Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

The notion that the Springboks are the world's best is nothing more than an illusion at this point

(Photos/Gettys Images)

You would think the Springboks had been the best team in the world for the last 10 years with the way the rhetoric has been since their World Cup victory two years ago.

ADVERTISEMENT

A model of consistency, a team that wins at home and away by resounding scores over their top rivals, cementing themselves as historical greats with an extended period of dominance.

The World Cup victory was well-deserved, albeit aided by fortune. After losing to the All Blacks in the pool stages to secure a quarterfinal against first-time finalists Japan, they beat an injury-riddled Wales by three points to make the final.

Video Spacer

The crazy reaction to the Lions squad announcement | RugbyPass Fan Zone

Video Spacer

The crazy reaction to the Lions squad announcement | RugbyPass Fan Zone

The demolition over England was their crowning achievement of that campaign. At the right time, at the right moment, they toppled Eddie Jones’ men to take the William Webb Ellis trophy.

You play the hand that is dealt and that is what tournament rugby offers. The Springboks took full advantage. It is by no means the full body of work that earns the right to be called the best team indefinitely.

They are rightfully World Cup holders, but this era of Springboks rugby hasn’t proven to the world they are anything but a good side who won the World Cup with a helpful schedule.

The first world champions to lose a game in the World Cup tournament and win it, after about a year of playing well. The last calendar year with a full slate of games against tier one opposition in 2018, the side finished with a 50 percent win rate.

ADVERTISEMENT

The other title they won in 2019 does little to bolster their world-beating claims.

They took their first Rugby Championship title in 10 years in a truncated version as they drew with New Zealand, beat Michael Cheika’s downtrodden Wallabies and defeated Los Pumas. It was an easy layup when everyone’s focus was on Japan.

It was a title that they were unprepared to defend in 2020 back on a full schedule, backing out of the competition while perennial underdogs Argentina fronted up with nothing but slim hope amid chaos.

Los Pumas, a squad ravaged by COVID-19 and forced to spend months away from family in the lead-up to the competition, achieved a slice of greatness by pulling off a historic win over the All Blacks against all odds.

The challenge was enormous and the odds of success looked low, but they took on the challenge anyway like a fearless competitor. Where were the world champion Springboks when the lowly Pumas could front with no games since the Jaguares last played?

ADVERTISEMENT

Were they worried the shine of their world champion status would have rubbed off with a pasting at the hands of the All Blacks? Or worse, a loss to the Wallabies in Australia, where the Springboks have a horrendous record over the last 20 years?

As it were, the All Blacks were not anywhere near their potential in 2020 and the Springboks missed a golden opportunity to put one or two over them and bolster the standing of this era’s legacy.

After all, we’ve only seen one win over New Zealand from four attempts during Rassie Erasmus’ reign as head coach.

Their administrators were thinking preservation, not on how to further their World Cup win and cement a historic period for Springboks rugby.

Yes, the hurdle was high to jump over, but they decided not to try. Sadly, that decision was a little weak that showed fearful thinking – hardly that of a champion mindset when you compare what Argentina overcame.

The Springboks have ducked competition and hid since winning the World Cup, trying to prop up an illusion that this side is the best team in the world instead of making that a reality with a bold 2020 campaign.

A Rugby Championship title win, away from home, would have this side on the path to becoming one of the all-time great Bok teams. Instead, they dodged the opportunity in the interests of preservation.

You could argue the Springboks’ preparations for the Lions tour are as bad, or even worse, as that of what was asked in 2020 for the Rugby Championship, yet there is little chance we see them pull out due to concerns over player welfare in test rugby this time.

The problems are now compounding for the Springboks as they’ve had hurdle after hurdle to jump over to try and prepare for test rugby, with talks of warm-up tests being an inter-squad hit out. It is not an envious position to be in.

The rugby world is watching, waiting for this so-called best team on the planet to front up. They’ve had the rankings frozen for them to try and preserve that aura that only exists in their own mind around holding the number one ranking.

Frankly, there wouldn’t be a top five international team that believes the Springboks are the best team in the world. They are a good team that got their act together after being clapped for a good two years by everyone from here to Timbuktu.

Heavy defeats to New Zealand – 57-0 in Albany and 57-15 in Durban – were followed by a 38-3 roasting by Ireland in November 2017.

Italy, a team that hasn’t won a Six Nations game since 2015, even notched a maiden win over the Springboks the beforehand.

Granted, that is in the past. They got their act together and became one of the top teams, played unrelenting defence, scrapped and fought their way back.

But it would be folly to say there is a gap between them and everyone else. We haven’t seen it yet. We haven’t seen them dominate for any period of extended time.

The rest of the pack would love the chance to play these world champions. The Lions are the team that have that assignment, and have already seen tougher under Gatland.

The 2017 All Blacks – coming off back-to-back World Cup wins, undefeated at home in eight years since 2009, boasting a 90 percent win rate – were the most formidable opponent you could ask for. Undisputedly, the best team in the world without a rival.

The Lions fronted up, drew the series and ended a 47-game home winning streak after being down 1-0 after the first test.

The Springboks lost at home just three games ago, haven’t played in two years, won’t have any crowds and have a host of key players racing the clock to be fit.

If you could pick between the 2017 All Blacks and 2021 Springboks as touring opponents, you would take the 2021 Springboks every day of the week.

That’s not to say it will be a walk in the park by any means, but if you think the experienced Lions players haven’t had tougher opponents, you are kidding yourself.

Quell the talk of a Springboks whitewash – just win the series. That will be enough to add some merit to being the world’s best, but that is just the first building block.

Win away from home with regularity against Australia and New Zealand and add a couple of real Rugby Championship titles to the trophy case.

Go to Europe on an end-of-year tour and sweep everyone. Put together a solid two-or-three-year stretch as a dominant team.

Prove your mettle, and then the rugby world will give you credit as the world’s best. Earn a place in history with prolonged success rather than a questionable flash-in-the-pan World Cup win and then hiding away for two years while everyone else got on with it.

The real test as the world’s best has yet to begin – playing as world champions, as the hunted rather than the hunter. Deal with building depth, injuries, form drops, bad games and still being able to win and maintain success.

Right now, South Africa are the World Cup holders who beat up England on the right day.

It was an inspirational moment and wonderful occasion for their country. They have basked in that glory for as long as you could have asked. But the world’s best team isn’t one that last played in 2019. Time doesn’t stand still for anyone.

And we will soon find out whether this illusion is real or not.

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
JW 49 minutes ago
Three former All Blacks assess the playing style adopted against France

Yep Wilson at least does a lot of such research but I think it’s only when it revolves around the All Blacks etc, like he go and find out why Ireland whipped our butt etc, and come back with a view we need to imrpove and do x y z like such and such is.


But none of them are individuals that are a) any sort of quality coach/analyst of the game (NPC the highest), or b) seem to consume stupids amount of rugby for the love of it like people in a similar profession in other top leagues. Johnson is probably the only one I would say comes close to that but is a pure fan, I don’t think he has any pro knowledge.


To be fair to them, the best in say soccer or american football would get paid a hundred times what these guys do, but it’s so hard in those markets that all panelists have to be students of the game just to get a shot. And in the case of Beaver, he is like the Ian Smith of cricket, he’s a knowledgable gu, enough to lead people down the wrong track (they would believe him), but they’re both very obvious in their more parochial opinions that you know to take what Beavers saying with a grain of salt. Wilson, Marshall, and even Mils go off like they think theyre the bees knees,


Admittedly things are changing globably, i’ve glimpsed enough football shows to know the Britsih media are happy, and the fans too soaking it up, getting the most high profile ex players on a show as the best way to increase ratings.

13 Go to comments
J
JW 1 hour ago
Beauden Barrett weighs in on controversial yellow card

It’s an interesting question because a normal diberate knock on is just a penalty offense, an normal infringement like any other, so that’s deemed where the was not a reasonable chance to catch the ball.


But it’s a ruling that can also be upgraded to a foul, and by association, a yellow card, when it’s it was also deliberately trying to deny the ball to another player. For instance, that is why they are just given penalties up the field, because the player has just made a bad decision (one where he had no reasonable chance) and he doesn’t really care if the pass had gone to hand for his opponents or not (he was just thinking about being a hero etc).


So the way the refs have been asked to apply the law is to basically just determine whether there was an overlap (and not to try and guess what the player was actually thinking) or not, as to whether it’s a penalty or a YC.


This is the part Barrett doesn’t like, he’s essentially saying “but I had no idea whether they were likely to score or not (whether there was an unmarked man), so how can you tell me I was deliberately trying to prevent it going to someone, it could have been a blind pass to no one”.


It’s WR trying to make it clear cut for fans and refs, if at the players expense.

But yes, also you must think it entirely possible given both were foul plays that they could both go to the bench. Much the same as we see regularly when even though the play scores a try, they have started sending the player off still.


And while I agree Narawa didn’t knock it on, I think the ball did go forward, just off the shoulder. As his hands were up in the air, above the ball, basically like a basketball hope over his right shoulder, I guess you’re right in that if it did make contact with his hands it would have had to be deflected backwards onto his shoulder etc. Looking at the replay, Le Garrec clearly lost control of the ball forward too, but because Barrett was deemed to have committed a deliberate act, that overrides the knockon from 9.


I just don’t understand how they can consider it a deliberate attempt to block a pass when he actually lost the ball forward!

46 Go to comments
LONG READ
LONG READ Maua Letiu: 'Dad was a stay-at-home dad, Mum worked in a chicken factory - they didn't sit and complain' Maua Letiu: 'Dad was a stay-at-home dad, Mum worked in a chicken factory - they didn't sit and complain'