6 Premiership clubs - including Saracens - confirm lockdown pay cuts
Squads at six of the Gallagher Premiership’s dozen clubs have agreed a 25 per cent wage cut following the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic that has brought the 2019/20 season to a standstill.
Premiership officials have confirmed a minimum five-week fixtures suspension and it has led to Bristol, Wasps, Gloucester, Worcester, Leicester and Saracens confirming they have taken drastic action to combat the sudden stop of matchday revenues flowing through the game.
Freddie Burns takes RugbyPass through his fitness regime during the coronavirus lockdown
Bath have also confirmed they will have further meetings next week with their players about mirroring the tough choices taken elsewhere in an effort to stop finances falling too much into the red in these unprecedented times for the sport around the world.
Other than Exeter Chiefs, all of the participating Premiership clubs habitually report a financial loss at the end of a season. In the most recent set of accounts filed at Companies House in April 2019, nearly £50million was collectively lost between the 13 clubs, a figure that included London Irish who had been relegated to the Championship.
Exeter had increased turnover by more than £3m and recorded a profit of £533,000, but champions Saracens, in sharp contrast, had lost nearly £4m. With rugby now halted eleven months on from the publication of those worrying numbers, worried Premiership clubs have now asked their players to take a hefty pay cut.
Here, RugbyPass summarises the various statements released by each of the clubs who have opted to cut their bills for the coming month at least:
BRISTOL BEARS
CEO Mark Tainton posted an open letter on the Bristol website confirming their intention to cut their cloth during the coronavirus layoff. “We are facing some extremely tough financial challenges during these unprecedented times,” he explained.
“This fast-developing global situation affects all of us; our friends, family, jobs and financial security, Bristol Bears is no different. Without matchday revenue and central funding from Premiership Rugby, the club have had to take some very difficult decisions to ensure the future security of the Bears and the competition.
“Our industry has been impacted significantly by the economic downturn and we have been given no choice but to take action. Therefore, we regret to announce that from April 1, players and staff will receive a reduction in salary during this unprecedented period without competitive rugby.
“Pat Lam and I spoke to all the players and staff via video link on Friday to communicate this difficult message and answer any questions. The team recognise the pressures and concerns that our community is feeling.
“There are still uncertain times to come, but the most important thing is that we stick together as a collective and remain connected in our Bears culture that we have worked so tirelessly to build. Our commitment to training hard individually, preparing diligently and supporting community projects doesn’t change.”
An open letter from CEO Mark Tainton.
— Bristol Bears (@BristolBears) March 20, 2020
WASPS
In an open letter to fans, CEO Stephen Vaughan explained the cutbacks that were happening at the club. “We are living through extraordinary times and none of us can predict the future or speculate when the current situation will end.
“With this in mind, we need to take some extremely difficult and significant action to reduce costs immediately so we can resume doing what we love when this is all over. The impact of these decisions is going to be felt across the whole business.
“Having discussed this situation at length with my colleagues from across the league, as well as Premiership Rugby, we are putting in place salary reductions of 25 per cent across the majority of the rugby department until we are playing Gallagher Premiership matches again. These measures will take effect from April 1. A number of lower-paid staff will be excluded from these salary reductions.
“I spoke with Lee Blackett and senior members of the playing squad Thursday night, and we then communicated this message to the wider team and colleagues. I could not be more proud of their response, understanding and determination to help the club in such testing times.
“These are extraordinary times which call for extraordinary and robust measures. We do not know with any certainty how long these reductions will be in place, but we will review the situation on an ongoing basis and continue to keep the entire Wasps family up to date with developments.”
An open letter to fans, partners, staff and community from our CEO.
? https://t.co/DgdGgmWPsd pic.twitter.com/xMvjM8ahF5
— Wasps Rugby (@WaspsRugby) March 20, 2020
GLOUCESTER
CEO Lance Bradley issued a letter outlining what measures have been taken at Kingsholm to tackle the crisis. “This is a fast-moving situation and we are all having to adjust our plans on a regular basis,” he wrote. “Like many businesses, this is difficult for Gloucester as income from matchdays, tickets, club memberships, conference and events and sponsors is critical for the club.
“In terms of staff, we are still working hard and doing our best to stay safe and healthy and follow all Government guidance. Our staff are in the position where the majority can work remotely, and we have taken the difficult decision to close Kingsholm Stadium and our conference and events facilities until April 20.
“We have also implemented a 25 per cent salary reduction across everyone at the club in order to see us through this incredibly challenging time… we will be back as a team with a vengeance as soon as we can!”
Following the announcement earlier this week regarding the postponement of the next four rounds of the Gallagher Premiership as well as Premiership Rugby Shield and Tyrrells Premier 15s matches, we wanted to further update our fans. https://t.co/phIKwjaBjk pic.twitter.com/0DdTsLyttq
— Gloucester Rugby (@gloucesterrugby) March 20, 2020
WORCESTER WARRIORS
Warriors issued a general statement detailing their measures. “Like many other businesses in the country, Worcester are having to deal with circumstances that are unprecedented in peacetime,” read their statement.
“Among the measures we have put in place is a temporary lockdown of Sixways during the five-week period that matches played under the auspices of Premiership Rugby are postponed. That clearly presents challenges for the running of the business, in particular cash-flow.
It is important that we make decisions now to ensure that, when we emerge from this dreadful crisis, we still have a sustainable rugby club… in the short-term, all our staff will take a 25 per cent pay cut effective from April 1.
“The 25 per cent reduction will not apply to staff below a certain salary threshold to ensure they are protected. We have offered as much support as we can to any member of staff who may suffer particular hardship as a consequence.
“We appreciate this is not an ideal situation for anyone but we hope that with the support of our loyal and dedicated staff in these difficult and challenging times that we can manage our way through this period.”
Club Statement | #TogetherWarriors
? https://t.co/hBxxkOlGOH pic.twitter.com/yLUi1W8LAK
— Worcester Warriors (@WorcsWarriors) March 20, 2020
LEICESTER TIGERS
Chairman Peter Tom provided an update on how Tigers will cope with the suspension of the Premiership. “The club’s business model is underpinned by strong commercial partnerships, but unprecedented circumstances mean that all revenue streams are being seriously affected and we need to make major decisions on how we address this significant deficit,” he outlined.
“The loss of income from ticket sales and other matchday activities costs the club a figure of between £300,000 and £400,000 per home game; taking lost revenues beyond £1million solely for this period in March-April when three home games have already been postponed.
“Faced with a situation where we cannot generate income from rugby activities while still having our own costs to meet, regrettably the board believes it is necessary to reduce both working hours and salaries by 25 per cent for all staff and players with effect from April 1.
“We will work closely to find solutions where this decision causes exceptional hardship for any staff member. The players and staff remain at the heart of the club and this is an extremely difficult decision to make, but it is felt this is the only appropriate course of action available to protect the current workforce and maintain the strength of our club for the longer term.”
?
Executive Chairman, Peter Tom CBE has issued a statement on behalf of the club, relating to Leicester Tigers operations during the Coronavirus situation.
See it here ?? https://t.co/Vac3GSZEtP
— Leicester Tigers (@LeicesterTigers) March 20, 2020
SARACENS
The defending champions, who accepted automatic relegation in January due to repeated salary cap breaches, issued a statement to clarify their current salary situation. “With the recent announcements that all rugby activity has been postponed and the cancellation of social gatherings and events for the foreseeable future, our club finds itself in a critical position.
“There will be a very significant drop in revenue and it is an unsustainable situation. We have asked all our players, coaches and staff across the whole organisation to support us in a reduction in salary by 25 per cent.
“This move is to protect as many jobs as possible and avoid redundancies. We will keep this situation under review at all times and we anticipate that the pay cut will last until fixtures are re-scheduled and revenue-generating activity can begin again in earnest. Our lower-paid staff have been protected from this pay cut.
“This decision has not been taken lightly by the board and as we understand it every rugby club across the country is feeling the same pain.”
Club Statement.#TogetherSaracens
— Saracens Rugby Club (@Saracens) March 20, 2020
BATH
CEO Tarquin McDonald explained that cuts haven’t yet been implemented but they are likely next week. “The impact of this pandemic clearly reaches well beyond our sport, and will have a lasting effect on every one of us,” he wrote in a letter to supporters.
“In line with the actions taken by other Premiership Clubs, we find ourselves having to make difficult decisions that can help safeguard the stability of our club and the game in these testing times.
“We are engaged in ongoing conversations with players and staff, and this will continue into the early part of next week. Tough choices will have to be made and actions taken. However, we are quite rightly focused on how we best look after our people and our players so that when we all emerge from this crisis, which we will.
An open letter from our Chief Executive, Tarquin McDonald
— Bath Rugby (@bathrugby) March 20, 2020
“In terms of our people, all of our playing, support and corporate staff are navigating uncharted waters as we adapt our training and working conditions to the latest government and sports governing body advice.
“All of our staff have been amazing in this respect and we have instigated home training programmes for players, with a skeleton staff now working at the Rec as most of our staff base themselves at home.
“As we settle onto the new routine of ‘coronavirus life’, rest assured we are reviewing new ways of working and how we can communicate and engage as we all work through these strange and unprecedented times.”
WATCH: Jim Hamilton is joined on The Lockdown by Ian McKinley to discuss the effects the coronavirus outbreak is having on the everyday life of a player living in Italy
Comments on RugbyPass
But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.
13 Go to commentsIt could be coincidental or prescient that the All Blacks most dominant period under Steve Hansen was when the Crusaders had their least successful period under Todd Blackadder and then the positions reversed when Razor took over the Crusaders.
13 Go to commentsDefinitely sound read everybodyexpects immediate results these days, I don't think any team would travel well at all having lost three of the most important game changers in the game,compiled with the massive injury list they are now carrying, good to see a different more in depth perspective of a coaches history.
3 Go to commentsSinckler is a really big loss for English rugby.
1 Go to commentsThanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
13 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
13 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
13 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
13 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to comments