Northern Edition
Select Edition
Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
New Zealand New Zealand
France France

Report: Rugby World Cup final venue for 2027 decided as host cities named

A general view during the 2020 Tri-Nations and Bledisloe Cup match between the Australian Wallabies and the New Zealand All Blacks at ANZ Stadium on October 31, 2020 in Sydney, Australia. (Photo by Brett Hemmings/Getty Images)

Sydney and NSW will play a key role in the men’s 2027 Rugby World Cup as they have won the right to host the men’s 2027 Rugby World Cup final according to media reports.

ADVERTISEMENT

World Rugby and Rugby Australia officials announced the host cities Thursday with the Rugby World Cup final reportedly returning to Sydney’s Accor Stadium according to The Age, the site of England’s famous win more than 20 years ago in 2003.

Reports indicate Sydney beat out interest from WA and Optus Stadium and Victoria and the MCG as potential Rugby World Cup final venues.

The famous Melbourne Cricket Ground is likely to host two quarter-final games, while Brisbane’s Suncorp Stadium is the other contending venue. Both of cities will also host a high number of pool games.

Canberra has missed out altogether on hosting matches, with Newcastle, Adelaide and Townsville named as other host cities.

Optus Stadium in Perth was considered for the knock-out stages but given the distance required to travel back and forth from the east coast, it was decided that it would negatively impact the teams playing there. Perth will host the opening pool game featuring the Wallabies.

ADVERTISEMENT

The World Cup will also be moved from its usual September-October window to start on October 1 and finish on November 13 to avoid clashing with the end of the NRL and AFL seasons, as requested by Rugby Australia.

 


To be first in line for Rugby World Cup 2027 Australia tickets, register your interest here 

ADVERTISEMENT
LIVE

{{item.title}}

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

1 Comment
J
JJB 140 days ago

Disappointed Perth only gets the opening match.

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Tom 1 hour ago
Has 'narrow-mindedness' cost Ribbans and others their Lions chance?

I didn't say anything regarding whether I feel the eligibility rule is right or wrong, you've jumped to conclusions there…


The fact is the eligibility rule does exist and any English qualified player is aware when they sign a foreign contract that they're making themselves ineligible and less likely to be picked for the Lions. If Jack Willis and Dave Ribbans priority was playing for England and the Lions they wouldn't be playing in France. Whether they should be allowed to play for England or not isn't my point. Under the current rules they have chosen to make themselves ineligible so they can't have their cake and eat it while other players have taken lesser salaries to commit themselves to their dream of playing for England and the Lions. They have made their choices.


Besides, while it works for South Africa doesn't prove it will work for any other country. South Africa have an extraordinary talent pool of incredible rugby athletes which no other country can compete with. They sadly don't have the resources to keep hold of them so they've been forced into this system. If they had the wealth to keep all their players at home and were still playing in Super Rugby they might be even better… they could be worse. We can't know for sure but cherry picking the best country in the world with a sample size of 1 and extrapolating it to other nations with very different circumstances doesn't hold water. Again, not saying the eligibility rule is correct just that you can't assume scrapping it would benefit us simply because South Africa are world champions.

17 Go to comments
I
IkeaBoy 1 hour ago
How Leinster bullied the Bulls at Croke Park

Expert coaches exist across the land and the IRFU already funds plenty. Ulster own their academy and who owns Ulster?


If you go to school in the North and rugby/tag rugby isn’t even on the PE curriculum until 12/13 as opposed to 7 or 8 in Leinster, how is that the IRFU’s fault? Even then, it’s only certain schools in the North that will offer it. On what basis would they go up to the North (strictly speaking, another country in the eyes of some) and dictate their schools programme?


The ABs used to be light years ahead of the pack because their eventual test superstars had been playing structured, competitive rugby from an average age of 5/6! On top of kicking it around the yard from the age they could walk with their rugby mad parents and older siblings.


Have you somehow gotten the impression that the Leinster system is not working for Irish rugby? What is that based on? The SARU should just stop competing because despite their back to back RWC’s, all 4 of their URC teams aren’t contesting semi-finals every year?


A couple of mining towns basically provided a Welsh team in the 70’s that were unplayable. Queensland in the old Super 10 provided the spine of an Oz team that were the first to win multiple world cups and in the same decade. The ABs population density is well documented with 35% of the population living around one city.


Is England’s match day 23 equally represented by mid-counties players, tough as nails northerners, a couple from Cornwall, a pack of manc’s and a lone Geordie? Ever?

It’s cute they won’t relegate the Falcons but has a Geordie test player ever hit 50 caps?


It’s ok not to understand geography. It’s also ok not to understand sport. Not understanding the geography of sport is something different entirely.

266 Go to comments
TRENDING
TRENDING Chiefs name 10 All Blacks in starting XV for Super Rugby Pacific final Chiefs name Super Rugby Pacific final team
Search