Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Exeter tackle damning accusation about them and new drop-out rule

By Liam Heagney
(Photo by PA)

Rob Baxter has laid bare his exasperation that the new goal-line drop-out rule is a major reason why Exeter haven’t been as dominant as they were in recent campaigns. The Chiefs currently find themselves sixth on the Gallagher Premiership table, 18 points behind leaders Leicester following five defeats in a dozen matches. 

ADVERTISEMENT

They have also had their Champions Cup hopes dented by a defeat last month at Glasgow but director of rugby Baxter has insisted there is no truth whatsoever in the allegation that Exeter are suffering due to one particular law change introduced for the 2021/22 season. 

Whereas previously an attacking team that got held up over the try line without grounding the ball was given the put-in at a five-metre scrum to restart play, possession is now handed over to the defending team who are allowed to kick a drop-out from their goal line

Video Spacer

Francois Hougaard on Wasps beating Leicester and his memories of Bakkies Botha

Video Spacer

Francois Hougaard on Wasps beating Leicester and his memories of Bakkies Botha

The insinuation around the Premiership is that the attacking threat of Exeter has been blunted because of this rule change but Baxter was adamant that wasn’t the case. 

Instead of buying into the accusation, he outlined that the Chiefs’ problem wasn’t that they were getting held up over the line and surrendering possession. The issue was that they aren’t getting close enough to the line in the first place to be in a position to score tries.

Baxter has a point. Previously, the Exeter try tally regularly used to be one of the most envious in the league but they have only scored 35 tries in their dozen league outings so far, a strike rate eclipsed by six rival clubs while another opponent has that same number of five-pointers. “I said this at a members forum the other day and it raised a laugh because a lot of people keep talking about it as us being held up over the try line and it has caused a bit of an issue for us. 

“I actually said, ‘Well, it hasn’t caused a problem because we haven’t been getting over the line, you see what I mean?’ The goal-line drop is only an issue if you get held up over the try line – we haven’t been getting that far,” surmised Baxter, speaking ahead of Saturday’s Sandy Park rematch with Glasgow in Europe.   

ADVERTISEMENT

“I said this at the start of the season: If teams have to kick goal-line drop-outs because we keep getting over the try line and getting held up we will probably be winning the game by about 50 points. You don’t get over the try line loads of times and not get it grounded. Our biggest problem is we haven’t been getting over the try line. 

“Yes, there are elements of things we have tweaked but if anything I would say our biggest issue is trying to stay ahead of the game or to keep progressing and keep trying to score tries in different ways.

“Actually, some teams are very single-minded in how they score now. Gloucester is a perfect example. Gloucester and Leicester have very much got the best mauls in the Premiership now. They are single-minded and know what they are doing. No one is questioning them has the goal-line drop-out changed it because they have gone to a more focused driving game. This is what I am saying to you. 

“The goal-line drop-out itself, has it prevented Gloucester from having a successful maul? It hasn’t because they are doing it well. It wouldn’t prevent us from having a successful maul or a successful pick-and-go game if we were doing it well – we just have to do it better than we are doing it. The rule itself is not affecting us because we are having very few taken against us. We have actually hardly received any goal-line drop-outs.”

ADVERTISEMENT
ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

S
Shaylen 53 minutes ago
Jack Willis' Champions Cup masterclass proves English eligibility rules need a rethink

If France, Wales, England, Scotland and Ireland got together and all changed their eligibility laws in the same way SA has it would be absolutely bonkers. All players from all nations involved in Europe would be fair game as would their coaches. The investment in rugby would be supercharged as teams would rush to create dream teams. Transfer markets would be super charged, salary caps may change, private investment would grow as rich backers first buy clubs and then put money into their clubs in an effort to land the best players. The richest clubs and franchises would benefit most but money and players would move across borders at a steady flow. Suddenly countries like Wales and Scotland would have a much larger pool of players to select from who would be developed and improved in systems belonging to their rivals within superstar squads while their clubs receive large sums in the transfer market. The Six Nations would experience a big boost as the best players become available all the time. The Champions cup would become even more fiercely contested as the dream teams clash. Fan engagement would grow as fans would follow their favourite players creating interest in the game across the continent. Transfer markets and windows would become interesting events in themselves, speculation would drive it and rumours of big transfers and interest in players would spread. All of this is speculation and much of it would not eventuate straight away but just like in football the spread of players and talent would create these conditions over time. The transfer markets in European football is proof of this. Football had the same club vs country debate eons ago and favoured an open system. This has made it the largest game in the world with global interest and big money. Rugby needs to embrace this approach in the long run as well

12 Go to comments
J
Jon 6 hours ago
Waratahs 'counter-culture' limits Wallaby options for Joe Schmidt

This is a bit dramatic for me, I think the Rebels and Force cultures would be very strong, and if a player is chosen from either, you can be confident they are in a good head space and ready. Whether they quite have the technical or tactical foundations of the other two states is where one would way their risk of selection. I see no need for Schmidt to worry about that risk in this squad. The main reason I could see a predominance of players from Brumbies and Reds, is simple cohesion. What might the coaching group make of what’s lacking in the Tahs, and to a lesser extent Rebels and Force’s, franchise? Certainly sides (players) that are running irish plays like we saw from that lovely McDermott long ball with have a head start. I hope the players can continue it at International level. Really liked what I saw of Wright (don’t know player focus and just hadn’t seen a lot of him anyway) in that game, can see him being a glue in a Wallaby side too. A with the similar worry of selecting players like Ryan, I think it unfounded to worry so much about forward balance at the moment. Including both Wright and Skelton in the same lineout is not going to lose you games gainst Wales. Nor will any unknown weakenss Wales might find in Ryan be exploited to any great extent. It is the perfect time to introduce such a young player. What other shortcuts might Schmidt want to make now, just a year out from hosting BIL? When Gamble came on the scene I thought he had a Pocock ability to break game apart along with performing the role of a openside well. I would be very keen to drop Leota/Hooper for Gamble, and in your squad make up, include Uru as a lock. Did you forget to remove Vunivalu from your team? Would you have Meafou in your squad if you could?

114 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE How Leinster should learn from Dan Carter after toughest Champions Cup 'lesson' of all How Leinster should learn from Dan Carter after toughest Champions Cup 'lesson' of all
Search