Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

All Blacks Sevens react to drawing 'pool of death' in Dubai

Roderick Solo delivers the pass for the All Blacks Sevens. Photo by MICHAEL BRADLEY/AFP via Getty Images

SVNS season is fast approaching and training is ramping up for the All Blacks Sevens squad, with eyes on a revamped inaugural title.

ADVERTISEMENT

The men in black, who will be defending their 2023 series win, have been dealt an almighty challenge in the opening round, coming up against two of their strongest rivals in Dubai over the first weekend of December.

With the teams reduced to 12 for the new format tournament, only the best of the best will participate and each pool for the Dubai leg has a claim for the “pool of death” title.

Video Spacer

Video Spacer

New Zealand’s opponents will be 2023 Capetown champions, Samoa, and most recent Dubai victors, South Africa, along with Canada.

Incoming head coach and sevens legend Tomasi Cama says the reduction in teams to make for three pools of four rather than four pools of four will mean fans get nail-biting action and heavyweight hitouts right from the start of day one.

“I guess because of the format now with 12 teams and the way the draw has been set up with these few top teams in the same pool, I think it’s going to be good for the tournament,” he told SENZ.

“You’re going to see, consistently, good games, big teams playing each other in pool stages rather than waiting for day two. Which means there’s not going to be any easy games, we have to be on our toes from the get-go. So, we’re certainly looking forward to that.”

ADVERTISEMENT

Related

The New Zealand men will head into the competition with not just the 2023 series win but also the Oceania Sevens title under their belt, having won the competition in Brisbane earlier this month.

Given the high-intensity nature of sevens, Cama was pleased to see his team in damaging form just weeks out from the SVNS season opener.

“We were very happy, I mean we went over a week earlier to do our camp over there. We didn’t do a lot of rugby stuff, we just kind of let the boys play and see where they’re at around the game.

“But, overall we can see where they’re at physically and obviously around the game. Obviously playing Fiji, Samoa and Australia, we were happy the way we played against those three. Obviously, they’re all top six in the world as well so, pretty happy with where we’re at around our prep, even the way we played last week to manage to come away with a win, can give us a bit of confidence going into Dubai.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

6 Comments
K
KELLY 602 days ago

IRB 7s CURCUIT;

 

Hopefully the IRB WR 7s rugby circuit RE imagine their format even more and change the way they format their games very soon, so all the top teams play each other often. Otherwise why watch the 7s IRB rugby circuit when it’s not a real competition.

 

This new IRB format is a nonsense format, where no teams form counts until the last round like having 40 odd practice games. As none of the six first round games really amount to anything as all the top eight teams make the final anyway. The old IRB ladder system was much better.

 

Especially when the IRBS 7s format usually means only the top teams can win this bias tournament, which makes the IRB 7s circuit very boring!

 

Presently the IRB champions aren’t the real champions as a team of champions beats a big pool of teams at every IRB circuit, that aren't necessarily the teams that make final. Making the comp worth watching because presently winning on the IRB circuit depends on who you play. Making the game a shame not a game!

 

By having all of their IRB 7s series top 12 teams put in TWO pools of six teams, ranked in each pool from the previous IRB sevens ladder standings. POOL ONE 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11: POOL TWO 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12:

 

Would create a real competition as then all the IRB circuit teams would regularly play each other. Then have the top two teams from each pool after their round robin of 30 games play in the semis for the bronze Final and the big FINAL. Which still takes seven games to the win the Final, but is very competitive spectator wise. Which is 63/4 competitive games spread over three days.

 

Or 128 games in the men’s and women’s divisions held over 3 days, which should be accomplishable. With 14 manned squads for nutrition and two or three rugby fields at each location?

 

And by having the bottom four teams after the IRB circuit having to challenge the top two teams from the challenging series. Would create a pool of 6 teams playing in a round robin or three to make the top four as core teams. To RE merge with the IRBs top 8 IRB teams for the next years IRB circuit. Giving the new challenging teams ‘time’ to develop their game!

 

They also need to evolve the rules of the game to speed the game up a heap to save time to score more tries, the games have become predictable and boring!

 

Making the 7s IRB circuit very good to watch that would eventually pay for itself, ‘you’d think!

 

MENS POOLS:

                  

POOL ONE;-----------------POOL TWO;

 

1st NEW ZEALAND------------------2nd ARGENTINA

3rd FRANCE---------------------------4th FIJI 5th AUSTRALIA-----------------------6th SAMOA

7th SOUTH AFRICA------------------8th IRELAND 9th USA---------------------------------10th GREAT BRITIAN

11th SPAIN----------------------------12th CANADA

 

WOMEN’S POOLS

 

POOL ONE;-----------------POOL TWO;

 

1st NEW ZEALAND------------------2nd AUSTRALIA 3rd USA--------------------------------4th FRANCE

5th IRELAND-------------------------6th FIJI

7th GREAT BRTIAN-----------------8th JAPAN

9th CANADA-------------------------10th SPAIN 11th BRAZIL-------------------------12TH CHINA

 

By Adopting these five 7s rugby ELVS would mean all the squads on the 7s rugby IRB circuit could win a tournament or two. And would stop the IRB circuit’s predictable boring outcomes?

 

Who wants to watch a one-sided comp where many squads can’t win it because of its rules? What are ELVs for. These rules would speed the game up and improve its spectacle dramatically. In the order they’re in?

 

The IRB sevens squads need to have 14 in their squads to have a seven manned bench to help rehydrate the team if these five 7s EVLs were used?

 

1/ Seven points awarded for a try under the posts, would save a lot of time, to get more tries.

 

2/ Use the drop goal-line drop-out. Which should already be a law as it’s very hard in sevens rugby to hold a player up over the goal-line, and that type of defence deserves a break. To get to kick the ball away from their goal-line!

 

3/ All conversions to be taken by the person who scored the try, even if it’s a forward because a scrubbed conversion by a forward would create plenty of time for an extra try or six. Making it far easier to get six quick unconverted tries to win, than to get 4 converted tries to ‘WIN’ a game.

 

4/ Having one-minute yellow cards for all deliberate knocks-ons and for some cynical game momentum changing fouls, that stops a try from being scored. Would suit any team as having two-minute ‘yellow cards’ is far too long and destroys the games spectacle.

 

5/ Having two-minute replacement red cards” for dangerous play, and put that player on TMO ‘RE view for a game or for a few game suspensions.

 

 

 

K
KELLY 602 days ago

EXACTLY

P
Pecos 602 days ago

The new format’s a joke imo. You have 7 tourneys to get the top 8 who qualify for the finals tourney, winner take all. So all of this is merely to make the top 8/12. Ridiculous.

K
KELLY 602 days ago

EXACTLY!

Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 10 minutes ago
Beauden Barrett weighs in on controversial yellow card

It’s an interesting question because a normal diberate knock on is just a penalty offense, an normal infringement like any other, so that’s deemed where the was not a reasonable chance to catch the ball.


But it’s a ruling that can also be upgraded to a foul, and by association, a yellow card, when it’s it was also deliberately trying to deny the ball to another player. For instance, that is why they are just given penalties up the field, because the player has just made a bad decision (one where he had no reasonable chance) and he doesn’t really care if the pass had gone to hand for his opponents or not (he was just thinking about being a hero etc).


So the way the refs have been asked to apply the law is to basically just determine whether there was an overlap (and not to try and guess what the player was actually thinking) or not, as to whether it’s a penalty or a YC.


This is the part Barrett doesn’t like, he’s essentially saying “but I had no idea whether they were likely to score or not (whether there was an unmarked man), so how can you tell me I was deliberately trying to prevent it going to someone, it could have been a blind pass to no one”.


It’s WR trying to make it clear cut for fans and refs, if at the players expense.

But yes, also you must think it entirely possible given both were foul plays that they could both go to the bench. Much the same as we see regularly when even though the play scores a try, they have started sending the player off still.


And while I agree Narawa didn’t knock it on, I think the ball did go forward, just off the shoulder. As his hands were up in the air, above the ball, basically like a basketball hope over his right shoulder, I guess you’re right in that if it did make contact with his hands it would have had to be deflected backwards onto his shoulder etc. Looking at the replay, Le Garrec clearly lost control of the ball forward too, but because Barrett was deemed to have committed a deliberate act, that overrides the knockon from 9.


I just don’t understand how they can consider it a deliberate attempt to block a pass when he actually lost the ball forward!

44 Go to comments
H
Hellhound 2 hours ago
Bok rule-benders are changing the game. They deserve respect

You want a lot of things that will never happen. You describe rugby League. You should go and watch that then. Rugby is supposed to be competitive. It's the opposition team that should figure out how to defend and turn it into an attack on the fly. The Boks play within the rules. Everyone says that kick off should have been a penalty. The law state that from a kick off it's a scrum. It's confusing as with mauls and rucks, the player has to be behind the kicker. The same does not hold true for kick offs. That law they can change, because the same rule should apply across the board for players to be behind the kicker. It's not the first time that the infield lineout has been used, only the first time in an international match. If I remember correctly, the Barbarians used it against England in 2021 or 2022 (under correction). It's also been used in SR during the 2000’s. There is just this big hoo haw because the Boks did it. If it was another team like the Irish or England or the French or someone, it would be innovative, genius and brilliant. The dummy the AB's did where a player broke to the right, acting like he had the ball, meanwhile the scrumhalfs ran down the sideline and scored. I don't hear you cry about that. That can be seen as cynical play and there is even a case for unsportsmanlike behaviour and at a minimum a yellow card. Yet there is silence from you about that. I on the other hand thought that was a great tactic. It's also not a new invention, but an old one. You only love rugby when it suits you. I don't care what new tactics teams use, or whoever the team is that is doing it. Every new invention or tactic or play that the coaches comes up with is great for rugby. It keeps it interesting. There is no law that prevents other coaches using the same tactics or create their own. It's up to coaches to come up with defense strategies to cut that down, and even retaliate against it. The game is never boring. It keeps evolving. People keep talking about rugby and all these things is what draw new fans. They don't want boring. They want innovative and fun. They want to hear the crash of bodies. They want to see the strength of the scrums. They want to see the speed, agility and flair of the players. The amazing passes and jukes or side steps. The only reason you are so up in arms is because the Boks did it and now you want it banned. The same rhyme over and over. Matt Williams wannabe. Nah, you don't love rugby or else you would enjoy the most exciting era yet in this lovely sport. Stars in so many national teams has never been more abundant nor was there so many teams that could beat each other on any given day. Not to even mention watching an era of the most controversial but most innovative and clever coach ever. A dynasty that's to last for a very long time even after he retires. Like him or hate him, his genius is undeniable and he is recognised world wide as the best coach in most countries by fans and pundits alike, even if they don't like him. Stop the hate and rather enjoy what's to come.

39 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Andy Farrell accused of 'devaluing the Lions' with latest selection call Andy Farrell under heavy fire for latest Lions selection call