Northern | US

Time for World Rugby to make an example of a big name referee?


Angus Gardner and Rhys Ruddock
Comments
Comment

It now seems strange to recall rugby union without yellow and red cards, but until the late 1990’s the referee was armed solely with a whistle and, in extremis, the option to send off a serious miscreant.

ADVERTISEMENT

In those long-forgotten days, a player being despatched for an early bath was something of a rarity. Rucking was vigorous, a nose-to-nose punch-up was just part of the game and a high tackle had to border on decapitation before it drew more than a penalty and a word with the captain.

As time has moved on, the use of the sin-bin has become very much part and parcel of the referee’s game management tool kit. But as World Rugby struggles to get its Japan 19 match officials to follow the pre-World Cup tackle directives, it seems apposite to question if referees view the red card in the same matter-of-fact way.

The newly-issued three-stage directions for assessing whether a high tackle or shoulder charge merits punishment, and at what level, should be simple for players to understand and equally straightforward for officials to apply.

However, even with the assistance of the touch judges and a TMO armed with multiple camera angles and slo-mo devices, time and again the first dozen World Cup matches have seen errors made.

Video Spacer

The citings of Australian winger Reece Hodge and England centre Piers Francis underline this, Samoa could – and probably should – have played 50 minutes against Russia with 13 players, while the officials’ response to a number of other illegal challenges have fallen some distance below World Rugby’s new high-water line.

The world’s best officials are clearly struggling to get to grips with the new directive, and it seems that a cultural change in how the red card is viewed is urgently required.

ADVERTISEMENT

Although none are old enough to have officiated in the pre-card days, most officials have a deep-seated reluctance to issue a red, perhaps because of its likely significance on the outcome of the match.

The sentiment that a red card is reserved for something really heinous is ingrained in rugby culture. Two yellows is a different story – but rugby has never used red cards with the frequency football does.

To officials who prize man-management and communication skills, it may even be that giving a red card is subliminally seen as some kind of failure.

Until this barrier is overcome, World Rugby will not get the progress it seeks, and with the business end of the World Cup almost upon us, it is essential that we get conformity and consistency in this area.

ADVERTISEMENT

Based on the most recent round of games, the ‘mea culpa’ World Rugby issued a week into the tournament in respect of its officials’ performance level has not had the desired effect. Might more drastic action – for instance the de-selection of an established big-name official – therefore drive the required change?

Ireland manager Joe Schmidt and captain Rory Best react after their side lost in a dramatic game against hosts Japan in the Rugby World Cup.

Video Spacer
ADVERTISEMENT
Play Video
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

0 Comments
Be the first to comment...

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Long Reads

Comments on RugbyPass

G
GrahamVF 3 hours ago
Jake White renews calls for Springboks to be forced to play from home

Absolutely agree H. Some of our best coaches are overseas getting paid decent wages. Johan van Graan and Franco Smith the two most high profile but there are others Shaun Sowerby and Hein Adams both at Bordeaux. It can only be money. I don’t think the current top four coaches are up to the same standard as some of the South Africans coaching overseas. My experience in coaching is that there are three year natural cycles, Year one - re-alignment. Bringing in the new ideas anc coaching prioroties. Very often the first season is punctuated by losses trying to adapt form the old to the new ways. Year two the team gels around the new ways and beginning to achieve near their potential. Year three the peak of the new methods. But this is the year when inevitable the form of good players begins to attract offers from greener pastures and key players leave with the inevitable decline in results. It happened to me when I coached Kloof Senior Primary when we beat some very established teams like Cordwalles Highbury and WP Prep, Hugh Reece Edwards was rugby director at Westville and four of my key players left for bursaries there with the inevitable fall in results. It happened again when I was manager of the Hillcrest Villagers - after gaining entry to the premier competition when we beat teams like Harlequins complete with Vleis Visagie and Robert du Preez - low and behold that HR Edwards then became coach of Crusaders and would you believe it - four of our key players went there at the end of the season together with three or four others who retired, and of course we were relegated.

So - the fact that Rassie has managed to hang on players and develop others to fill the inevitable gaps and the fact that he has a wide spread of ideas besides his own I think is key to the continued - and long may it continue - success of the Boks. Our retreads are useful to fill gaps until others develop and also to act as player/mentor/coach such as Os du Rand and Frans Steyn so the mix is good but you can’t rely solely on those players like The Sharks do. I think mostly the others are getting there. Hope so.



...

16 Go to comments
Close Panel
Close Panel

Edition & Time Zone

{{current.name}}
Set time zone automatically
{{selectedTimezoneTitle}} (auto)
Choose a different time zone
Close Panel

Editions

Close Panel

Change Time Zone

Copied to clipboard

Share Article close