Weaponised maul has Gloucester fielding calls 'all over the world'
When it comes to the Gallagher Premiership, Opta provides a multitude of statistics that can take any rugby fan down a rabbit hole where hours will be happily spent mulling over the various numbers. Take mauling: League leaders Leicester top the charts for the most mauls (118) and most mauls won (100), but when it comes to effectiveness and end product, what George Skivington has achieved with his pack of Gloucester rolling maulers stands out as best in class.
Whereas Steve Borthwick’s Tigers have gained 229 metres from their mauls and scored nine tries off that particular facet of play, they are eclipsed by Gloucester where the Skivington-coached pack has registered 374 metres gained and scored an absurd 14 tries from its success in winning 91 of its 99 mauls.
To put this in context, defending champions Harlequins haven’t scored a single maul try all season in the Premiership. Instead of being hugely focused on their maul, their success in 59 of their 65 mauls has only secured them an 86-metre gain.
Harlequins, of course, have a swashbuckling reputation for strutting their stuff in other areas of the game, but the real surprise in the current statistics heading into round 14 of the Premiership this weekend is the numbers attributed to Exeter, a team whose pack have had a reputation over the years for its mauling.
Of their 52 mauls, just 40 have been won for a 63-metre gain and three tries. Eleven other teams have gained more metres off the maul than the Chiefs and seven other teams have scored more than them.
With Gloucester rising to fourth on the Premiership table and defeating Saracens in their most recent league match with a crucial 72nd-minute maul try from Lewis Ludlow, they have become of interest to the rugby world outside of England and Skivington has revealed he has been contacted by coaches from overseas in recent weeks that he has never spoken to before who are looking to learn the secret to his team’s mauling success.
His answer? There is no magic, just a whole load of repetitive hard work. “That was one of my main targets when I came in, to create a maul that would be dominant or more effective in all honesty because there wasn’t a maul culture at Gloucester, simple as that,” explained Skivington, who was appointed Gloucester boss in June 2020 after learning the coaching ropes as an assistant at London Irish.
“Last year the boys did a huge amount of work on it and I drove them a little bit mad with the amount of repetition. Then this year we do a fair bit of work on it but it is not an insane amount. The difference this year is the boys fully understand it. They probably don’t want to go back to last year doing the amount we did, that is probably why they are a bit sharper than they were.
“They are all pretty clear on what they have got to do but it’s more about being sharp on it really than long, long training. But yeah, if you re-lived last year I don’t know how many hours we would have done.
“Mauling is pretty simple, really,” continued Skivington, who is midway through his second full season in charge at Gloucester. “Your set-up has got to be good. If you spoke to every single forwards coach they would all say the same thing – you have got to have a firm base, you have got to be nice and tight. You have got to be working hard, not allow people to slip through the seams and break binds, bits and pieces like that.
“I honestly believe player buy-in is the key to it. Maybe I beat them into submission last year and they decided this year we are not doing that as much as we did last year so we are going to be good at it. The penny just drops and everyone is clear on what they are doing. There is no real magic formula.
“I have had a lot of people calling me and zooming me from all over the world actually wanting to talk mauling in the last few weeks. Some very interesting people, some people in different leagues that I have never spoken to. It’s great but there is nothing magic I can give them. It’s a very simple process and I have just got a good group of lads who really buy into it. They sort of own it and run it now which is good for me because they are enjoying it.”
What about the mechanics, though: does a player have a specific part to play or does he need to be adept at all aspects of a maul? “You have to be able to do every part of the mauling job because you have to keep teams guessing what you are going to do, what the lineout move is, where you are going to throw it.
“Otherwise inevitably it becomes not easy to stop but teams can set a plan around it so you have all got to be able to do the lifting role, get on the ball, fill the gaps, whatever names you put on all these things. Everyone has got to be able to do everything. It really does take one hundred per cent buy-in from all the players.”
Comments on RugbyPass
This is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
2 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
4 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to comments