearout on Duane Vermeulen. Italy could well have finished the game with absolutely no props to play.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 1 | Will Skelton

ABBIE WARD: A BUMP IN THE ROAD

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 9

James Cook | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

New Zealand victorious in TENSE final | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Men's Highlights

New Zealand crowned BACK-TO-BACK champions | Cathay/HSBC Sevens Day Three Women's Highlights

Japan Rugby League One | Bravelupus v Steelers | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

E
Ed the Duck 6 hours ago
How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle

Hey Nick, your match analysis is decent but the top and tail not so much, a bit more random. For a start there’s a seismic difference in regenerating any club side over a test team. EJ pretty much had to urinate with the appendage he’d been given at test level whereas club success is impacted hugely by the budget. Look no further than Boudjellal’s Toulon project for a perfect example. The set ups at La Rochelle and Leinster are like chalk and cheese and you are correct that Leinster are ahead. Leinster are not just slightly ahead though, they are light years ahead on their plans, with the next gen champions cup team already blooded, seasoned and developing at speed from their time manning the fort in the URC while the cream play CC and tests. They have engineered a strong talent conveyor belt into their system, supported by private money funnelled into a couple of Leinster private schools. The really smart move from Leinster and the IRFU however is maximising the Irish Revenue tax breaks (tax relief on the best 10 years earnings refunded at retirement) to help keep all of their stars in Ireland and happy, while simultaneously funding marquee players consistently. And of course Barrett is the latest example. But in no way is he a “replacement for Henshaw”, he’s only there for one season!!! As for Rob Baxter, the best advice you can give him is to start lobbying Parliament and HMRC for a similar state subsidy, but don’t hold your breath… One thing Cullen has been very smart with is his coaching team. Very quickly he realised his need to supplement his skills, there was talk of him exiting after his first couple of years but he was extremely shrewd bringing in Lancaster and now Nienaber. That has worked superbly and added a layer that really has made a tangible difference. Apart from that you were bang on the money… 😉😂

5 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle How Leinster neutralised 'long-in-the-tooth' La Rochelle
Search