Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

‘There’s no guarantees’: All Blacks coach provides injury update on Sam Whitelock

By Finn Morton
Sam Whitelock of the All Blacks looks on during a New Zealand All Blacks training session at Mt Smart Stadium on June 30, 2023 in Auckland, New Zealand. (Photo by Hannah Peters/Getty Images)

Assistant coach Jason Ryan has provided an injury update on lock Sam Whitelock ahead of the All Blacks’ opening Bledisloe Cup clash with the Wallabies in Melbourne.

ADVERTISEMENT

After signing with French club Pau, Whitelock almost had his final season with the Crusaders cut painfully short by a persistent Achilles injury.

But to the surprise of many, including All Blacks coach Ian Foster, Whitelock started for the champion franchise in last month’s Super Rugby Pacific final against the Chiefs.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

Playing his 178th and final match for the Crusaders, Whitelock was named the Player of the Final after helping the team win their seventh title in as many years.

But Whitelock wasn’t out of the woods just yet. After joining the All Blacks in Auckland, Whitelock missed some training sessions – and ultimately the opening Test of the year against Los Pumas.

Related

Coach Foster confirmed that the veteran was available for last weekend’s Test against the Springboks, but the All Blacks decided to give Whitelock more time to recover.

With a fortnight between that match and the All Blacks’ date with the Wallabies in Melbourne, Whitelock appears to be tracking towards a return to the international arena.

ADVERTISEMENT

“Sammy’s coming along nicely now,” coach Jason Ryan said on Sky Sport’s The Breakdown. “It’s done him the world of good to get the best work into his Achilles possible.

“He’s selectable, we know that. What we’ve shown is that we’ve got depth in locks and there is genuine competition in this team right now and that’s exciting.

“We had a catchup this morning as selectors and there’s some headaches and that’s how it should be with the All Blacks.

“We’re pretty happy with how things are progressing there and guys are competing every day at training, and if they’re doing that they might get an opportunity in the black jersey but there’s no guarantees.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Fletcher Newell, Joe Moody and David Havili have also been sidelined with injuries this season, and are yet to don the black jersey in 2023.

But as coach Ryan confirmed, all three players are “definitely in our discussions” ahead of this year’s Rugby World Cup in France.

“They’ve been in with us all last week as well, same with Davy Havili, he’s been in as well,” he added.

“It’s been great for them to see what we’re doing, sitting in the meetings.

“They’re definitely in our discussions, 100 per cent they are.”

The All Blacks take on fierce rivals Australia at the Melbourne Cricket Ground later this month. Then, the New Zealanders will return to Aotearoa for the reverse fixture in Dunedin.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE NOW - Singapore SVNS Day 1

Fresh Starts | Episode 3 | Cobus Reinach

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

The Breakfast Show | Episode 7

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 9 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

24 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed What assistant coaches actually do, and why Parling and Bleyendaal will succeed
Search