Select Edition

Northern Northern
Southern Southern
Global Global
NZ NZ

Peter Bills: England's Long Injury List Is More Than Just A Case Of Bad Luck

By Peter Bills
Owen Farrell

The rate of attrition among England’s young rugby players is no coincidence, and some serious questions need to be asked, writes Peter Bills.

ADVERTISEMENT

As England prepare for their autumn international programme against the southern hemisphere nations (New Zealand excepted) selection has once again become problematic. So many injuries have overtaken so many England players that whatever the final 15 chosen, it is inevitable that the squad will be seven or eight players short of its best.

In other words, we shall be watching matches devalued before they even begin.

The reason for this is twofold. Professional rugby union has become a massively physical sport. Imposing size is no defence whatsoever against the ravages of injuries. Large forwards and smaller backs alike are carried off to the hospital casualty wards with disturbing frequency.

Some weeks ago when England held what coach Eddie Jones warned would be a very physical training programme over two days, flank forward Sam Jones broke a leg attempting a judo manoeuvre. The Wasps flanker had been pencilled in to start against South Africa at Twickenham on November 12 because three other possibilities for the open-side berth, James Haskell, Jack Clifford and Mike Williams were already injured.

This week’s medical bulletin tells us that England will not only be missing four first choice flankers, but also both Saracens and England locks – George Kruis, who has had an operation on a damaged ankle, and Maro Itoje, who fractured his hand last week representing his club – will now miss the whole autumn programme. Another Saracens and England player Owen Farrell has only just started the season after not playing since June due to a back injury.

Also missing will be back-up hooker Luke Cowan-Dickie who has recently undergone ankle surgery.

Both first choice England wings from the June tour to Australia, Anthony Watson and Jack Nowell, also have serious long-term injuries and will miss all the autumn Tests. Meanwhile, England captain Dylan Hartley has been sidelined for the last six weeks and is battling to be match fit for the Test programme.

ADVERTISEMENT

There are others, but you get the point.

[rugbypass-ad-banner id=”1475535264″]

Is it not possible that the second reason for this calamity is overwork? Players admit it sometimes takes them until Tuesday or Wednesday to get over the previous weekend’s battles. Then they face a physical training session and start the countdown to another excessively physical match.

It is true that medical science and therefore preparation has come on in leaps and bounds in modern times. But there is a major snag. The human body remains what it has always been. No-one has yet reinvented any part of it. Which means that despite players being physically bigger, tougher and supposedly better prepared for an 80 minute pounding of their bodies, they cannot avoid one simple fact.

If you subject the human body to such excessive physical punishment, it will break down. There will be a price to pay.

We are seeing the consequences of this overt physicality at all levels of the game, not just in the professional world. Players at junior club level hurtle into one another with a complete disregard for physical safety that is often alarming. And at that level, there are no medical experts on the touchline waiting to administer to a player with a serious injury. Somehow, he has to get on with it which means hobbling back to the clubhouse, icing and then strapping the injury, seeing his doctor the following week (if he’s lucky) and then waiting weeks to see a specialist. By which stage, a lot of damage has been done.

ADVERTISEMENT

Wouldn’t it be nice if the cash-rich Rugby Football Union (RFU) set up a medical programme by which players at ANY level could be fast-tracked towards proper, professional medical attention within a few days of being injured? The current set-up in amateur rugby is a joke when Twickenham, which purports to represent the whole game in England, announces profits running into tens of millions of pounds.

Of course, none of this will injure the sacred cow, ticket sales, ahead of the autumn internationals. Someone will wear the jersey and all the seats will be sold, as usual.

But aren’t we selling two sets of people short here, the players and spectators? The first group had better have wonderful medical insurance for later life. Would you want to have their bodies when they’re 50 or 60 with their wrecked hips, knee joints and arthritis? Then there is the frightening element of concussion with its long term effects.

As for the spectators, we routinely watch inferior teams because of all the injuries. But does anyone care about any of this in the dash for cash?

ADVERTISEMENT

Join free

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | Episode 6

Sam Warburton | The Big Jim Show | Full Episode

Japan Rugby League One | Sungoliath v Eagles | Full Match Replay

Japan Rugby League One | Spears v Wild Knights | Full Match Replay

Boks Office | Episode 10 | Six Nations Final Round Review

Aotearoa Rugby Podcast | How can New Zealand rugby beat this Ireland team

Beyond 80 | Episode 5

Rugby Europe Men's Championship Final | Georgia v Portugal | Full Match Replay

Trending on RugbyPass

Comments

Join free and tell us what you really think!

Sign up for free
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest Features

Comments on RugbyPass

T
Trevor 2 hours ago
Will forgotten Wallabies fit the Joe Schmidt model?

Thanks Brett.. At last a positive article on the potential of Wallaby candidates, great to read. Schmidt’s record as an international rugby coach speaks for itself, I’m somewhat confident he will turn the Wallaby’s fortunes around …. on the field. It will be up to others to steady the ship off the paddock. But is there a flaw in my optimism? We have known all along that Australia has the players to be very competitive with their international rivals. We know that because everyone keeps telling us. So why the poor results? A question that requires a definitive answer before the turn around can occur. Joe Schmidt signed on for 2 years, time to encompass the Lions tour of 2025. By all accounts he puts family first and that’s fair enough, but I would wager that his 2 year contract will be extended if the next 18 months or so shows the statement “Australia has the players” proves to be correct. The new coach does not have a lot of time to meld together an outfit that will be competitive in the Rugby Championship - it will be interesting to see what happens. It will be interesting to see what happens with Giteau law, the new Wallaby coach has already verbalised that he would to prefer to select from those who play their rugby in Australia. His first test in charge is in July just over 3 months away .. not a long time. I for one wish him well .. heaven knows Australia needs some positive vibes.

21 Go to comments
B
Bull Shark 6 hours ago
Jake White: Are modern rugby players actually better?

Of the rugby I’ve born witness to in my lifetime - 1990 to date - I recognize great players throughout those years. But I have no doubt the game and the players are on average better today. So I doubt going back further is going to prove me wrong. The technical components of the game, set pieces, scrums, kicks, kicks at goal. And in general tactics employed are far more efficient, accurate and polished. Professional athletes that have invested countless hours on being accurate. There is one nation though that may be fairly competitive in any era - and that for me is the all blacks. And New Zealand players in general. NZ produces startling athletes who have fantastic ball skills. And then the odd phenomenon like Brooke. Lomu. Mcaw. Carter. Better than comparing players and teams across eras - I’ve often had this thought - that it would be very interesting to have a version of the game that is closer to its original form. What would the game look like today if the rules were rolled back. Not rules that promote safety obviously - but rules like: - a try being worth 1 point and conversion 2 points. Hence the term “try”. Earning a try at goals. Would we see more attacking play? - no lifting in the lineouts. - rucks and break down laws in general. They looked like wrestling matches in bygone eras. I wonder what a game applying 1995 rules would look like with modern players. It may be a daft exercise, but it would make for an interesting spectacle celebrating “purer” forms of the game that roll back the rules dramatically by a few versions. Would we come to learn that some of the rules/combinations of the rules we see today have actually made the game less attractive? I’d love to see an exhibition match like that.

29 Go to comments
FEATURE
FEATURE Why the All Blacks are serious about giving Sam Whitelock one last hurrah Why the All Blacks are serious about giving Sam Whitelock one last hurrah
Search