Northern | US

Why this semi-final is the Blues' best shot at the champs


(Photo by Fiona Goodall/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

No visiting team has won a playoff game in Christchurch, ever. 27 years of Super Rugby have provided 28 home fixtures for the Crusaders and the men in red and black have emerged victorious in each of those games. That record will again be on the line this weekend when a familiar rival ventures south for a mouth-watering semi-final.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Crusaders finished their quarter-final with just 13 men on the pitch, not due to ill-discipline, but injury. While some withdrawals were claimed to be precautionary with the game all but decided, there is concern the reigning champions will have to reach even further into the well in order to make up the numbers for their remaining playoff games.

The Blues are not without injury concerns of their own, Patrick Tuipolotu has been ruled out with a broken arm and Caleb Clarke was absent in their quarter-final with a quad issue.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

The Crusaders though are testing their depth to a different level, 11 members of their squad are unavailable to them with the potential for that number to increase once the weekend’s toll has been fully assessed. That number includes six All Blacks.

Former gold medalist with the All Black Sevens, Karl Te Nana joined Sky’s The Breakdown panel this week and agreed with former All Black Mils Muliaina that this Blues team possesses the ability to punish teams in ways last season’s side couldn’t.

“The Blues at the moment, they’re finding ways to score and they’re quite explosive,” he said. “Very different from last season. I think the Blues have got that X-factor that they can strike from anywhere.”

Related

While Beauden Barrett faced criticism over his from early in the season, the backline for the Blues has developed chemistry throughout the season and no one can deny the threat that right winger Mark Telea poses, having scored 12 tries this season – equalling a Blues record.

ADVERTISEMENT

Adding to the challenge for the Crusaders will be the Blues’ new kicking tactics, which include the long-range boot of Zarn Sullivan. The expected Christchurch conditions could well make for a kick-heavy night and while the Crusaders are used to getting the upper hand in the kicking duels, they’ll be without one of their top options.

“It was minus two (degrees) when we left this morning,” Jeff Wilson told The Breakdown panel. “It’s going to be the same (on Friday).

“It’s going to be more and more difficult to play any of that expansive rugby and shifting the ball. They’re going to need to have their kicking game on point and that’s the big challenge I see for Will Jordan playing fullback for the Crusaders because Zarn Sullivan is going to do that for the Blues.

“With no David Havili to help with that load, I think that will be significant in this matchup.”

ADVERTISEMENT

The Crusaders lept into the lead in their quarter-final matchup with the Fijian Drua, scoring twice in the opening five minutes. Coming out of the gates strong has been a feature of the team’s winning run and Wilson expects the opening minutes to have a strong influence on the outcome of the match come Friday.

“The critical part for me will be the first 20 minutes of this game, if you step up, you stand up and you make a statement early that there’s nowhere you can dominate us, then the Blues will go a long way to winning it.”

Watch Super Rugby LIVE on RugbyPass TV

Tune in to every Super Rugby Pacific 2026 match live and on-demand on RugbyPass TV and via the RugbyPass app.

Watch Live
Streaming available in the USA only.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cnw 4 hours ago
France has conquered and reconquered Europe. Can it reach its Mount Everest?

It’s mind boggling that the best are not playing the best in July! Though the commercial reality bites here. On the B/C/D I think the issue is one of communicating ideas. You point out that in reality the majority of the players were third or fourth choice or perhaps worse. And the way you explained it as someone who clearly knows the French comp that makes sense. So I accept that it was perhaps a third or fourth choice team overall. I should be clear though I think that the quality of the team exceeded the sum of its parts. And I think a D grade is way too low. Their performance was too good to get such a grade. And I think that reflects that they are very good players who had a good chance to build combinations. Would the first choice players have played better - very likely. But that does not diminish the performance of the boys that played.

Put another way, I understand that the French team that played the Boks had a good number of first choice players in stark contrast to the teams that played in NZ. But they did not perform like an “A” team - clearly they had only got together just before that game. They started well but the lack of match readiness showed in the second half. In contrast the Boks had both their first choice team that was a battle hardened unit - and they played their A game, as they did against the ABs first choice team in Wellington. In contrast the first choice ABs beat the then first choice Boks in Auckland - it was the best performance all year by the ABs - it was an A grade performance (the Bok dominance in the forwards notwithstanding).



...

613 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close