Northern | US

World Rugby statement: Five Shape of the Game 2024 recommendations


New Zealand's Richie Mo'unga makes a catch in the 2003 Rugby World Cup final (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)
Comments
2 Comments

The latest World Rugby Shape of the Game forum in London has put forward five recommendations for 2024 – speed and flow, language and perception, the women’s game, player welfare and well-being, and disciplinary process review.

ADVERTISEMENT

The annual forum is an opportunity for the game’s major stakeholders to consider the future of rugby by increasing its relevance and accessibility through law and marketing recommendations to advance spectacle and fan engagement.

Its latest recommendations will now be considered by World Rugby’s executive board and council.

A statement read: “World Rugby’s Shape of the Game forum in London has agreed on recommendations to reimagine the spectacle and grow rugby’s share of attention within an increasingly competitive global sports and entertainment market.

Video Spacer

Pressure on Steve Borthwick’s England | Boks Office | RPTV

The Boks Office crew are back at Bishops in Cape Town to discuss all the latest goings on in the Six Nations, including England’s loss to Scotland. Watch the full show exclusively on RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

Video Spacer

Pressure on Steve Borthwick’s England | Boks Office | RPTV

The Boks Office crew are back at Bishops in Cape Town to discuss all the latest goings on in the Six Nations, including England’s loss to Scotland. Watch the full show exclusively on RugbyPass TV.

Watch now

“With the game embarking on a new era of certainty with the introduction of new men’s and women’s global calendars from 2026, including new competitions such as the Nations Championship, and expanded Rugby World Cups, leading figures across the sport are united in driving forwards the entertainment value of the game through fan experience, laws and regulations reform.

“While previous editions of the Shape of the Game forum delivered issue-specific short-term advancements, the 2024 edition is an important milestone in a new law review cycle and had a specific focus on a central mission of driving fan acquisition and retention by increasing relevance and accessibility.

“Playing, coaching, officiating, competitions and fan experts representing five specialist committees (men’s and women’s high performance, professional game, professional leagues and community rugby) were challenged to think big, think long-term and think collectively. Importantly, the groups were urged to view the game through a fan-focused lens.

“Framing the discussions was a detailed review of the latest men’s, women’s and community playing, officiating and welfare trends as well as feedback from technology and audience experts and fans.

ADVERTISEMENT

“In particular, delegates focused on addressing barriers to fan engagement – dead-ball time, the elements that interrupt the flow of the game, technology, the terminology and marketing of the sport as a whole.

“The group agreed on the following key action areas for World Rugby to explore in collaboration with key stakeholders before a detailed plan is presented to the federation’s executive board for consideration.”

Shape of the Game 2024 recommendations

    1. Speed and flow: Focus on aspects that keep the game flowing including speeding up the ‘use it’ call by referees at the breakdown, removing repeated scrums options, expanding the remit of the shot clock, a review of the offside law from kicks, and explore moves to provide the scrum-half with greater space and protection at the base of scrum, rucks and mauls.
    2. Language and presentation of the game: A renewed passion and urgency to focus on building rugby’s attention share via a fan-focused view of how the game is marketed, a consistent approach to the presentation of the sport across all media environments, and a focus on the moments in the game that really engage fans.
    3. Women’s game: A dedicated focus on the women’s game and adapting laws, recognising the unique characteristics, strengths and opportunities that exist to attract a new audience.
    4. Player welfare and well-being: A player-driven approach to advances in welfare, including removal of the ‘croc roll’ and examining the breakdown.
    5. Disciplinary process review: Streamlining the sport’s disciplinary and sanctioning processes to aid efficiency, consistency and fan understanding.

World Rugby chairman Bill Beaumont said: “Shape of the Game 2024 represents an important milestone in defining the future of our sport.

“It is born from a need and opportunity to grow rugby’s audience by considering how the on-field product and off-field experience can cement long-term growth within a new calendar that delivers long-term certainty of exciting content from expanded Rugby World Cups to new global competitions.

ADVERTISEMENT

“It is fantastic to see such a strong desire from all stakeholders – players, coaches, match officials, competition owners, unions and regions – to evolve the game to set us up for success, not just at the elite level, but at the community game. I would like to thank everyone for their forward-thinking and collaborative contributions.”

World Rugby chief executive Alan Gilpin added: “Rugby is in an attention economy. The attractiveness of the product in all its forms, combined with the excitement of the event experience, the content we create and stories we tell, is central to the sport’s growth as a whole.

“We will not look at actions or law tweaks in isolation, rather consider the changes we should make to definitively move the needle to make the game more relevant, attract new fans and deepen engagement with existing fans, and simplify the sport to make it more accessible.”

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

2 Comments
Load More Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

N
NoLongerARuck 1 hour ago
The Gallagher Prem may have become the new Super Rugby - and attack is here to stay

Comparing these two games is like comparing rotten apples with rotten oranges. Both are unpalatable, inedible and likely to make you sick. If I wanted to watch fast athletes leaping over obstacles I would watch the 200m hurdles at an IAAF event because static hurdles are what the Bath defenders seemed like against the Northampton backs. Northampton unleashed just 80 rucks for 19 line breaks. Bath barely made them work for 71 points. It was embarrassing with simple moves overloading the defence leading to simple scores and lets not talk about the missed tackles. The Saints defence wasnt as forgiving but it still looked like flat straight road with just a few tricky corners. The Prem is the new Super Rugby in terms of scores but not in terms of grit and substance. It has none of that and when these teams hit the Champs cup they meet true grit in the form of the French.

As for the Stormers vs Sharks I was doing meal prep and between chopping onions I shed a tear for the rugby being played out there. It was dreary with few rucks being built and pens, kicks, scrums and mauls being the order of the day. I turned on the tv to watch SFM, Damian Willemse, Giant Andre and nippy Edwill to name but a few but I got some one-dimensional dros served up in a typically rubbish South African derby. 63 kicks, 30 lineouts, 22 pens, 31 turnovers and ball in play of probably 25mins. Just 230 passes and 120 rucks between both sides, it was one out rugby to say the least. Imagine being asked to just make 81 tackles in a match and you still concede 39 points and miss 21 of them for less than 75%. It shows you how little the Stormers played and how poorly the Sharks defended. If you werent convinced by how little the Stormers played by that stat just look at the rucks built, 45 only, its like they played one half of rugby but thats actually a whole games worth for them.



...

5 Go to comments
N
NoLongerARuck 2 hours ago
Second-half Bledisloe capitulation lays bare Wallabies’ lack of bench depth

When they went into the break at 17-14 there was hope that they could win but as soon as that thought creeped in so did another that we have seen this script before and so a tight game became a blowout thanks in part to the bench woes the Wallabies have. This match also highlighted the obvious mental block Australia have when playing in NZ which is present too in Super Rugby. It is a horrible record built up through decades of suffering. Australia didnt help themselves in this game too. Defence was poor and a lack of contest at breakdown and ponderous line speed meant they just couldnt stop the black waves of attack. It was relentless from the All Blacks who showed their physicality, skill and grit which they have been honing in Rugbys Greatest Rivarly. They were battle hardened and ready for this test.

Australia didnt get any of the outcomes which they wanted off the high balls as well with the normally reliable JAS struggling. JAS struggled with his tackling as well and Potter and Henry were effectively cannon fodder for best centre in the world Jordie and his mercurial teammate Tupaea. Mcreight was also played out the game completely. Wilson was fantastic and the best player on the park with 28 tackles and no misses, a true captains knock. The lineout also went well and they must repeat the dose this weekend. The Wallabies must do better this week at home in several areas. If they can win this one it could be the catalyst for great things to come. This is probably the biggest test of the year for the Wallabies and a true test of their credentials for the showpiece next year.



...

7 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close