Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Beauden Barrett hesistant on Toulon move following Savea savaging

Will this deal help the Hurricanes keep hold of talents like Beauden Barrett? Photo / Getty Images.

Mourad Boudjellal’s savaging of star import Julian Savea could cost him the acquisition of future marquee players, including All Blacks playmaker Beauden Barrett.

ADVERTISEMENT

The 27-year-old first-five revealed Boudjellal’s harsh criticism of Savea would make him think twice about signing for the French giants, according to AAP.

Boudjellal has come under fire after lambasting Savea for a string of underwhelming performances and taking time off to attend his brother Ardie’s wedding in Fiji, saying that the former 54-test All Blacks wing was no longer welcome at the club, despite still having more than a year left on his two-season contract.

Additionally, Toulon fans have been viciously trolling Savea and his family as a result of his subpar performances, which has seen him score just once from 10 outings, where he has predominantly been played in the unfamiliar position of second-five.

Tima Savea, wife of Julian, was trolled online by Toulon fans following her husband’s poor performances. Photo / Twitter.

Savea responded on social media, saying he would honour his contract for as long as he was still signed with the club, prompting a wave of support from friends, family, players and fans from around the world.

That didn’t stop Boudjellal from doubling down on his original comments, though, with the French millionaire telling Le Parisien that the remainder of Savea’s contract will be “very long for him”.

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett, who is widely tipped to leave New Zealand following this year’s World Cup after fielding offers from clubs around the globe, wasn’t impressed with Boudjellal’s comments, saying he would have to re-think his options if Toulon were to come calling for his services.

“It certainly doesn’t help,” the 73-test, two-time World Rugby Player of the Year told reporters.

“Firstly, you’ve got to be comfortable. It’s a big move to move offshore and you have to be happy with a number of things.

“Your family have to be happy, you have to be happy with the coaching setup and team culture, so there are a number of different things.

“It’s totally different over there from what we see externally. It must be a different dynamic, it’s not the same as here.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Barrett has just returned to training following his honeymoon and is expected to feature in some capacity for the Hurricanes against the Crusaders in Christchurch this weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 6 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

17 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search