The backstory of how Mark Jones' Wales nearly shocked New Zealand
It’s extraordinary what a bit of clear and effective re-organisation can quickly achieve. Just a few months ago Wales had been rendered winless in the Six Nations U20s, enduring 17- and 16-point home losses to Ireland and England as well as getting hammered on the road by a 50-point margin in France after tight affairs versus Scotland and Italy escaped them by one and four points.
The wooden spoon campaign resulted in Byron Hayward resigning as the lead pathway coach and into the breach on May 11 as an interim head coach came Mark Jones, the ex-Test winger whose return to Worcester after successfully assisting at the Super Rugby Crusaders came a cropper when the Warriors fell into administration last September.
Forty-five days on from his appointment, Jones remarkably got the misfiring Wales to within a whisker of ambushing New Zealand. A 19-5 interval lead in Paarl on Saturday had rekindled memories of the famed 9-6 surprise that had taken place just down the road in Stellenbosch 11 years ago, the Welsh class of 2012 spectacularly ending New Zealand’s 21-match unbeaten run in the tournament.
However, whereas Wales were able to withstand a Baby Blacks onslaught in the deluge that fell at the Danie Craven Stadium all those years ago, the dry conditions in Paarl allowed New Zealand to move the ball when it mattered, and they eventually clinched a 27-26 comeback win. There were plenty of plaudits due Jones’ way for the defiant way Wales had played but he was having none of it in the aftermath.
“I haven’t done anything,” he insisted to RugbyPass about his few short weeks with the Wales squad. “What I have done is align the group, given the guys a clear purpose and a training plan that replicates what we are trying to produce – and the players are putting the effort in and have brought it alive.
“It’s like a diet: unless you adhere to it, it is not going to do you any good. I have got to give all credit to the staff and the players. I also have got to send a message that we shouldn’t be happy that we have lost by a point. We should be disappointed, but we have to use it as fuel for our next games.”
That will happen on Thursday when they take on Japan in Stellenbosch, and Jones will be looking to see more of what inspiringly unfolded against New Zealand. Asked what he said to his team at the interval in Paarl after they had secured a deserved 14-point lead, he said: “My message was to stick to the plan.
“We came up with a pretty clear game plan and other than the first seven or eight minutes of the first half, we nailed it and it was working effectively for us and the scoreboard reflected that. We talked about a few areas of improvement second half. We felt that we could get more line speed off our set-piece, we were missing the jump a little bit off their lineout.
“But really we spoke just about continuing what we were doing well: let’s be really dominant at the maul, let’s get field position through it and then let’s use our backs when we shorten up the defensive line. To be fair to the All Blacks, they challenged us physically around our defensive game.
“We gave a few soft penalties away, we didn’t get a restart right from conceding a try and we conceded two quick back-to-back tries which shifted the scoreboard but also shifted the momentum and by the time the boys had worked out how to get momentum back, it was a little bit late. Proud of the way the guys responded and adapted. We have taken two points from the game, and we can also take a lot of positives.”
The biggest encouragement was how Wales stayed in the fight even though New Zealand threatened like they could run away with it having moved 27-19 ahead. “The last 20 minutes of the game was a real focus for us based on the Six Nations,” explained Jones. “It’s an area that dropped off tactically and physically for us.
“We put a lot of time into that and ironically we looked stronger at the end of each half. That is a real improvement, and these players will get a lot of confidence from that when we go in to play our future games, that we can go for the full 80. The key learning for us is tactically getting the big moments right, especially when the scoreboard is in the balance.
“The whole team stood out,” he added. “I thought the front five were tremendous around the maul and setting the maul. I thought our half-backs were excellent at pulling the trigger when the opportunities were on to take points with the boot or through handling. And I thought defensively our back row was tenacious and fought for everything, so there was a real full house of a team performance.
“But we have to park this performance now. There is a lot of learnings to take out from it both positive and work-ons, but it should give the whole squad optimism around our next game. The challenge is, can we repeat it? There is the challenge for the group, can we do it back-to-back?”
Comments on RugbyPass
Good player but far from being best in the world. That's an exaggeration. Perhaps Best in world by Northern Hemisphere standards and biasis but certainly not Southern Hemi standards
3 Go to commentsWell one thing about World Cup knock out rounds and Ireland is very clear: they won’t be getting ahead of themselves in ‘27! Because making it beyond the QF is well and truly ‘IN THEIR HEADS’ now…😉
54 Go to commentsHas this guy been dope tested? Sounds like a case of “roid rage”.
1 Go to commentsI would like to see him say that to Eben face to face in a dark alley.
54 Go to commentsYep, lost in translation. There are arrogant people in Ireland, yes. There are arrogant people in every country, but as a nation, arrogance is not a general characteristic. I seriously doubt that was said or meant by 12 or 13 players. Whoever said it, would have been paying Etzebeth and the Springboks a compliment for how hard fought the game was.
54 Go to commentsOne of the few Bidwell articles I can agree with. If coaches played their players through niggles and consistently played them 80mins then you could make an argument for resting protocols - they obviously don’t and are incredibly responsible, let’s give up the resting nonsense and let the boys play.
2 Go to commentsDaniel Gallan, please for the love of all that is holy, stop writing about rugby. Or at the very least stop telling people you are South African.
21 Go to commentsThis Dr.Rassie 6-2 filth is spreading. We need to ask World Rugby to ban something
1 Go to commentsPity he couldn’t call him a liar to his face, such a brave man.
54 Go to comments“You ain’t counting to 12 or 13 straight after a game, son!” Just because you don’t doesn’t mean everyone else doesn’t “I reckon if anyone said it they would have said, ‘Hopefully, see you in the final’.” Oh, you “reckon”, do you? You weren’t there, you weren’t part of the conversation but you know what was said… Id10T
54 Go to commentsNZ has such a rich history of quality number nines, and woman beaters.
1 Go to commentsThat’s what happens when you are scared of scrums
2 Go to commentsWhats interesting now is the evolution of rugby. More and more the laws are favouring the team in possession and the ball carrier. Teams can keep the ball for longer periods more than ever before with little risk and wear down defences as long as they don’t knock it on. Set pieces are seen as hindrances and as time wasting annoyances by law makers and they are being depowered as lawmakers strive for higher ball in play time. Perhaps its only natural then that teams will take a more assertive and aggressive approach in defence. An offensive defence as you said Nick. This may force errors and turnovers and help teams to break up attacking plays while providing counterattacking prospects. Perhaps we will see more and more teams adopt the blitz in the next 4 year cycle and beyond much like Gegenpress has met Tiki Taka in football. Instead of Pep and Klopp we will have Farrell and Nienaber.
25 Go to commentsArrogant entitled prick with a huge chip on its shoulder
5 Go to commentsApparently the only ppl Scotland can beat are their spouses…thank you / good night!
6 Go to commentsSo….who is Andy Goode?
54 Go to commentsEngland had to bed in their new defensive system while challenging for the 6N. The schedule allowed them to try and focus on defense for first 3 matches and then target Ireland (the pre tournament target match). A win in France would be a bonus.
1 Go to commentsJust from watching the highlights there was plenty to like and plenty to build on. Some of these boys will be Super players soon and they will benefit from the exposure. Sounds like the coaches have made a good connection with these young men.
3 Go to commentsDont know if the Irish players said it or not, but lets all be honest with ourselves, and hopefully both the Irish and French have healed by now, the Media did jump the gun, be realistic, according to 90% of the media it was a France and Ireland final, and the media had 1 of them winning the world cup, not even mentioning the All blacks? Just remember world cups are different, Australia was not the most in form cricket tean in the last cricket world cup, but they have a nack of winning when it matters. I wont go into whether what Etzabeth is saying is true, all I am saying is that its very easy for a team to get ahead of themselves due to the media. Nothing wrong with it, the media got the springboks over confident against England and we nearly lost that one.
54 Go to commentsHey Finn, Well done to the Junior Wallabies…a win is a win but it was a wet and scrappy game. Would be interesting to hear your opinion on two things from watching the game at the Not So Sunny Coast Stadium. Firstly, what is your opinion on the rule change of being able to call The Mark from a kick off and what is the reason for the change? Secondly, your thoughts on the lack of action for the high tackle on the SA fullback. I understand the TMO ruled that he had fallen into the tackle and the tackler didn’t have time to adjust but it was clearly shoulder on head and the Aussie 11 had not made any attempt to adjust his tackle height leading into the tackle. In my opinion he was never going to get his tackle technique correct to complete a safe tackle. If that tackle was made at a more senior and more scrutinised level would we have seen the same result?
2 Go to comments