Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Pumas' Pablo Matera a doubt for rest of World Cup

By Ian Cameron
Pablo Matera of Argentina receives medical treatment to an injury during the Rugby World Cup France 2023 match between Japan and Argentina at Stade de la Beaujoire on October 08, 2023 in Nantes, France. (Photo by Phil Walter/Getty Images)

The further participation of Pablo Matera in the Rugby World Cup hangs in the balance as the flanker faces uncertainty following a suspected hamstring injury sustained during their match against Japan in Nantes.

ADVERTISEMENT

Matera was forced to leave the field just 23 minutes into the crucial Pool D encounter against the Brave Blossoms, casting doubt on his further participation in the tournament, should Los Pumas advance.

The Argentine team is locked in a fierce battle with Japan for the coveted second-place spot in Pool D, a position that secures a spot in the quarterfinals. The loss of their influential forward could deal a severe blow to Argentina’s aspirations.

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show – IRE v SCO

Watch the Big Jim Show Live on Saturday before and after the Ireland v Scotland game, Live & Free only on Rugbypass TV

Watch Here

Video Spacer

The Big Jim Show – IRE v SCO

Watch the Big Jim Show Live on Saturday before and after the Ireland v Scotland game, Live & Free only on Rugbypass TV

Watch Here

Matera, who has been a key figure for the Pumas, will undergo a medical assessment to determine the extent of his injury and the feasibility of his return.

Matera returned to the sideline shortly after where he was picked up by the match day cameras.

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 11

Chasing The Sun | Series 1 Episode 1

Abbie Ward: A Bump in the Road

Pacific Four Series 2024 | Canada vs USA

Japan Rugby League One | Verblitz v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Fresh Starts | Episode 2 | Sam Whitelock

Royal Navy Men v Royal Air Force Men | Full Match Replay

Royal Navy Women v Royal Air Force Women | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

J
Jon 4 hours ago
The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific

I have heard it asked if RA is essentially one of the part owners and I suppose therefor should be on the other side of these two parties. If they purchased the rebels and guaranteed them, and are responsible enough they incur Rebels penalties, where is this line drawn? Seems rough to have to pay a penalty for something were your involvement sees you on the side of the conned party, the creditors. If the Rebels directors themselves have given the club their money, 6mil worth right, why aren’t they also listed as sitting with RA and the Tax office? And the legal threat was either way, new Rebels or defunct, I can’t see how RA assume the threat was less likely enough to warrant comment about it in this article. Surely RA ignore that and only worry about whether they can defend it or not, which they have reported as being comfortable with. So in effect wouldn’t it be more accurate to say there is no further legal threat (or worry) in denying the deal. Unless the directors have reneged on that. > Returns of a Japanese team or even Argentinean side, the Jaguares, were said to be on the cards, as were the ideas of standing up brand new teams in Hawaii or even Los Angeles – crazy ideas that seemingly forgot the time zone issues often cited as a turn-off for viewers when the competition contained teams from South Africa. Those timezones are great for SR and are what will probably be needed to unlock its future (cant see it remaining without _atleast _help from Aus), day games here are night games on the West Coast of america, were potential viewers triple, win win. With one of the best and easiest ways to unlock that being to play games or a host a team there. Less good the further across Aus you get though. Jaguares wouldn’t be the same Jaguares, but I still would think it’s better having them than keeping the Rebels. The other options aren’t really realistic 25’ options, no. From reading this authors last article I think if the new board can get the investment they seem to be confident in, you keeping them simply for the amount of money they’ll be investing in the game. Then ditch them later if they’re not good enough without such a high budget. Use them to get Jaguares reintergration stronger, with more key players on board, and have success drive success.

15 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific The case for keeping the Melbourne Rebels in Super Rugby Pacific
Search