Northern | US

Rugby union's latest civil war set to involve England, France and money - reports


Wales' Alun Wyn Jones is tackled by England's Manu Tuilagi during last month's Guinness Six Nations match in Cardiff (Photo by Dan Mullan/Getty Images)
Comments
Comment

The Le Crunch duo of England and France have always felt they hold the whip hand when it comes it rugby in Europe. They were in the vanguard when the old ERC European Cup was disbanded in 2014 in favour of the EPCR Champions Cup, and now they are sabre-rattling again, demanding more of a financial share-out from the Six Nations to buy the support of their all-powerful clubs.  

ADVERTISEMENT

According to a report in the Wednesday edition of the UK Guardian newspaper, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Italy have been left to question the real value of offers from four investment companies for a minority shareholder stake in the Six Nations. 

Upwards of 27% equity would be given up in the business, allowing the successful bidder take over the commercial arm of the tournament and likely spelling the end of the Six Nations being exclusively shown on free-to-air TV in the half-dozen participating countries.

The demand by England and France for a greater share of potential revenue for their clubs has created unease in the other four countries as they are concerned it would potentially leave them more vulnerable when trying to hold onto their best players in a market where better salaries are generally available in the Premiership and Top 14.

The Guardian claimed that the Rugby Football Union was called on at a recent meeting to show some leadership due to Premiership Rugby becoming increasingly bullish after its equity deal with CVC.

(Continue reading below…)

Video Spacer

Apparently, the RFU has been considering contingency plans should it fail to reach agreement with its clubs over the international calendar. One alternative would even see newly formed English regional teams entering the PRO14 with players centrally contracted.

As it stands, Ireland, Scotland, Wales and Italy would allegedly gain more financially from World Rugby’s plan to set up a Nations Championship from 2022.

ADVERTISEMENT

However, the sticking point here is that Ireland, Scotland and Italy oppose the insistence on relegation being introduced to the Six Nations and to the Rugby Championship even though it could take the form of a play-off and a parachute payment would be made.

World Rugby met the leading unions, together with Fiji and Japan, in Dublin last week and initially gave them two weeks to sign a due diligence agreement. That deadline has since been put back until 5 April. Under the plan there would be no involvement of private investment companies and the Six Nations would remain on free-to-air television.

Video Spacer

Get the RugbyPass App 📱

Follow the biggest matches with live scores, line-ups, news and analysis, all in the RugbyPass App.

Download Here
On Apple IOS, Android, and Tablet.
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

P
Phantom 35 minutes ago
Nations Championship: 'The data shows the north has finally caught up with the south'

Fact: the gap between the North and the South has narrowed considerably - that I get. However, determining that only selecting only Home grown players or playing in the home country is is the optimal strategy is a bit of a toss up and highly reliant on the economies of the home union. I do understand that England and to a lesser degree Ireland selects home based only. The top 14 is a massive threat to their domestic product. France would probably not be affected (the money is at home). Fiji, Argentina, Samoa, Italy and you could even argue Scotland have only benefitted from this. Their players either go overseas to learn at higher levels (Fiji, Samoa, Argentina) or players coming into their leagues to strengthen the home product and their National teams (Scotland, Italy, Japan).

South Africa used to limit its selection to the home based players, but the reality of a weak currency vs what players could earn oversees meant that you lost access to your best players at some stage of their careers, with very few exceptions. Kolbe left SA as he was considered too small for International Rugby (yes coaches/selectors view), but ironically in France he forced selectors to notice his endeavors and select him. He is only reaching 50 caps now despite being north of 30 - granted rotation and the odd injury also played a role, but for the most part it is having debuted or becoming a regular so late.



...

14 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Close
ADVERTISEMENT
Copied to clipboard

Share Article close