Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Wales player ratings vs Uruguay

Hallom Amos dives for the line

Wales secured their spot at the top of the pool with a bonus point victory, although they made hard work of it during an error-riddled 80 minutes. Uruguay defended wave after wave of Welsh phases stoutly but, in the end, they couldn’t replicate their heroics against Fiji.

ADVERTISEMENT

In this mostly second-string team, a number of Welsh players were fighting to put their hands up for selection in the quarter-final. Did any manage it?

We rate the full squad below.

15. Leigh Halfpenny – 7

Missed an easy kick by his standards. He showed more intent in attack but was reliable rather than showing his old spark. Remains a class act in defence.

14. Josh Adams – 8

One of the few in this side to be a regular starter and it showed. Went looking for work in the first half and picked up a fifth try in four games during the second.

13. Owen Watkin – 6

Made some crucial defensive contributions and showed up in attack but not challenging for a spot unless injury prevents Parkes or Jonathan Davies from playing.

ADVERTISEMENT

12. Hadleigh Parkes – 5

Two tries were ruled out because his final pass was forward. This game needed him to show some composure and he didn’t deliver. Could probably have done with a rest.

11. Hallam Amos – 6

Denied a hat-trick of tries, twice because Parkes’ assisting pass was forward, once because of his own poor handling. Seemed before this match to be the most likely to fight his way into the 23 but probably didn’t do enough, although he worked hard.

ADVERTISEMENT

10. Rhys Patchell – 6

Didn’t have the composure in the first half that he showed in his previous outings but grew into the game more. Lovely long pass towards the end but Wales fans will hope Dan Biggar is fit.

9. Aled Davies – 5

Looked too slow for the pace Wales were trying to play at. Steady but not thrilling.

1. Nicky Smith – 6

Picked up a try but didn’t shine. May be under pressure for his spot, especially after he gave away a cheap turnover.

2. Ryan Elias – 6

Carried well but unlikely to have done enough to dislodge Dee as the reserve hooker.

3. Dillon Lewis – 5
As one of only two tightheads, he’s not under pressure for his spot but his performance didn’t inspire.

4. Bradley Davies – 7

His one-handed break early on was a surprise even to him, it seemed. Carried hard and straight when Wales needed it.

5. Adam Beard – 6

Not too shabby for a player who had his appendix out before arriving in Japan. His mauling defence might see him sneak ahead of Davies for a bench spot.

6. Aaron Shingler – 6

Tried to get involved everywhere and had a try ruled out but didn’t do enough to challenge for a starting spot. A little too keen to offload.

7. Justin Tipuric (capt) – 7

Couldn’t drag this second-string side together as captain. From a playing perspective, he was as involved as always. Withdrawn early, presumably with an eye on the France game.

8. Aaron Wainwright – 8

Looked comfortable at No8, mixing up some straight lines with clever footwork. Another early withdrawal, he seems likely to start against France, although more likely on the blindside.

Replacements
Elliot Dee – 6

Earned a penalty try not long after coming on.

Rhys Carré – 7

Played fast and loose with the offside line in defence but a lovely break towards the end showed why Gatland likes him. Will his carrying be enough?

Wyn Jones – 6

Played on the tighthead; not his usual spot. Didn’t let anyone down.

Jake Ball – 7

Steady showing again. Always works so hard and happy to do the dirty stuff.

Ross Moriarty – 7

Managed to get in a fight before he even got on the pitch. Showed intent once he got there but might have to settle for the bench next week.

James Davies – 6

Made a try-saving tackle and he’ll question the penalty he incurred.

Tomos Williams – 7

Sped things up a bit, which was needed. Deserved his try.

Gareth Davies – 7

Given a run-out on the wing because of Wales’ lack of fit backs. Didn’t look entirely comfortable there and his solo try at the end was classic scrumhalf opportunism.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 3 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

This is the problem with conservative mindsets and phycology, and homogenous sports, everybody wants to be the same, use the i-win template. Athlete wise everyone has to have muscles and work at the gym to make themselves more likely to hold on that one tackle. Do those players even wonder if they are now more likely to be tackled by that player as a result of there “work”? Really though, too many questions, Jake. Is it better Jake? Yes, because you still have that rugby of ole that you talk about. Is it at the highest International level anymore? No, but you go to your club or checkout your representative side and still engage with that ‘beautiful game’. Could you also have a bit of that at the top if coaches encouraged there team to play and incentivized players like Damian McKenzie and Ange Capuozzo? Of course we could. Sadly Rugby doesn’t, or didn’t, really know what direction to go when professionalism came. Things like the state of northern pitches didn’t help. Over the last two or three decades I feel like I’ve been fortunate to have all that Jake wants. There was International quality Super Rugby to adore, then the next level below I could watch club mates, pulling 9 to 5s, take on the countries best in representative rugby. Rugby played with flair and not too much riding on the consequences. It was beautiful. That largely still exists today, but with the world of rugby not quite getting things right, the picture is now being painted in NZ that that level of rugby is not required in the “pathway” to Super Rugby or All Black rugby. You might wonder if NZR is right and the pathway shouldn’t include the ‘amateur’, but let me tell you, even though the NPC might be made up of people still having to pull 9-5s, we know these people still have dreams to get out of that, and aren’t likely to give them. They will be lost. That will put a real strain on the concept of whether “visceral thrill, derring-do and joyful abandon” type rugby will remain under the professional level here in NZ. I think at some point that can be eroded as well. If only wanting the best athlete’s at the top level wasn’t enough to lose that, shutting off the next group, or level, or rugby players from easy access to express and showcase themselves certainly will. That all comes back around to the same question of professionalism in rugby and whether it got things right, and rugby is better now. Maybe the answer is turning into a “no”?

35 Go to comments
j
john 5 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

But here in Australia we were told Penney was another gun kiwi coach, for the Tahs…….and yet again it turned out the kiwi coach was completely useless. Another con job on Australian rugby. As was Robbie Deans, as was Dave Rennie. Both coaches dumped from NZ and promoted to Australia as our saviour. And the Tahs lap them up knowing they are second rate and knowing that under pressure when their short comings are exposed in Australia as well, that they will fall in below the largest most powerful province and choose second rate Tah players to save their jobs. As they do and exactly as Joe Schmidt will do. Gauranteed. Schmidt was dumped by NZ too. That’s why he went overseas. That why kiwi coaches take jobs in Australia, to try and prove they are not as bad as NZ thought they were. Then when they get found out they try and ingratiate themselves to NZ again by dragging Australian teams down with ridiculous selections and game plans. NZ rugby’s biggest problem is that it can’t yet transition from MCaw Cheatism. They just don’t know how to try and win on your merits. It is still always a contest to see how much cheating you can get away with. Without a cheating genius like McCaw, they are struggling. This I think is why my wise old mate in NZ thinks Robertson will struggle. The Crusaders are the nursery of McCaw Cheatism. Sean Fitzpatrick was probably the father of it. Robertson doesn’t know anything else but other countries have worked it out.

25 Go to comments
A
Adrian 7 hours ago
Will the Crusaders' decline spark a slow death for New Zealand rugby?

Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause

25 Go to comments
T
Trevor 10 hours ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Juan Ignacio Brex: 'Italy made history, but it's not enough' Juan Ignacio Brex: 'Italy made history, but it's not enough'
Search