Northern Edition

Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Townsend unfazed by the risk of making Russell Scotland captain

(Photo By Ramsey Cardy/Sportsfile via Getty Images)

Scotland head coach Gregor Townsend believes Finn Russell will “thrive” on the responsibility of leading his country despite the added burden of captaincy on his playmaker-in-chief.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Bath fly-half, 31, is already in charge of the Scots’ attack and is the second most experienced member of Townsend’s Six Nations squad with 75 caps, only behind lock Richie Gray.

With uncertainty over the fitness of co-captain Rory Darge, who said he was “aiming for one of the first two games” as he recovers from a knee injury, Russell is most likely to lead Scotland out at Cardiff’s Principality Stadium for their opening fixture against Wales on 3 February.

He was handed the armband for the first time last summer for a World Cup warm-up Test against France at Murrayfield, guiding the Scots to a 25-21 comeback victory from 21-3 down.

Video Spacer

Finn Russell discusses THAT big tackle on Cameron Woki

Video Spacer

Finn Russell discusses THAT big tackle on Cameron Woki

While admitting concern about Russell’s workload was “definitely a factor” in his decision-making process, Townsend said the fly-half’s previous captaincy stint convinced him it would not be an issue.

“Captaincy is something that can help you grow further as a player and a leader, and you can thrive on that,” he said. “But there is the other side too, the responsibility of things like today (media commitments) and talking to the players more. Could it potentially change how you play?

“Now, having spoken to Finn in the week before he was captain in the summer against France, he wasn’t going to change how he would lead the team – because he is a key leader for us in meetings and training sessions and in the 80 minutes on the field in games.

Fixture
Six Nations
Wales
26 - 27
Full-time
Scotland
All Stats and Data

“On reflection, he really thrived that week with the other elements of captaincy but also in the game – as Rory did the week before when we played Italy. So yes, it is a consideration but we have confidence that this will add another layer to their performances.”

The chances of Glasgow flanker Darge featuring against Wales, or France in Scotland’s second game at Murrayfield on 10 February, will be reassessed early next week as he steps up his rehabilitation from a strained knee ligament.

ADVERTISEMENT

“When I get back into camp I will get tested by the physios and they will see how my progress is going,” he said. “Then hopefully I can start integrating into team training and running and things like that. It is very much seeing how the knee reacts to progressing my rehab and taking it from there.”

Darge’s availability or otherwise could also affect whether Jamie Ritchie features in the match-day 23 against Wales, having been stripped of the captaincy and told to focus on competing with the likes of Luke Crosbie, Matt Fagerson, Andy Christie and Josh Bayliss for a back-row spot.

“He has reacted really well,” Townsend said of his former skipper. “We have been communicating for a few weeks now around his game and also the captaincy. He was well aware we were going to leave this decision until the weekend.

“The focus for him is about getting into the team to play Wales and he is really determined to do that. That will be tough because the competition we have in the back row right now is of a high level. We are all optimistic that will bring the best out of Jamie, and Jamie can be one of our best players, back at his top level where we are all hoping will be now.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We saw on Friday night when he came on for Edinburgh against Scarlets, there was a real hunger and intent about how he went about his game. It is going to bring the best out of him, we believe, and the ability to just focus on that in training leading into the Wales game should be a positive.”

Townsend also revealed that Darcy Graham’s quad injury – sustained playing for Edinburgh against Gloucester on 13 January – is “more significant” than originally hoped, with the wing ruled out of Scotland’s first two games at least.

“We are hopeful he will be available for round three (against England on 24 February) but that will just depend how he reacts over the next couple of weeks when he starts rehab again.”

Related

ADVERTISEMENT

LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

M
Mzilikazi 2 hours ago
Western Force and ACT Brumbies looking for signs of progress in Super Rugby Pacific

It’s good to be at the start of the season, to be tipping the games again. Thanks for the article Brett. An interesting and, for me, informative read, as I have not kept up with all the news of all the teams, really only Qld.


Whatever happens in the search for a new coach for the WB’s, all of Les Kiss, Stephen Larkham and Dan McKellar will be coaching their respective teams this year. I believe Kiss to be the best of the three, and by a significant margin(the bad result against the Chiefs in the playoffs last season the one scar), and that gives Qld., in my view, an extra edge.


I agree, Brett, that Qld. on paper, and on squad strength and experience, look the best bet for Australia. If Tim Ryan builds on last year, he could be a WB starter against the Lions. The locking strength and depth is approaching that of teams like Leinster, Toulouse etc…not as strong ofc, but in Super Rugby circles, yes.


I like the type of game Kiss is building. Really carrying on from where he was rudely interrupted at London Irish, when they fell over. The one game on tour where they beat Ulster was a significant pointer to where they are at. While not a top Ulster unit, it was still a very good team, not easy to beat in Belfast. Sadly the Bristol game was a training run, but still valuable in a way, as the group were touring, building systems and understanding.


One player I will be watching with interest is Finn Hurley at the Highlanders. He was brought to my attention a year ago by the grandson of a friend, who knew him at Otago Boys High in Dunedin. Small, but resilient, with a good boot, from what I have seen on clips, he should have a useful first full year as a Highlander.


Hope the Force do well… have always had a “soft spot” for them. But good luck to all franchises, and pray for no serious injuries….as I have done forever, as aplayer, then coach, and now long retired rugby fanatic 😀

2 Go to comments
J
Jfp123 4 hours ago
New twist sees Romain Ntamack's Six Nations ban extended

I’m still not convinced. I think everyone should be punished equally for similar actions, rather than differentiating punishment on the basis of speculative psychological analysis. I still think accusations are based more on the mindset of the accuser than the accused. As mentioned, I can’t possibly say why Ntamack committed foul play and you may be right, but that’s not the only possible explanation. Have you never lost concentration when work’s a walkover and your best efforts aren’t needed. We know very little about Ntamack, perhaps major upheavals off the pitch were on his mind, eg maybe worried about the baby. Or how about turning your speculation in the opposite direction? Some pundits mentioned there were afters to the tackle, which presumably indicate the Welsh player had lost his temper. Were those afters delivered silently, or were they accompanied by words? Could he have said something insulting about Ntamack’s mixed heritage, or family, or something else that lit the blue touch paper? I don’t suppose he was complimenting him on his hair! No provocation justifies dangerous play, whether an HIA examination is required or not, and Ntamack deserved his red card and punishment. But if this is what happened, would you call both players’ losses of temper ‘malicious’? After all, Ntamack has taken thousands of big hits over his career without retaliating. The foul was out of character, so should it be explained away by afters to the tackle that were malicious? No one landed a punch, but are all punches malicious, whatever the provocation? Now both this scenario and yours take actions which actually happened, and then progress to pure speculation about the unknown. There are other possibilities too. I’m certainly not saying any of the possibilities discussed are what happened and I don’t presume to know what the players were thinking at the time. If you want to make a case for punishing all players who get a red card, in a similar way with similar outcomes, for longer, that would be fair enough. But I don’t think it’s fair to call for special punishment for a particular player based on speculation.

7 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ From an uncertain position, Barrett and McKenzie are the All Blacks' key playmakers From an uncertain position, Barrett and McKenzie are the All Blacks' key playmakers
Search