Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

American muscle meets Tongan power as Eagles look for a big Pacific Island scalp

Lotu Inisi of Tonga. Photo by Toru Hanai - World Rugby/World Rugby via Getty Images

Thanks to a dramatic twenty-one-phase, backs-to-the-goal-line, clock-in-red defensive stand, the USA Eagles pulled off a 21-17 victory over Portugal last weekend.

ADVERTISEMENT

Impressive fitness and desire aside, the necessity of the heroics came as a result of repeated American miscues and missed opportunities, putting themselves in ever more creatively constructed holes to climb out of. As somewhat of a microcosm of their performances to date, the stand showcased a period of unflappable and impenetrable defensive work on the back of hair-pullingly frustrating decisions.

This week the Eagles will want to, if not consistently execute to their fullest, at least reduce the impact of their moments of pedestrian performance.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

On Saturday the USA will meet Tonga in Chambéry, France for an opportunity to build on the performance. Though Tonga has had the advantage in their last three meetings, those clashes date back to 2014 with the most recent coming during the 2019 World Cup.

Tonga, in fact, has had a poor run of play since their 2023 World Cup appearance, with their only win in their last seven matches coming against a struggling Canadian side. That said, the USA have never in recent memory convincingly beat any of the Pacific Island teams, and they’ll gear up for another physical clash on the weekend.

In the American camp, Scott Lawrence, known for hammering on the controllable non-negotiables, will place emphasis on the necessary improvements to set piece and the ensuing strikes. He’ll target an at-times loose Tongan defensive wall, knowing that a rapid and brutal three phase strike should open some doors for the big American ball runners to charge through.

In the Tongan camp, similarly emphasize set piece and cleaning up their attack continuity, aiming to release dangerous playmakers and allow their moments of flair to come off a solid platform.

ADVERTISEMENT

Overall, both teams will have some key areas to improve in order to control their destiny:

What Tonga Needs to Improve

Maul Defense – Romania mauled repeatedly and seemingly unstoppably over the top of Tonga, producing one try and multiple penalties, including a yellow card. American execution notwithstanding, the Eagles will certainly target this area, so Tonga will need to come up with a better strategy to stymie it. Outside of the maul itself, should the Americans begin galloping down the field as Romania did at times, the Eagles will launch their attack against a backpedaling and shorthanded defense.

Scrum Stability – Similar to the maul, Romania bossed the Tongans at the scrum, producing five penalties and plenty of strong attacking possibilities. More than just front-row dark magic, the Tonga scrum looked unstable from the set-up, with eight bodies pushing at different times and in different directions. Their forwards will spend plenty of time this week organizing into a more cohesive pack.

Patience in Attack – As expected, the Tongan moments of brilliance shined radiantly, but the missed opportunities perhaps darkened the overall hue. Starting with two tries in the first fifteen minutes, they only managed three points for the rest of the match. Consistent knock-ons, forward passes, and general lack of execution repeatedly left opportunities wanting. The Tongans have the talent to break defenses, but they’ll want to rely on more consistent structure to their attack until they see the right opportunity, rather than forcing offloads, passes, and kicks with low probability of success.

ADVERTISEMENT

Head-to-Head

Last 4 Meetings

Wins
1
Draws
0
Wins
3
Average Points scored
21
27
First try wins
25%
Home team wins
75%

What the USA Needs to Improve

Lineout – Winning only 50% of their own lineout, Greg Peterson’s men had a tough day in the lineout. They lost the only two lineouts they had within their opponent’s 22m, including a 5m lineout. With new cap Shilo Klein starting at hooker, one would expect some first-cap jitters, but even the movement and lifts looked a beat out of sync. The Eagles could have the most dangerous backline in the world, but if they cannot rely on clean ball with which to strike, they’ll find themselves repeatedly frustrated and second guessing themselves. 

Attacking Connectivity – With AJ MacGinty back in the number ten shirt, he looked every bit the Premiership star, but with a noticeable lack of connectivity with those around him. Multiple times a signature dummy or delayed pass would create space for him to exploit, only to find himself looking left and right for someone to run off his hip. Another week in camp should help this, but the American runners, especially the forwards, will want to make sure they can better anticipate when and how MacGinty will strike.

Consistency in Attack – With an early try by a rampaging Paddy Ryan, the Americans found a successful recipe– hard forward play to disrupt the defense, followed by a field switch off of ten to send the big boys galloping through the Portuguese backs. Somehow they either abandoned or found themselves unable to replicate this pattern for the rest of the match. Similar to the way Romania repeatedly used the maul and scrum throughout the match to consistently punish Tonga, when the Americans find an effective weapon they cannot grow bored of it. Sometimes effective rugby is boring rugby.

The Outcome

The American shortcomings seem far more fixable in a week of camp than a faltering Tongan scrum. Their work-ons rely more on eliminating the bad than building new fundamental proficiencies. However, given that the Tongans will also thrive in broken play similar to the Portuguese, should the Americans give the Tongans enough mistakes to capitalize off of they may not need to manufacture any scoring opportunities themselves. In the end, given that the Eagles improved steadily throughout the PNC, Lawrence and his staff have shown themselves capable of learning and implementing their lessons. USA to win by less than a try (though hopefully not in the last minute again, out of respect for my sanity).

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 54 minutes ago
The All Blacks don't need overseas-based players

I'm not sure you realise how extreme it is, previously over half of SR players ended up overseas. These days just over half finish their career at home (some of those might carry on in lower leagues around the world).


1. Look at a player like Mo'unga who took time to become comfortable at his max level, thrust a player like that in well above his level, something Farrell is possibly doing now with Pendergrast, and you fail to maximise your player base as a whole. I don't think you realise the balance in NZ, without controlling who can leave there is indeed right now an immediate risk from any further pressure on the balance. We are not as flush as a country like South Africa I can't imagine (look at senior mens numbers).


2. Your idea excludes foreign fans, not the current status, their global 1.8mil base (find a recent article about it) will dwindle. Our clubs don't compete against each other, it's a central model were all players have a flat max 200k contribution. NZR decides who is worth keeping for the ABs in a very delicate balance of who to let go and who not. Might explain why our Wellington game wasn't a sellout.


3. Players aren't going to play for their country for nothing while other players are getting a million dollars. How much does SARU pay or reimburse their players?


4. I don't believe that at all. Everything so far has pointed to becoming an AB as the 'profile' winner. Comms love telling their fans some 'lucky' 1 cap guy is an "All Black" and the audience goes woooh!

The reality is much more likely to be more underwhelming

But the repercussions are end game, so why is it worth the risk?

Hardly be poaching uni or school boys.

This comment is so out of touch with rugby in NZ.

European comps aren't exactly known for poaching unproven talent ie SR or up not down to NPC.

So, so out of touch. Never heard of Jamison Gibson-Park, or Bundee Aki, or Chandler Cunningham-South, what about Uino Atonio? Numerous kiwi kids, like Warner Dearns, are playing in Japan having left after some stardom in school rugby here. Over a third of the NRL (so basically a third of the URC) are Kiwis who likely been scouted playing rugby at school. France have recently started in that path with Patrick Tuifua, and you hear loosely about good kids taking up offers to go overseas for basic things like school/uni (avg age 20+), similar to what attracts island kids to NZ.


But that's getting off track, it's too far in the future for you to conceptualize in this discussion. Where here because you think you know what it's like to need to select overseas based players, because of similarities like NZ and SA both having systems that funnel players into as few teams as possible in order to make them close to international quality, while also having a semi pro domestic league that produces an abundance of that talent, all the while facing similar financial predicaments. I'm not using extremes like some do, to scare monger away from making any changes. I am highlighting where the advantages don't cross over to the NZ game like the do for South Africa.


So while you are right in a lot of respects, some things that the can be taken for granted, is that if not more players leave, higher calibre players definitely will, and that is going to weaken the domestic competitions global reach, which will make it much hard to keep up or overtake the rest of the world. To put it simply, the domestic game is the future. International rugby is maxed out already, and the game here somehow needs to double it's revenue.


This is what you need to align your pitch with. Not being able to select players from overseas, because there are only ever one or two of those players. Sometimes even no one who'd be playing overseas and good enough for the ABs. You might be envisioning the effects of extremes, because it's hard to know just how things change slightly, but you know it's not going to be good.

94 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ 'Razor's conservatism is in danger of halting New Zealand's progress' 'Razor's conservatism is in danger of halting New Zealand's progress'
Search