Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Telling decision suggests Sharks are braced for long Eben Etzebeth ban

Eben Etzebeth of South Africa, who was sent off for eye gauging on Alex Mann looks on after the Quilter Nations Series 2025 rugby international match between Wales and South Africa at Principality Stadium on November 29, 2025 in Cardiff, Wales. (Photo by David Rogers/Getty Images)

The Sharks have deregistered South Africa lock Eben Etzebeth from their Investec Champions Cup squad ahead of their new campaign.

ADVERTISEMENT

Etzebeth is currently awaiting the verdict from an independent disciplinary hearing after receiving a red card against Wales on Saturday in a 73-0 at Cardiff’s Principality Stadium.

The 34-year-old attended a hearing on Tuesday charged with gouging Wales flanker Alex Mann, but the rugby world is still waiting for the verdict from the panel, with reports suggesting they are in the process of agreeing a suitable sanction.

VIDEO

It was highly unlikely that the Sharks were going to select Etzebeth, or any Springboks, this weekend for their trip to France to take on European giants Toulouse on Sunday, given their gruelling Test schedule over the past month. However, the decision to deregister the 141-cap veteran suggests they are bracing for a lengthy ban.

The lowest entry point for a top-end offence like gouging is a 12-week ban, which could potentially be halved due to Etzebeth’s disciplinary record and any mitigating factors. Therefore, the best case scenario for the lock, albeit unlikely, is roughly a six-week ban – something that would prove to be quite controversial.

Fixture
Investec Champions Cup
Toulouse
56 - 19
Full-time
Sharks
All Stats and Data

Even if Etzebeth were handed a six-week ban, that would still rule him out of the opening four rounds of the Champions Cup for the Sharks.

Following their contest with Toulouse at the weekend, the Sharks host three-time champions Saracens next week, before clashes with Sale Sharks and ASM Clermont-Auvergne in January. Etzebeth will almost certainly be prohibited from playing in those matches, which explains his club’s decision. Any longer ban could see him ruled out of the campaign entirely.

ADVERTISEMENT

Etzebeth is not the only Springbok that has been deregistered, as World Rugby player of the year nominee Ox Nche has also missed out due to the leg injury he sustained against Japan at the beginning of November.

Related


To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

c
cw 17 minutes ago
Jeff Wilson: 'They didn't play with a great deal of confidence'

Agree Robertson failed badly. But you don’t give him enough credit for the reformation he was undertaking. Perhaps it was a Crusader plan - but why is that a negative - he won 7 Super Championships with it - it would be surprising if he did not look to build a team around a plan that had that level of success. But it was in any event directed to meeting a hard fact - ABs had fallen well behind the power and intensity of SA and France, and latterly England. For too long the ABs had become over reliant on a smash and grab all of game counter attack. By stark contrast Robertson was focused on building structured power game where he could rely on set piece dominance and synchronised attacking structures. At one level it produced a remarkable statistic - 87 % of tries scored from set piece and within the red zone. Of course the negative flip side is the almost total absence of counter attack. But perhaps more importantly Razor was visibly reshaping the forwards - he could now assemble a starting and impact pack to rival the gargantuan packs of SA and France for the full 80 minutes involving among other things a three lock second row strategy with Vaa’i and Holland playing 6 when fit that when deployed never went backwards including against the Boks and 6-2 French impact packs. His greatest failure in my view is that he was too conservative and did not fully implement this structured power game and go 6-2 especially against the English who had already mastered what NB has called “periodising” - the art of maximising intensity at key times. The loss against them was highly predictable because of it. But it is simply wrong to say that Razor did not innovate - he did but as you say lacked the confidence or ability to get his team to fully implement. Razor also clearly had the insight that if he did not build the Black Crusaders the ABs were are serious risk of free fall. A stark statistic in this regard is that the tier one team with the bigger combined start and impact packs measured by collective weight and height won all games against other tier one teams last year including the ABs v SA at Eden Park, the Boks in Wellington, Paris and Dublin and the English in London. Finally, Razor this year achieved the best win % improvement of all tier one teams last except England (and they did not play the Boks) and the ABs was the only tier one team to beat the Boks. So yeah he deserves some some credit.

PS I am not a Crusader fan and looking forward to Joseph taking over.



...

6 Go to comments
Close
ADVERTISEMENT