Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Blacks player ratings vs Argentina | The Rugby Championship

Jordie Barrett of New Zealand celebrates after winning a Rugby Championship match between Argentina Pumas and New Zealand All Blacks at Estadio Malvinas Argentinas on July 08, 2023 in Mendoza, Argentina. (Photo by Daniel Jayo/Getty Images)

The All Blacks kicked off the 2023 Rugby Championship campaign with an impressive 41-12 win over Argentina in Mendoza after a first half blitz saw the visitors up by 31-0 at the half.

ADVERTISEMENT

Los Pumas fought back to win the second half as the All Blacks defence was tested frequently, but they couldn’t mount a successful charge to give the home crowd much to cheer about.

Here’s how the All Blacks rated in Mendoza:

1. Ethan de Groot – 7.5

The All Blacks pack stood up and controlled both the set-piece and the gain line. The front row dominated at scrum time taking five penalties from the set-piece. De Groot had a large part in that while getting through a solid work rate around the park, getting through six tackles and five carries. Off at 53 mins.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

2. Dane Coles – 7.5

Opened the scoring after running a great support line outside of Scott Barrett to break through and dash 20 metres home. The lineout functioned well, connecting with young lock Josh Lord and Scott Barrett as his main targets, with Shannon Frizell at the tail. There was one mishap overthrow but for the most part it was clean ball off the top for Aaron Smith or a solid maul foundation. Off at 45 mins.

3. Tyrel Lomax – 8

The tighthead prop was key to the scrummaging effort which milked penalty after penalty to piggyback down the field. Nearly every Pumas’ error ended with an All Blacks penalty from the ensuing scrum. Lomax had one big tackle on the goal line which helped prevent a try with Argentina still on 0 points. Finished with eight tackles in total. Off at 60 mins.

4. Scott Barrett – 9

One of the All Blacks best on the day, Scott was immense in close quarters putting in some dominant hits. Finished with nine belting tackles on the afternoon, was a key target at the lineout, while getting around the park doing the dirty work at the breakdowns. Had six carries also, including the try assist to Coles with some nice hands at the line.

ADVERTISEMENT

5. Josh Lord – 7

The young Chiefs lock stood up and made his mark as he took on the fiery Argentine pack. Didn’t take a step back. Was the primary lineout target early on and ran the plays effectively. Pressured the Pumas’ lineout a couple of times, nearly coming up with a steal but it was knocked-on. Off at 53 mins.

6. Shannon Frizell – 7.5

An industrious performance from Frizell whose off-the-ball work at the set-piece, maul, and rucks was underrated. Got through 11 tackles, including three dominant as well as 12 carries.

7. Sam Cane – 8

The All Blacks captain was penalised once in the first half for tackling a man without the ball but other than that was out delivering punishing hits as he got through a team high 15 tackles. His rib tickler on winger Sebastian Cancelliere was a highlight, who tried to run down Cane’s channel off a scrum. The No 7 crunched him and the ball spilled loose for a turnover.

ADVERTISEMENT

8. Ardie Savea – 7.5

What was deemed as a ‘quiet’ day from Savea still included 15 carries. The workhorse No 8 was the main ball carrier coming out of trouble, to get the All Blacks out of their own half. He had a key carry off a lineout on their own goal line, taking a deliberate overthrow on the five and powering his way to the edge of the 22 to give the side breathing space. Added a ruck turnover in the second half to repel a Pumas’ wave of attack and scored a try from close range on a pick and go.

9. Aaron Smith – 7.5

Provided good service all afternoon in the sunny and dry conditions as the All Blacks controlled their ruck effectively. Ball of the top of the lineout was offered up to second five-eighth Jordie Barrett frequently on a nice, flat Smith pass. Late in the first the All Blacks let a few ruck turnovers creep in, not Smith’s fault, but he bounced back from those turnovers and stole a try from close range with a big dummy.

10. Damian McKenzie – 8

A shaky start with a charged clearance kick but the crisis was averted by McKenzie diving on the loose ball. Cleared lines well after that and patrolled the backfield well with Beauden Barrett, who also took some of the load at first receiver off McKenzie.

He got better as the game went on, providing a try assist for Rieko Ioane with a flat short ball, another one to Beauden after a clean break off the scrum, and a final third assist to debutant Emoni Narawa. His goal kicking was really the only blemish on a brilliant performance from the No 10, who spent the last 20 minutes at fullback.

All Blacks forwards took a lot of carries off Smith while McKenzie looked to spark a strike in tandem with Beauden Barrett a couple of times with some switch plays pivoting direction off the rucks.

11. Caleb Clarke – 7

The Blues winger didn’t get a lot of space in this clash but he offered up a reliable and valuable performance. He was solid under the high ball, always strong in contact and provided on occasion with his passing game. It was Clarke’s deft pass that freed up the Barrett brothers for a long range strike down the blind side. He had an offload to Beauden Barrett after taking a crossfield kick that was knocked down five metres from the line. On another day that sticks and Barrett walks in.

12. Jordie Barrett – 9.5 

This was a tremendous showing by the younger Barrett at No 12, who was the focal point of the All Blacks set-piece attack. In the first half he carried hard into the Pumas defence and offered Ioane a flat ball on occasion, before opening up his options in the second half and linking more out the back. A backdoor pass provided a line break for McKenzie, who converted it into a try with a final pass to Beauden.

He linked up with brother Beauden down the blindside to create & finish a long range strike in the first half. In defence he was up to the challenge, logging 15 tackles as he chopped down Argentinian runners everywhere across the park. He helped save a try in cover defence, combining with Narawa to hammer Matias Moroni over the sideline by the corner flag. He even added a ruck turnover late in the second half.

A commanding performance from the midfielder that delivered the game plan nearly to perfection.

13. Rieko Ioane – 8.5

Ioane was outstanding in this match, not overplaying his hand but playing the role of supporting centre exceptionally. Had a line break early, the first of the afternoon, and then hit a hard angle against the grain and beat three defenders for a try a short while after that. Kept running the short option line outside Barrett with intent every time, even though mostly ended up as a decoy. Defended the outside channels really well with both wingers.

14. Emoni Narawa – 8

Almost had a dream start when he pulled in a spilled Beauden Barrett bomb with his second touch and raced away down the right hand touchline. However, he was chased down by the Pumas cover defence. Was dangerous on the flank any time the ball came his way, although there was timing issue on a strike play that saw Caleb Clarke’s wide pass sail into touch in front of him. Defensively was strong and the Pumas didn’t find success that way. Finished his debut with a well earned try after McKenzie found him unmarked on the edge.

15. Beauden Barrett – 9

Answered the critics with a resounding performance in the No 15 jersey. Scored a try, and set-up another to brother Jordie, while kicking well out-of-hand to deliver the All Blacks kicking plan, which was to bomb infield out of exit zones and put the back three under the spotlight.

Covered space well in the backfield and produced a double team effort with McKenzie to bring down No 8 Rodrigo Bruni to save a try. Was like two lions taking down a buffalo. Was off at 60 mins for Mo’unga, who went into 10 with McKenzie moving to fullback.

Reserves

16. Codie Taylor 7 – had the most minutes coming in early and performed very well, making a heap of tackles and keeping the line integrity in tact. Made his throws for the most part with one pinched.
17. Ofa Tu’ungafasi – 6 – Slipped a couple of tackles but work rate was high and carried hard.
18. Nepo Laulala – 6 – Same for Nepo but overall was a good bench performance on defence, as Pumas only cracked them once late with a barge over try.
19. Tupou Vaa’i – 8 – Came on for Lord and was exceptional, took many lineouts, was physical on defence and came up with a lineout steal.
20. Dalton Papalii – 6 – High energy burst from Dalton who only got 14 minutes of action
21. Finlay Christie – 6 – Came on and provided good service but the All Blacks attack couldn’t muster much late.
22. Richie Mo’unga – 6 – Offered some decent distribution and kicked a lot to close out the game but made a couple of errors.
23. Braydon Ennor N/A – came on for eight minutes but didn’t see enough action to rate.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

125 Comments
S
Sandy 556 days ago

I'm not sure it's as dominant as commentators are saying. I suspect the cleanout from the ruck will be tested against the lines of South Africa as well be the rush defence. South Africa have a massive pack and I don't think we'll see penalties going the way of the all Black's at scrum time. It's going to be a different story next week.

P
Pecos 556 days ago

Far too generous. Reduce all by .5 as Los Pumas didn't front up.

G
Geoffrey 557 days ago

Well done Ian Foster and co. Couldn’t do more against a rusty Argentina. We’ll know after the Boks. Shannon Frizell put up his hand for no 6 especially as a line out option. Scooter is the form no 4.

p
peladobergman 557 days ago

Are we going to talk about Sam Cane? He deserves an exemplary sanction from World Rugby -involving a long suspension- for his absolutely shameful, extremely violent and reprehensible action of kicking a kid with absolute malice and sadism.

What would have been saying if the player involved was Lavanini, Kremer, Matera, an Italian, a Fijian or a Geogrian?

These shaped bodies with tonified muscles are meant to be used within a field, according to the laws of the game and the interpretation given by the refs. Any usage of violence outside the boundaries of the field should come under scrutiny. This episode in particular must fell under the scrutiny and ambivalence of World Rugby

J
Jeremy 557 days ago

Agree with those ratings although I'm still not sure about BB if we are picking our number one team. The most pleasing thing for me was the performance of the second row. This AB's team is better when Scooter is playing there, and Josh Lord is one for the future.

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 5 hours ago
Six former All Blacks eligible for new nations in 2025

He wasn't, he was only there a couple of years. Don't get me wrong, he's a player of promise, but without ever having a season at 10 at that level, one could hardly ever think he would be in line to take over.


But if you really want to look at your question deeper, we get to that much fabled "production line" of the Crusaders. I predict you'll know what I mean when I say, Waikato, Waikato, Queensland.


I don't know everything about him (or his area I mean) but sure, it wouldnt have just been Razor that invested in him, and that's not to say he's the only 10 to have come out of that academy in the last half dozen years/decade since Mo'unga, but he is probably the best. So it's a matter of there having been no one else why it was so easy for people to picture him being razors heir apparent (no doubt he holds him in more high regard than the blurb/reference of his recently published though). And in general there is very much a no paching policy at that level which you may not appreciate .


For England? Really? That's interesting. I had just assumed he was viewed as club man and that national aspect was just used to entice him over. I mean he could stil be used by Scotland given I wouldn't expect them to have a whole lot of depth even thoe fh's one of their strongest positions at the moment. But certainly not England.


Personally I still think that far more likely was the reason. He would/could have done the same for Crusaders and NZ, just without half as much in his pocket. And as an individual I certainly don't think he'd have chosen England over the All Blacks (as a tru blue kiwi i mean), and he of all people should know where he sits. He said he wants to play internationally, so I take that at face value, he didn't think that could be for NZ, and he might have underestimated (or been mislead by McCall) England (and Scotland really), or have already chosen Scotland at the time, as seems the case from talk of his addition.


Again though, he's a player who I'd happily rate outside the trifecta of Barrett/McKenzie/Mo'unga in basic ability , even on par with foreign players like Plummer, Sopoaga, Ioane, and ahead of a bunch in his era like Falcon, Trask, Reihana. I've done the same thing >.< excluding Perofeta from the 10 debate. Hes probably below him but I think pero is a 15 now.

31 Go to comments
J
JW 7 hours ago
Six former All Blacks eligible for new nations in 2025

What do you mean should?


Are you asking these questions because you think they are important reasons a player should decide to represent a country?


I think that is back the front. They are good reasons why someone 'would' be able to choose Fiji (say in the case of Mo'unga's cousin who the Drua brought into their environment), but not reason's why they "should". Those need to be far more personal imo.


If you think it was me suggesting he "should" play for Fiji, I certainly wasn't suggesting that. I was merely suggesting he would/could because ther'ye very close to his heart with his dad having represented them.


I did go on to say the right sort of environment should be created to encourage them to want to represent Fiji (as with case of their european stars it's always a fine balance between wanting to play for them and other factors (like compared with personal develop at their club). but that is also not trying to suggest those players should want to play for Fiji simply because you make the prospect better, you're simply allowing for it to happen.


TLDR I actually sent you to the wrong post, I was thinking more about my reply to HU's sentiments with yours. Instead of running you around I'll just paste it in

What's wrong with that? Hoskins Sotutu could be selected for the Maori All Blacks, then go on latter and move to England and represent them, then once his career in England (no longer at that standard) is over move to Japan and finish his career playing for Fiji. Why should he not be able to represent any or all of those teams?

Actually I can't remember if it was that message or whether it indeed was my hypothetical Fiji example that I wanted to suggest would improve the International game, not cheapen it.


I suppose I have to try and explain that idea further now. So you say it cheapens the game. They game is already "cheap" when a nation like Fiji is only really allowed to get their full team going in a WC year. Or even it's the players themselves only caring about showing up in a WC year. To me this is a problem because a Fiji campaign/season isn't comparable to their competitors (in a situation where they're say ranked in the top 8. Take last year for instance. Many stars were absent of the Pacific Nations Cup, for whatever reason, but hey, when their team is touring a big EU nation like England or Ireland, wow suddenly theyre a high profile team again and they get the stars back.


Great right? No. Having those players come back was probably detrimental to the teams performance. My idea of having Sotutu and Bower encouraged (directly or indirectly) to play for Fiji is merely as a means to an end, to give the Flying Fijians the profile to both enrich and more accurately reflect the international game. You didn't really state what you dislike but it's easy to guess, and yes, this idea does utilize that aspect which does devalue the game in other cases, so I wanted to see if this picture would change that in this example (just and idea I was throwing out their, like I also said in my post, I don't actually think Sotutu or any of these players are going anywhere, even Ioane might still be hopeful of being slected).


The idea again, raise the visibility on the PNC so that can stand as a valued tournament on it's own and not require basic funded by WR to continue, but not enough to involve all the best players (even Japan treated it as a chance to play it's amatuers). Do this by hosting the PI island pool in places like Melbourne every other year, include some very high profile and influential team in it like an All Black team, and yes, by the nations getting together and creating ways to increase it's popularity by say asking individuals like Sotutu and Bower to strength it's marketability, with the hopeful follow on affect that stars like Botia and Radradra always want to (and can) represent their country. With Fiji as the example, but do it with Samoa and Tonga as well. They will need NZ and Aus (Japan) assistance to make a reality imo.


I don't believe this cheapens the game, I believe it makes it more valued as you're giving players the choice of who they chose to play for rather than basing it off money. Sotutu would never have forgone his paycheck to play for Fiji instead of NZ at the beginning, so you should viewed his current choice as 'cheap'

31 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING 10 of the best transfer signings for Super Rugby Pacific 2025 10 of the best transfer signings
Search