Reds take Chiefs outside their comfort zone only to lose it late on
The Queensland Reds outscored the Chiefs by three tries to two but still lost 29-20 in Hamilton, Damian McKenzie’s perfect boot denying the Australians a slice of history in their Super Rugby Pacific quarter-final.
Suliasi Vunivalu scored twice in arguably his best outing of the season for the Reds while Harry Wilson complemented his efforts with a try too.
But an opportunistic Chiefs’ try after the half-time siren and a perfect seven kicks at goal from their No10 McKenzie proved critical as the hosts triumphed in Hamilton on Saturday.
It ensured the top-ranked side avoided becoming the first New Zealand team to lose on home soil to an Australian side in a Super Rugby play-off game.
The Chiefs had lost just once all season, but that blemish came against the Reds last month in a monumental New Plymouth boilover that was their first win across the ditch in 10 years.
The match winner for the @ChiefsRugby ?#CHIvRED #SuperRugbyPacific #WelcomeToYourSuperStage pic.twitter.com/25X9Ka64ip
— Super Rugby Pacific (@SuperRugby) June 10, 2023
The Reds (5-9) limped into the play-offs in eighth, but looked the part in a patient, tactical performance that took the Chiefs outside their comfort zone for 73 minutes. That was when big loose forward Pita Gus Sowakula rolled over under the posts to seal the win for the hosts.
Before that, the Reds pushed and prodded the favourites in a cagey effort featuring plenty of back-and-forth long kicks. Willing to back their defence, the Reds put several big hits on Chiefs playmaker McKenzie and through re-built No13 Filipo Daugunu forced errors.
The Reds turned over a scrum on their own line, Josh Flook nailing a 50-22 kick on the run that lead to Vunivalu’s try off a James O’Connor cut-out pass.
Tom Lynagh missed the conversion and then an easier penalty kick from another crunching Daugunu tackle, the Chiefs edging ahead courtesy of McKenzie’s accurate boot. He kicked three straight three-pointers before Wilson timed his pluck from the ruck just right to roll over for the Reds’ second try.
Again, Lynagh missed the conversion but they threatened again when the Reds’ depleted pack won another penalty against the competition’s best scrum.
But their usually-reliable lineout let them down, the Chiefs hitting top gear to score after the half-time siren through Emoni Narawa and snatch a 14-10 lead.
Daugunu went off with a shoulder injury to begin the second half but the Reds kept at it, Vunivalu grabbing the ball from the ruck and skipping to complete his try double.
Lynagh, who had kicked a long-range penalty then managed a superb 50-22 of his own, nailed the conversion to put the Reds ahead before a McKenzie penalty swung it again.
A Flook try-saving tackle helped the Reds win a penalty on their line but there would be no fairytale as the Chiefs scored last and departing Reds coach Brad Thorn was forced to sign off with a brave loss.
Comments on RugbyPass
It was a pleasure to watch those guys playing with such confidence. That trio can all be infuriating for different reasons and I can see why Jones might have decided against them. No way to justify leaving Ikitau out though. Jorgensen and him were both scheduled to return at the same time. Only one of them plays for Randwick and has a dad who is great mates with the national coach though.
53 Go to commentsBrayden Iose and Peter Lakai are very exciting Super Rugby players but are too short and too light to ever be a Test 8 vs South Africa, France, Ireland, and England, Lakai could potentially be a Test player at 7 if he is allowed to focus on 7 for Hurricanes.
5 Go to commentsPencils “Thomas du Toit” into possible 2027 Bok squad.
1 Go to commentsDon’t see why Harrison makes the bench. Jones can play at 10 if needed, and there is a good case for starting her there to begin with if testing combinations. That would leave room for Sing on the bench
1 Go to commentsWhat a load of old bull!
1 Go to commentsOf the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.
29 Go to commentsIrish Rugby CEO be texting Andy Farrell “Andy, i found our next Kiwi Irishman”
5 Go to commentsI certainly don’t miss drinking beers at 8am in the morning watching rugby games being played in NZ.
1 Go to commentsThis looks like a damage limitation exercise for Wales, keeping back some of their more effective players for the last 20/25 minutes to try and counter England’s fresh legs so the Red Roses don’t rack up a big score.
1 Go to commentsVery unlikely the Bulls will beat Leinster in Dublin. It would be different in Pretoria.
1 Go to commentsI think it is a dangerous path to go down to ban a player for the same period that a player they injured takes to recover. Players would be afraid to tackle anyone. I once tackled my best friend at school in a practice match and sprained his ankle. I paid for it by having to play fly-half instead of full-back for the rest of that season’s fixtures.
5 Go to commentsJust such a genuine good bloke…and probably the best all round player in his generation. Good guys do come first sometimes and he handled the W.Cup loss with great attitude.
2 Go to commentsWord in France is that he’s on the radar of a few Top14 clubs.
5 Go to commentsGet blocking Travis, this guy has styles and he’s gonna make a swift impact…!
1 Go to commentsWhat remorse? She claimed that her dangerous tackle wasn’t worthy of a red! She should be compensating the injured player for loss of earnings at the minimum. Her ban should include the recovery time of the injured player as well as the paltry 3 match ban.
5 Go to commentsArdie is a legend. Finished and klaar. Two things: “Yeah, yeah, I have had a few conversations with Razor just around feedback on my game and what I am doing well, what I need to improve on or work-ons. It’s kind of been minimal, mate, but it’s all that I need over here in terms of how to be better, how to get better and what I am doing well.” I hope he’s downplaying it - and that it’s not that “minimal”. The amount of communication and behind the scenes preparation the Bok coaches put into players - Rassie and co would be all over Ardie and being clear on what is expected of him. This stands out for me as something teams should really be looking at in terms of the boks success from a coaching point of view. And was surprised by the comment - “minimal”. In terms of the “debate” around Ireland and South Africa. Nice one Ardie. Indeed. There’s no debate.
2 Go to commentsThere’s a bit of depth there but realistically Australian players have a long way to go to now catch up. The game is moving on fast and Australia are falling behind. Australian sides still don’t priories the breakdown like they should, it’s a non-negotiable if you want to compete on the international stage. That goes for forwards and backs. The Australian team could have a back row that could make a difference but the problem is they don’t have a tight five that can do the business. Tupou is limited in defence, overweight and unfit and the locks are a long way from international standard. Frost is soft and Salakai-Loto is too small so that means they need a Valentini at 8 who has to do the hard graft so limits the effectiveness of the backrow. Schmidt really needs to get a hard working, tough tight 5 if he wants to get this team firing.
3 Go to commentsSorry Morgan you must have been the “go to for a quote” ex player this week. Its rnd 6 and there is plenty of time to cement a starting 15 and finishing 8 so I have no such concerns.
2 Go to commentsGreat read. I wish you had done this article on the ROAR.
2 Go to commentsThe current AB coaching team is basically the Crusaders so it smacks of wanting their familiar leaders around. This is not a good look for the future of the ABs or the younger players in Super working their way up the player ladder. Razor is touted as innovative, forward looking but his early moves look like insecurity and insular, provincial thinking. He is the AB's coach not the Golden Oldies.
10 Go to comments