Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

'There's no place for a rest in Test rugby' - Ashton stands by Lowe comments but says winger is 'amazing player'

By Josh Raisey
Chris Ashton and James Lowe /Getty

Chris Ashton has stood by his comments about Ireland winger James Lowe, saying “there’s no place for a rest” in Test rugby.

ADVERTISEMENT

Speaking to Jim Hamilton on RugbyPass’ All Access podcast, the Harlequins winger was quizzed about his description of Lowe as “too big, too heavy, too slow” in the wake of Ireland’s loss to England at Twickenham in November.

The 33-year-old qualified that statement on social media soon after, saying he was specifically referring to Jonny May’s try, and Lowe’s pedestrian attempt to trackback. Ashton then questioned if Lowe is being used correctly, as both he and Hamilton agreed that he is built like a centre.

Video Spacer

All Access: Chris Ashton on Steve Diamond, Sale Sharks, James Lowe and much, much more….

Video Spacer

All Access: Chris Ashton on Steve Diamond, Sale Sharks, James Lowe and much, much more….

“I happened to say for the Jonny May try that he looks a bit big and a little bit slow and I stand by it,” Ashton said. “He’s a top player, the things he has done for Leinster have changed some of Leinster’s attack and he’s been part of Championship winning teams, so obviously he is an amazing player. But he is naturally big, so if he’s [built like a] centre, my thinking is use him like a centre, you don’t get him chasing kicks. What is the point in James Lowe chasing kicks? He’s not going to be able to turn, come back, go again, he’s not going to be able to do what Jonny May does or Anthony Watson.

“In the way [Ireland] wanted to play against England, they’re not really using him enough. I watched them when they were in the 22 attacking, and he was just stood on his wing. I was like ‘go get the ball, go and play forward and just carry the ball,’ that’s what he needs to be doing.”

When asked if he is suited to Test rugby, Ashton responded: “From what I’ve seen, at that level, because the margins are so small, there’s no place for a rest or just clocking off for 30 seconds because something will happen in the game, momentum will change, and you could have solved that problem.

“So take that example of May’s try, he could have solved that problem for Ireland right there and then. He could have got back and done something out of the blue. You can’t always wait for a try-scoring moment, you’ve got to be everywhere all the time and that just takes a bit of learning and a bit of experience.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

B
Bull Shark 3 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Diamond demands law change while accusing Tigers of illegal activity Diamond demands law change while accusing Tigers of illegal activity
Search