There are lots of stories like Rob Horne's that people don’t hear about – Andy Goode
Australians don’t normally get a warm welcome at Twickenham but Rob Horne is guaranteed one on Saturday and, while he deserves all the support he gets, hopefully it will also raise awareness of the mental, physical and financial help other players need when they’re forced to retire.
He was Northampton’s top try scorer of the season going into that game and was captaining the team for the first time but his life changed forever 13 seconds into the match when he chased the kick-off and went to make a routine tackle, the type he’d made over 100 times that season alone.
He thought he had dislocated his shoulder but all five nerves in his right arm were detached from his spinal cord and he will not regain feeling in his right arm. In an instant, his career and the way he has always known to provide for his family has been taken away from him.
He is adapting to the new realities of his life and doing a Masters degree in commerce as he starts to forge a new career but very few people can comprehend the fate that has befallen him apart from him and his family.
Saints have been great in moving this game to Twickenham and donating the proceeds to support Rob but the whole rugby community has rallied round. I was up at the opening of Matt Hampson’s Get Busy Living Centre the other day and there’s no better example of how the rugby family supports each other in times of hardship.
It’s the most horrible reminder of the brutality of professional sport and players know the risks they’re taking every time they step onto the field but what’s happened to Rob really brings it home to them.
Rob was just coming to the end of his first year of a three-year deal at Saints so it’s great to see that they’re supporting him so well but a one-off injury has not only ended his career five or six years early but it has changed the course of his life completely.
So, hopefully the support he’s getting at the moment continues and it raises awareness of the help other players need when they stop playing as well.
Primarily, that is help with mental health and adjusting to a new way of life but there are real financial implications for players that this incident raises as well as the physical help that’s required.
If you’re injured for 26 weeks cumulatively in a 52-week cycle, a club can terminate your contract there and then. I don’t think there have been too many cases of that happening but it shows the fragility of life as a professional rugby player.
The Rugby Players’ Association (RPA) provides a certain level of insurance with its membership and that’s fantastic but it only covers you to a relatively low level compared to what a lot of players in the Premiership are earning nowadays.
So, as a player you have to take out extra insurance on top of that and that is incredibly expensive. We’re not talking a few hundred quid like car insurance. To cover your own contract will cost tens of thousands of pounds.
And, they won’t cover the injuries or knocks and niggles that you’ve had previously, which doesn’t leave many areas that are covered if you’re a rugby player!
The RPA do a brilliant job with what they do and the cover players get through them is far and above what they’d get if they tried to put their membership fee towards it but it isn’t enough for a lot of players.
I did it myself in my early thirties and for £100,000 worth of cover I was getting quotes of over £10,000 per year without covering my knee, which was f***ed.
I had degenerative cartilage issues purely because of rugby but that wasn’t covered because it was a pre-existing injury so I’ve had to have several major operations on it since retiring and I’ve had to do it all off my own back.
I’ve had to have a clear-out of my knee, a major operation on my knee and another operation on my ankle as well in the past year or so.
You can have all these operations through the club and their top level medical support and connections when you’re a player but as soon as you retire, that’s gone.
I had a long career and was very lucky and I know that and all of the other ex-players I know have medical issues as a result of playing rugby but they wouldn’t change their careers so we know it’s a part of being a professional rugby player.
I look back on my career and one of my favourite ever games was Wasps’ first game at the Ricoh Arena against London Irish. Personally, it was a great game for me and my family, being from Coventry and breaking the record for most points in a game but it’s tinged with sadness.
Within that game, Chris Bell, who was a quality club player and played for Sale, Leeds, Harlequins and Wasps, damaged the nerves in his shoulder. He never played rugby again and retired a few months later and that was from an innocuous tackle like the one Rob Horne made in April.
He didn’t sever the nerves to the extent that he suffered paralysis but it wasn’t far off and there are lots of stories that people don’t hear about so if the high-profile nature of this game for Rob can raise awareness of the help that others need as well, that’d be a real bonus.
I remember being a 19-year-old kid at training at Leicester and the older boys telling me that I’ll have done well if I’m still in the game at 30 and that was in 1999. That statement rings even more true now and it’s becoming a lot more common for players to retire in their mid-twenties.
If you run into a brick wall at two miles per hour, there won’t be that much damage but there will be a lot more when you increase that speed and there will be more of these impact injuries as the physicality, speed and intensity of the game and the players increases.
Sam Jones is another prime example. He was at Wasps but goes on international duty and snaps his leg while doing some two versus one wrestling. He’s gone from being in the England squad and probably being set to win his first cap in the autumn internationals to never playing rugby again.
I don’t know how much support he’s received from the RFU as a result but that’s the issue that this game at Twickenham in aid of Rob Horne should bring to the forefront of people’s minds.
It’s a chance to reflect on how precious a rugby career is and how it can be taken away in an instant and to consider whether the game is doing enough in general to help players when they’re forced to stop playing because it’s mental support that’s needed as well as physical and financial assistance.
Continue reading below…
Rob will be delivering the match ball on Saturday and it’s going to be an emotionally charged atmosphere and that could give Northampton an edge. You saw the impact that Doddie Weir delivering the match ball had last autumn when Scotland nearly beat the All Blacks.
However, Leicester will be talking about harnessing the emotion in the stadium and making it work in their favour. They’ll also pay their respect to Rob by playing as hard as they possibly can and trying to get the victory because he was a fierce competitor and that’s the right way to respect him.
It’s amazing that Rob is getting this support and it’ll be a great occasion on Saturday but there’s no doubt that there will be other players thinking that they didn’t get the support they’d hoped for from their club when they got injured and had to end their careers.
Rob’s injury hasn’t prompted calls to change the game but it should make people consider whether unions, clubs and other stakeholders are doing enough, on top of what the RPA do, to help players or whether more can be done.
Comments on RugbyPass
Thanks Nick The loss of players to OS, injury and retirement is certainly not helping the Crusaders. Ditto the coach. IMO Penny is there to hold the fort and cop the flak until new players and a new coach come through,…and that's understood and accepted by Penny and the Crusaders hierarchy. I think though that what is happening with the Crusaders is an indicator of what is happening with the other NZ SRP teams…..and the other SRP teams for that matter. Not enough money. The money has come via the SR competition and it’s not there anymore. It's in France, Japan and England. Unless or until something is done to make SR more SELLABLE to the NZ/Australia Rugby market AND the world rugby market the $s to keep both the very best players and the next rung down won't be there. They will play away from NZ more and more. I think though that NZ will continue to produce the players and the coaches of sufficient strength for NZ to have the capacity to stay at the top. Whether they do stay at the top as an international team will depend upon whether the money flowing to SRP is somehow restored, or NZ teams play in the Japan comp, or NZ opts to pick from anywhere. As a follower of many sports I’d have to say that the organisation and promotion of Super Rugby has been for the last 20 years closest to the worst I’ve ever seen. This hasn't necessarily been caused by NZ, but it’s happened. Perhaps it can be fixed, perhaps not. The Crusaders are I think a symptom of this, not the cause
9 Go to commentsNo way. If you are trying to picture New Zealand rugby with an All Blacks mindset, there have been two factors instrumental to the decline of NZ rugby to date. Those are the horror that the Blues have become and, probably more so, the fixture that the Crusaders became. I don’t think it was healthy to have one team so dominant for so long, both for lack of proper representation of players from outside that environment and on the over reliance on players from within it. If you are another international side, like Ireland for example, sure. You can copy paste something succinct from one level to the next and experience a huge increase in standards, but ultimately you will not be maximizing it, which is what you need to perform to the level the ABs do. Added to that is the apathy that develops in the whole game as a result of one sides dominance. NZ, Super, and Championship rugby should all experience a boom as a result of things balancing out. That said, there is a lot of bad news happening in NZ rugby recently, and I’m not sure the game can be handled well enough here to postpone the always-there feeling of inevitable decline of rugby.
9 Go to commentsNo SA supporter miss Super Rugby - a product that is experiencing significant head wind in ANZ - the competition from rival codes are intense, match attendance figures are at a historical low and the negativity of commentators such as Kirwan and Wilson have accelerated the downward spiral in NZ. After the next RWC in 2027 sponsors will follow Qantas and start leaving in droves.
2 Go to commentsLike others, I am not seeing the connection between this edition of the Crusaders and the All Blacks future prospects under Razor. I think the analysis of the Crusaders attack recently is helpful because Razor and his coaching team used to be able to slot new guys in to their systems and see them succeed. Several of Razor’s coaches are still there so it would be surprising if the current attack and set piece has been overhauled to a great extent - but based on that analysis, it may have been. Whether it is too many new guys due to injuries or retirement or a failure of current Crusaders systems is the main question to be answered imo. It doesn’t seem relevant for the ABs.
9 Go to commentsharry potter is set in stone. he creates stability and finishes well. exactly what schmidt likes. he’s the ben smith of australian rugby. i think it could quite easily be potter toole and kellaway for the foreseeable future.
5 Go to commentsThis is short sighted from Clayton if you ask me, smacks of too much preseason planning and no adaptability. What if DMac is out for a must win match, are they still only going to bring their best first five and playmaker on late in the game? Trusting the game to someone who wasn’t even part of planning (they would have had Trask pinned in as Jacomb preseason). Perhaps if the Crusaders were better they would not have done this, but either way imo you take this opportunity to play a guy you might need starting in a final rather than having their 12th game getting comfortable coming off the bench.
1 Go to commentsThanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.
21 Go to commentsWhat a load of bollocks. The author has forgotten to mention the fact that the Crusaders have a huge injury toll with top world class players out. Not to mention the fact that they are obviously in a transition period. No this will not spark a slow death for NZ rugby, but it does mean there will be a new Super Rugby champion. Anyone who knows anything about NZ rugby knows that there is some serious talent here, it just isn’t all at the Crusaders.
9 Go to commentsI wouldn’t spend the time on Nawaqanitawase! No point in having him filling in a jersey when he’s committed to leave Union. Give the jersey to a young prospect who will be here in the future.
5 Go to commentsIt was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
7 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
2 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
2 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to comments