Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Australian teams have concerns over Sunwolves' demise

The Waratahs embrace. (Photo by Mark Kolbe/Getty Images)

NSW coach Daryl Gibson has expressed concern that the sounding of the Super Rugby death knell on the Sunwolves could lead to less games for the Waratahs.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We need rugby. That’s the important thing,” Gibson said ahead of Friday’s expected announcement from SANZAAR that the Tokyo-based franchise will be cut with the competition to revert to 14 teams from 2021.

A 14-team competition – after the completion of the current broadcast deal in 2020 – would likely result in a return to a round-robin format, also marking the end of the unpopular conference system.

But such a development would also mean the Waratahs – and all other teams – would only play 14 games during the home-and-away campaign, rather than the 16 they’ll play this season.

“It’s hard to say what the format is going to be. Is it going to be a round robin, is it going to be biannual home and away, who knows?” Gibson said.

“It’s certainly been a big issue for the competition in making sure the format is correct and that we do have a format where you’re not away from your home base for, say, four or five weeks on end.”

As will be the case this year when the Waratahs go four weeks between home games during a three-game spell in South Africa and Queensland.

ADVERTISEMENT

Gibson said NSW Rugby had always supported the Sunwolves’ inclusion in the competition and would like the states to have more of a say in the running of the competition.

Having played the Sunwolves in Tokyo three weeks ago, he felt Japanese rugby fans had embraced the expansion franchise.

“They’re getting excellent support,” Gibson said.

“The crowd numbers have probably gone through that period where you’ve got an expansion team trying to forge a new market and that’s something the four franchises here in Australia have done well in establishing with them.”

SANZAAR said in a statement on Wednesday it would make an announcement on the future format of Super Rugby on Friday at 2pm ( ADET).

ADVERTISEMENT

The announcement is again expected to come via a press release, rather than a media conference.

Queensland Reds utility back Isaac Lucas:

Video Spacer

-RugbyPass/AAP

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 4 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks in the World Cup final The All Blacks outplayed the Springboks
Search