Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Brits' not so subtle dig at club who failed to sign him

Veteran hooker Schalk Brits has talked openly about the administrative blunder that saw the Stormers lose out on his services – report Rugby 365.

ADVERTISEMENT

Brits, 37, will play for the Bulls in 2019, as he hopes to secure a spot in the Springbok World Cup squad.

However, his initial choice was to have worked his way into contention through the Stormers – whom he played 50-odd games for, before a decade-long stint with Saracens in England.

Unfortunately for Brits, the bungling Stormers administration scuppered the deal he thought was on the cards.

It turned out that a lack of communication between Western Province Rugby WP Director of Rugby Gert Smal and CEO Paul Zacks resulted in offers to both Brits and Corné Fourie.

Video Spacer

Smal offered Fourie a contract and Zacks negotiated with Brits.

With just enough money for one contract, the Stormers administrators had to tell Brits his services were now surplus to requirements.

He eventually found sanctuary with the Bulls at Loftus Versfeld. Brits had a not so subtle dig at the Stormers management this week, when he fronted up to the media. He made it clear that the welcome he received in Pretoria far superseded the Newlands reception.

ADVERTISEMENT

“You know what is nice, is going to a place where you are wanted,” the veteran hooker told the media briefing.

“The Stormers have their problems and I’m happy to be here.

“I’m with a group of players that wants to succeed and with a coaching staff that wants to learn and get better.

“I am at a union that not just wants to compete but wants to win something.

“So from that point of view, if we keep on with the work ethic, discipline and with time, this team can perform to the supporter’s expectations.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Brits said he is happy to play a mentoring role at Loftus, imparting the knowledge of more than 280 first class games.

“What is nice is that we have a young bunch of players and a group of experienced heads that have been around the block a little bit that can help the younger players exponentially as quickly as they can,” he said of the Bulls squad.

“What I’ve felt in the past what has happened in SA Rugby is that you almost lose your middle-tier of players, and you’ve only got the Springboks and the young guys coming through.

“And the guys who are supposed to pass on the intellectual capital, you lost them to the overseas market.’

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 5 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

16 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.' Makazole Mapimpi: 'My life is somewhere I never thought it would be.'
Search